Massive amounts of mountains of angst making my list. I'm currently hacking my way out of the glass cage of emotion I was trapped in yesterday. Posting impressions on ~half of the places I went; wrote them in an attempt at catharsis/self reflection (sorry if I ramble...) in order to help me rank. Going to try to get the rest done at some point.
Used the following format:
workload:
education:
research:
attendings:
residents:
facilities/technology:
overall:
About me: clinical>basic science=physics, east coast=midwest>west coast, city>not city, pirates>>>ninjas.
In no particular order...
Program:WashU
Workload: I want to start by saying that this was the best run interview day on the trail. It was grueling, with 11 (11!) interviews, but very impressive. There were formal presentation by the chair, PD, physics AND radbio. In addition we were given a nice handout about the residency program and a hard copy of the slideshow. This can be considered a shout out to the coordinator as well as Dr. Hallahan or Dr. Zoberi. IMHO, this kind of stuff DOES matter - Im deciding where to go for the next 5 years of my life and going on as many as 5 interviews a week. Its tough to remember everything and I appreciated the literature from the programs that provided it. (hint to Northwestern, MCW)
Back on track... schedule is an 8-5 or 5:30, less frequent call due to larger program size. This place has huge volume (way higher than I thought...) treating 3k patients/year. Residents only rotate at 2 sites, with the majority of time spent at BJH (the main hospital campus). Peds and gyne volume are stellar.
Education: Solid. 1 hour of formal attending didactic every week and one resident-lead case conference. Hallahan has shaken things up a bit to make things run in a Chicago-style fashion. The residents seemed to feel there were both pluses and minuses to these changes. The residents said the hands-on, practical education was great on an individual level. The physics faculty is superb and extremely committed to resident teaching. I think programs that have a physics residency are typically on the ball, and WashU was no exception. The residents say that the radiobio course was strong as well.
Research: IMHO, some of the best opportunities out there. Full year, with option to break it up into blocks if that suits the project. The entire WashU campus is your oyster. Basic science is incredible, and Dr. Hallahan is a force of nature, Im not Holman bound, but those of you who are may be impressed by the fact that there are FIVE residents currently in the pathway. What Dr. Hallahan isnt, however, is an mdphd-only machine, the way prior reviews on this site suggested. He made it very clear that he was looking for both lab-scientists AND clinicians (with a masters in clinical investigation encouraged for the latter group). With clinical/physics/imaging research opportunities just as strong, if not stronger, than the corresponding basic science. They threw up a fairly mind-boggling slide (~Mayo) of resident publications, and pointed out that the a clinical resident was just as prolific as a lab rat. They have a database structure that is exceeded only by MSK (of the places I went to) and absolutely vast resources.
Perhaps most important it seemed like attendings are incredibly excited about getting residents involved in research; people were practically offering me projects on the interviews. Dr. Hallahan (unlike a certain other famous basic-science chair) was very approachable. He made a point of reassuring me about the relative paucity of lab work in my resume, because after all there arent exactly a sea of physician-scientist positions out there, and somebodys got to run the clinic...
Attendings: Great group, and a great mix of experience and new blood. Ive already spoken a bit about Dr. Hallahan, who I thought was extremely nice. The PD was super sweet and the residents said hes a great teacher. The three youngest attendings I spoke to (Jaboin, Robinson, Schwarz) were all rockstars and people Id really like to work with. Michalski was another example of a super-famous attending who is nonetheless super-nice and super easy to talk to.
Residents: They were a nice, but a serious group with the exception of one of the PGY-2s, who was hilarious. Perhaps a little too serious for me, or it might be more fair to say that I might be a little too goofy for them. That said, dinner was a good time and I think they would be wonderful to work with.
Facilities/Technology: Im to the pressive. The department was extremely nice, and the technology arsenal was very impressive. 8 linacs with all the toys, gamma knife, MR sim, calypso and the Still River which was extremely cool, and enthusiastically presented/explained by Dr. Klien. If I dont end up training at WashU or anywhere with protons, its definitely where I would choose to do a proton month.
Location: I got a handful of interviews there, but Im not sure how I really feel about the midwest. I was dead-set against St. Louis going in, but I was pleasantly surprised by forest park and the area surrounding the medical center, which was gorgeous with a logic-defying low cost of living. If I could take the ten most important people in my life and bring them with me, Id probably rank this place 1st.
