Is this true about the duration of radiation

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

The8

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
200
Reaction score
109
Hey, can you guys look at the attached images and explain whats up with the logic .... I didn't know this was instantaneous but apparently it is.... the energy should be additive, no?

Members don't see this ad.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-07-19 at 11.32.20 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-07-19 at 11.32.20 PM.png
    37.3 KB · Views: 30
  • Screen Shot 2016-07-19 at 11.32.25 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-07-19 at 11.32.25 PM.png
    30.4 KB · Views: 30
Duration of excitatory radiation doesn't matter because once one quantum of energy is absorbed by the surface, it emits some level of radiation that corresponds to the excitatory radiation literally at the speed of light. Therefore, there's no time for the energy to build up, or become "additive" as you say.
 
Top