When I was a student, no.
Now that I'm more than a decade in practice and deal with the Administrative Investigation Boards for REAL screwups in medicine, hell no.
It's actually not about money for me, although I would argue that unless you went into certain specialties, pharmacy in my timeframe (2004 grad) was clearly the right place and the right time and the standard physician (I'm going to use an IM physician who works 50 hours at $220k as the standard) won't anywhere near catch up to me financially now or ever unless they make more than 15% annually . The lead is just too high nowadays and considering that physician pay is flattening across many categories (and the impending CMS changes), I can't see a situation where the standard physician is going to be outearn me in a career.
Intellectually, lab medicine/pathology in blood banking or nuclear medicine interested me and it pays well, but I am not willing to make the emotional investment (the schooling isn't a problem, but dedication to the day in and day out task would be). The difference in emotional investment for a successful physician is higher than a corresponding successful pharmacist. The analogy I give is that the best answers from the least psychologically problematic veterans that I treated went into the military for the following reasons:
1. "I wanted to drive a tank,...fly a plane,...be a fighter...sail everywhere" - Activities that are inherently military in nature. ("Kill people" is a specific variant that I only hear from certain rare Marines and oddly not from Army)
2. "I didn't mind the price I paid to drive a tank..." - Less concerned about the personal sacrifice if it meant doing those activities
3. "I made enough to afford quality booze every night, and that's all I needed." The money is good enough such that the activity is its own reward. It's not the activity alone, and it's not the renumeration alone, it's both. You need to earn enough that you can think about other things.
The most intellectually healthy physicians (which doesn't become apparent until about 15 years into their career and I think this is 10 years into ours) are adjusted to 1-3. Money still is a driver, but just the act of practicing medicine is still a worthwhile matter for them. What I see though are a lot of physicians trying to enter "research" or go into the administration suite for burnout reasons. There are very few physicians at either university that I am affiliated with who are truly research as a primary occupation. Most are delegated to research as it's an escape from yet another day of the visit grindstone.
It was (and still is) about the activity for me. Yeah, I like teaching. Yeah, I like research. I can do administration. And I'm a fair bureaucrat. But, if I were doing what I was trained to do (nuclear), I can be a cantankerous, anti-social night owl with just a simple compounding job ahead of him. I wanted something to do where it was technically complicated enough that you had to do it right, to do in an environment where people respect your need for concentration (probably the factor that pisses off retail outpatient the most), and did not necessarily need 'personal' relations (in fact, my official federal Position Description contains NO performance element, required or optional for customer service or humane relations which was the norm for pharmacy for years, and damn those clinical pharmacy specialists for introducing that to the 0660 PD!).
Oh wait, I'm there right now and in two hours the mixing begins...I had my administrative assistant rewrite my schedule this week since we've finished the AIB's from the July new resident screwups. Then after this week, four weeks in the Hubert Humphrey building in DC reading/writing policy reports related to infection control. The most interactive I'll get is to go meet people who are medically ordered to be antisocial (the decommissioned PHS Carville, LA hospital for lepers) to talk to the few surviving ones for a report on the effects of forced quarantine (it's as tragic as it gets considering how inhumane we used to be about quarantine, people forget that there's a reason the PHS CC has a uniform). I've made it perfectly clear to everyone that I don't want to talk to any trainee or preceptor or deal with any bureaucratic crisis from anyone else until after Labor Day.
What I think pharmacy does a piss poor job doing is something called occupational enrichment. It's nice at times to rotate out of your 'normal' job into doing something else for a little while. That's what keeps me from being bored out of my skull with nuclear or retail outpatient, my other favorite practice area nonsarcastically. If you can vary the work you do, and even better if you can control when you vary that work, it's hard to burnout. I do think that everyone has an occupational lifespan in certain areas. From work we've done in the feds (and corresponding work at UChicago and UW on physicians), it's roughly somewhere between 30,000 and 48,000 (given the standard 2040 hour year and adjusting 1.5 to 2 hours for every OT hour) for most pharmacists who make it past their initial 10,000 mentally intact where you start to see the major signs of burnout.
What changed the answer to "hell no" for me (and this even affects my relationship with pharmacy) is the amount of bureaucratic BS that I have to put up with nowadays in the healthcare profession. Who the hell designed the reimbursement system to slave drive primary care physicians into the shortest visits that they can ethically squeeze? Why must pharmacy play these games on AWP, AAC, WAC, and pharmacist personnel between PBMs, the chains, and your job. What happened to where the new graduates aren't work capable coming from pharmacy school? Where pharmacists have some expectations of working in the medical bureaucracy, not many nurses or physicians really get the extent of their participation in it, and things like CPOE and CPT billable Irate pressure have ramped up the stress on the rank and file. I usually agree with BMBiology on his complaints, although I have a different sort of headache as I know I'm the one giving his kind the headaches as well as having some of my own.
If I could do it all over again, I would choose pharmacy with the condition that I could have entered at the time I did (school and internship were sufficient to train you for your job, no residency required, many jobs for few grads, weird jobs to those who bothered to look). I just would have probably taken more classes in theatrical acting (how to fool people in presentations comes in real handy in the corporate world), creative writing (like acting, but writing a coherent narrative is a prized skill in the bureaucracy), and known sooner that I wouldn't be able to finish my career as a pure dispensing role and that no job is ultimately safe that you don't work at. I am not sure how much of my antipathy in the healthcare field is related to the bureaucracy or the human relations of people being horrible to each other than from the operational issues (making certain sorts of mistakes or negligence that is unique to the pharmacy profession). Knowing what I know now though, I would tell myself that the idea of how medicine practiced in 2000-2004 is nowhere as fun to practice in 2016 (and I thought even then that primary care was a big chore).
If I had to enter now (2016), I'm not sure. If I were not intelligent, I would have probably kept at being a licensed electrician in a lineman position. Not exactly a glamorous job, but it fairly pays the bills, unemployment is not a problem, and it doesn't have a strong customer service component. If I were me as I were those years ago, I would have probably done mathematical statistics for actuary work as an undergraduate and probably taken a PhD in applied math or computational statistics to work for no such agency on some arcane transmission methods or Bureau of the Census/NCHS on demographic methods. IT is a means to an end for me, it's more interesting to find general algorithms than program for a specific function.
To the OP, how much is it the profession, how much is it the environment, and how much of it is you? Can't easily change the profession (and I think changing yourself is the hardest thing), but you could possibly exchange the work environment for something different perhaps?