Overall: Vies with Uchicago for best in the midwest...incredible technology and informatics. Great balance of opportunities and workload. Hallahan is the coolest.
Program: Stanford
Workload: They residents called it a 7-6 or 7, and said they did end up in the department on the weekends fairly regularly. The majority of them made it to the dinner and the interview day, which I always take as a good sign.
Education: Solid, attending driven. Regular lectures, residents give talks rarely. Neat visiting professor seminars with bigwigs from other places.
Research: They get a full year, and seem to do a wide range of different stuff, from epidemiology to basic science, etc. Allegedly theres a review process that each residents goes through to get his/her project approved. At least one resident was doing a mish-mash of clinical stuff instead of one grand venture, and seemed almost disappointed in himself (fought urge to pat him on back and tell him thats what most people end up doing at most places) I got the sense that you had to be more of a self-starter to get research done at this place. Thats not a bad thing, but it was a sharp contrast to MSK/Uchicago/Washu/Hopkins where attendings throw projects in residents laps.
Attendings: The search for a new chair is underway, and it could get interesting. Donaldson is as feisty and awesome and fun as everyone says. The program director - if nothing else - created common ground for applicants to bond over her ridiculous question (pretend you are ten years in the future and describe yourself in past tense - kill me now) Seriousness actually seemed to be the theme of the day. With a few exceptions, I found this group less approachable than most.
Residents: The PD mustve said 19.6 times that the residents are close. (and another 17.4 that they are talented) They were nice and friendly, sure, but I honestly got more of a sense of closeness at other places (Utah, Cleveland Clinic, Chicago, Hopkins). Maybe just a serious group, or I totally missed something.
Facilities/Technology: We didnt go to the main hospital, but the department is really nice. 8 linacs, 2 cyberknifes. Not necessarily the best place to train if youve caught the brachy bug, though.
Location: Beautiful, yes. Palm trees, check. But the residents copped to horrendous cost of living (a few seemed really stressed about it) and I dont see the draw of living in a gorgeous suburb. Married with kids? Have fun living in a shoebox. Single? Nowhere to go out. The least this (extremely wealthy) department could do is subsidize housing the way the New York programs do. Apparently attendings get low interest loans, but residents are left out in the cold (ok its not cold, but Id argue that camping is not a desirable housing option). I almost wonder if everyone if this is why everyone is so outdoorsy....
OVERALL: Great technology (esp for cyberknife fans) and research opportunities. Heavy on buzzwords on the interview day.
Program: Case Western
Workload: Case is very busy, and the attendings seem swamped (leaving interviews to run to clinic but most are capable of functioning independently without resident assistance. The residents seem to decide their own schedule, and told us it was an 8-5. Only one resident said he studied on the weekends.
Education: It was impossible to get a sense of what the didactics are like at this place because both the residents and the PD were vague about the schedule. For instance I asked, how often do residents give talks? and was told, alternatively, every once in awhile, oh, every other week or so, and It really depends... One resident did give a talk at a morning conference when we were there, which was attended by one attending (the PD) with two others showing up late. It featured a bizarre amount of cartoons. We all laughed awkwardly. Fun times.
Research: Opportunities abound, though it doesnt seem as though the residents necessarily take advantage. Case has incredible basic sciences with a few faculty within the department (Welford is a new addition who seems to be doing some exciting work) and there are retrospective databases waiting to be built by an ambitious resident.
Attendings: Machtay (new Chair, big at RTOG) seems like a nice person with very solid vision. He also seemed pretty busy with the high volume, and perhaps a little removed from the residency program. Lyons (PD) seemed nice, but was hard to get a read on. She slipped into the conference without introducing herself or being introduced by the residents, and never gave any formal sort of talk about the program. Ellis (prostate) was impressive and seemed like he would be a good teacher. Almost everyone I interviewed with referred to, the way things used to be, in a negative way, and two attendings directly insulted the former chair. That was a little weird.
Residents: Seemed fairly indifferent towards the program. Examples: Yea, you can do research. I did this abstract for ASTRO. Its kind of bull****. Yea, lots of advanced head and neck cases from hillbilly territory if you like that kind of stuff, the new cancer center looks cool. We havent gone over there yet, but apparently you can take tours or something.
