- Joined
- Feb 1, 2012
- Messages
- 8,219
- Reaction score
- 97
yes he can..... People often correlate things inappropriately and draw conclusions therein. This is why an alternative explanation for findings stands as an appropriate counter-argument. think "null hypothesis". In testing it is not sufficient only to support your hypothesis. You must also be able to reject your null hypothesis. The existence of an artificial influence like an outwardly controlled number of residency seats to match demand would not support the claim that low unemployment means shortage.
It is like saying a college town doesnt have enough bars because they are at a 1-in 1-out policy at the door. This is controlled by a separate set of criteria (fire code) so it is inappropriate to draw this conclusion.
It is like saying a college town doesnt have enough bars because they are at a 1-in 1-out policy at the door. This is controlled by a separate set of criteria (fire code) so it is inappropriate to draw this conclusion.