http://www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/compensation/2012/ophthalmology
Does this seem accurate to you guys/ gals?
On slide 2, it said mean income is $270k for 2011. It said 11% made more than $500k, but on the chart, it only shows 4%. So which is correct?
It also shows that 46% make less than $200k, and about 21% make $100k or less. 21% less than $100k? I find that hard to believe. What do you all think?
How do you think theses numbers compare with MGMA 2011 report data? The MGMA does break it down to cornea, retina, etc. Which one do you think is more accurate? All I can say is that the MGMA data looks more appealing, but whether it is more accurate, I have no idea.
Bottom line is that it doesn't really matter what these surveys show, especially if they are inaccurate, but it doesn't hurt to discuss some of these so called taboo issues.
Does this seem accurate to you guys/ gals?
On slide 2, it said mean income is $270k for 2011. It said 11% made more than $500k, but on the chart, it only shows 4%. So which is correct?
It also shows that 46% make less than $200k, and about 21% make $100k or less. 21% less than $100k? I find that hard to believe. What do you all think?
How do you think theses numbers compare with MGMA 2011 report data? The MGMA does break it down to cornea, retina, etc. Which one do you think is more accurate? All I can say is that the MGMA data looks more appealing, but whether it is more accurate, I have no idea.
Bottom line is that it doesn't really matter what these surveys show, especially if they are inaccurate, but it doesn't hurt to discuss some of these so called taboo issues.