Facilities/Technology: All the toys (gammaknife, cyberknife, tomo) and the new cancer center did look cool (at least from the outside). This place has money pouring out of its butt. Huge plus.
Location: Cleveland was better than I thought, which doesnt say much. The suburbs behind case seem like theyd be a nice place for families, and the cost of living is good. For unmarried me...not so much.
Overall:Someone with the fortitude to deal with both the city (IE someone with kids and a spouse) and a program that seems like its in a state of mild disarray could probably do big things.
Program: Mayo-Rochester
Workload: Completely reasonable. 7:30 or8-5:30 tops. Weekends are rare. (per residents)
Education:Absolutely outstanding. Comparable to UChicago with regimented case conferences, but residents actually pimp each other (the presenters pimp audience members) and attendings jump in. This sounds like it has the potential to turn malignant, but (at least on our interview day) was absolutely both funny and pleasant, with the pimper hilariously lauding the pimpee on his correct answers and a few attendings contributing excellent teaching points. Residents give grand rounds style talks yearly. They also attend formal lectures with the medical oncology fellows which they say are good.
Research: Unbelievable, probably unparalelled with WashU as the only place I visited that comes close. Residents churn out at least 5-6 first authors, get their names on 20+ papers by graduation! They couldnt fit resident publications on a single slide. Amazing attending support for resident research, including emphasis on resident protocol authorship with execution in the Mayo network. Reasonable database structure (not on the level of memorial, but better than most places).
Attendings: IMHO Laack is the best PD on the trail. She was nice, obviously cared about her residents, clearly a great teacher (throwing out great teaching points during conference). Every attending I met seemed pretty cool.
Residents: Were hilarious. Shout out to Jason who gave the tour and Brad who came along to provide additional comic relief. Really great people. But...9/10 married, which seems to be almost necessary in Rochester due to the a. cold and b. small population.
Facilities/Technology: Its the Mayo Clinic. Gigantic nice hospital, gigantic department. Heaven for fans of tunnels. Gamma Knife. High Brachy volume. New proton facility (built on a non-prostate model
) on the way... ?2014. Its Mayo, so this seems like it will actually happen.
Location: And herein lies the rub. Supposedly Rochester is beautiful in the summer, but Id be a human icicle by then. Perhaps if I had a spouse to keep me warm at night, and entertained during the day, Id find it more tolerable. Perhaps.
OVERALL: If I had a family, Id rank this at the top or close. Great education, great volume, best PD out there, awesome clinical opportunities, great co-residents. Amazing focus on patient care. But unfortunately, Im at least 2.4 billion years away from having a family and kids. Unless of course I match at Mayo (which I do fully intend to rank). If that happens Ill be on a mail-order-husband website, stat. Ill start with Russia, so I can find someone who tolerates the cold.
Program: Memorial Sloan Kettering
Workload: By Rad Onc standards, rough, but its a small price to pay for training at THE MSKCC. Residents are in house about 8-8, and often on a Saturday, but it varies by service and some arent that bad.
Education: Aside from the inherent advantage that comes from high volume and crazy cases, education is a little sparse where the basics are concerned. Didactics seem less formal than at other places, presumably because there just isnt time. Each month focuses on a given malignancy. There are regular biweeklyish lectures, often provided by medical oncologists, urologists, providing their perspective. Amazing lectures (everyone who talks is a demigod in the field), but perhaps less practical for the PGY-2. Of course when the Rad Onc attendings do speak, its absolutely unparalelled (a contouring workshop from Michael Zelefsky, peds from Wolden, lyphoma from Yahalom, etc.) Residents give few formal talks themselves.
Radiobio is at Sinai with all the other New York programs. Physics is solid.
Research: Thanks to Powell, now a full year. Amazing clinical research opportunities if you can find the time to pursue them (big if). Also MSKCC has an absolutely incredible database structure that makes retrospective research as easy as snapping your fingers at the nearest RSA. New emphasis on basic science, and I found this out the hard way when Powell skewered me squirming into my seat, impaled on my own inexperience in the lab. It seems as though the first two classes of residents are split 50-50 between lab and clinical research, probably to his chargrin.
Attendings: Scions of the field. Too many who are too famous to list, but not an ego among them. Some of the biggest names were some of the nicest and most approachable physicians I have met, and find time to teach enthusiastically despite the insane volume.
Residents: Overall, a very nice group of people; geographically and personally diverse. Id say they are a little less tight-knit then at some places, but thats an understandable product of having 20 residents.
Facilities/Technology: Its MSKCC
12 machines, a VIP floor in the hospital, everything is above ground, Calypso, unbelievable support staff. And if you like brachy, its the place to be. Unbelievable tumor boards because medical and surgical oncology are insanely awesome as well.
Location: Its the upper east side. You either hate it or you love it. Most people love it, and they are correct. The people who hate it are uncultured and hermetic gnomes. Residents get subsidized housing, and (thanks again!) one of the residents was nice enough to invite us in. Its actually extremely nice, and the cost comes out pre-tax.
Overall: Its MSKCC. Quoting Wolden, we give our residents everything but rest. Believe it.
Program: The University of Chicago
Workload: clinical volume is actually completely reasonable; but seemes like studying can end up filling in a great deal of time. Most residents called it a 7-5. Seems like you will definitely be there once over the weekend studying as a PGY-2. Only one double service. Residents spend ⅓ of time at another (smaller) site.
Education: Absolutely amazing, likely unparalleled through sheer brute force. Formal lectures on every main region + peds by the attendings for the PGY2s in the summer, presentations by the residents on the same every Tuesday. Also, formal case-based presentations by the residents every Monday. Radiobio and Physics daily during the summer, teaching is good. Formal stats class as well. Yes, the rumors are true, it is a pimp session run by the formidable tag team of Weichsclebaum/Hellman (we witnessed on the interview day). But the pimpees (two of the 4th years) were frickin awesomely on their ****, so apparently 3 years of hard core pimpage pays dividends. Also, I would definitely never call the place malignant. Hardcore, yes. The tone was stern but definitely not nasty, and the residents were quick to help each other out.
No formal dosimetry, which I think is a big minus. The residents say you just have to figure out that stuff yourself, almost implying that offering a formal dosimetry rotation is coddling residents.
Icing on the cake? Residents get three months of away electives (yes, on top of the year of research!) and they can go anywhere, funded. Per the PD Australia is popular because they have skin and sun, so its a pretty valuable addition to their education I guess...
Research: A full year of research, very strong. Used to be only basic science (often in the chairs lab), but now is more flexible, apparently. They just added a new physician scientist on faculty, so more basic science opportunities are opening up as well. Resident research is a priority, and they regularly churn out papers. Only minus is informatics (which I expected to be good) is not nearly on the level of WashU/MSK/Mayo. Individual attendings have databases, but that seems to be about it.
Attendings: Range from solid-incredible. The residents were effusive about Liauws teaching, and he has one helluva CV on the website. They just got a few new ones, and its a very young group overall. New MD/PHD from Stanford is starting a lab. The chair is a formidable research machine. The PD seems very approachable and smart. He gave a very good overview of the program.
Residents: Extremely well versed in the literature. The didactics pay off. They were also very, very nice and honestly seemed pretty laid back. I was interviewed by two (a product of an overbooked interview day? By FAR the biggest one of the season, maybe 20 people!) a 4th year and a 5th year, the 5th year was extremely nice. The PGY-2 we met (only one was there, others at a second site?) seemed very stressed but previous posts on SDN indicate that this was true last year...and the 3s seem ok. So maybe a super steep learning curve?
Facilities/Technology: New hospital building being built (allegedly done 2013, and is mostly constructed and looking amazing) but the hospital is nothing special right now. Department is nice. 4 linacs, 2 at other site. Planning on some exciting stuff in the new hospital. Strong tumor boards. Bonus that IM program is awesome and hospital has a good reputation overall.
Location: Its a small distance from the main downtown, but the areas seems nice and most of the residents live downtown. Its also still Chicago, which beats the hell out of most places. The commute from downtown is only 15 minutes and its along the lake.
Overall: Academic pressure, but it pays serious dividends. Probably best Rad Onc didactic education in the country. Residents are studs. Australia? really? Awesome.