Do you MRI for sensory asymmetry in the legs? Just for motor changes?
We all tend to MRI for cauda equina signs - bowel/bladder dysfunction, weakness, perineal anesthesia, progressive worsening, etc.
But how do you approach patients with sciatica-type picture with asymmetric sensation in the legs?
I had a patient yesterday that I didn't MRI. I've gone in both directions in the past. Just wanted to hear other people's thoughts...
Rarely will an ED MRI change anything.
Cauda equina, acute cord signs (neuro signs not localized to one dermatome.) Sensory changes not a big deal if chronic or just a single dermatome. Fever and back pain? rule out abscess (if not renal) get MRI. Recent intervention (epidural) and neuro symptoms (injection, surgery) get MRI. Cancer or risk factors and sign of myelopathy/cord compression > acute MRI.
ED MRI for just acute uncomplicated sciatica? I can't think of a greater waste of MRI time, and I'm a tester. These walk into PCP, ortho, neuro, chiro offices all day long and don't get emergent MRI's. An ED MRI for acute sciatic accomplishes nothing.
"Okay sir. I thought you have sciatica. Guess what? You have sciatic. Here's this shiny CD that proves it. So there."
Think, cord, cord, cord, cord, cord, is this cord (or cauda equina just because messing with a big central disc and multiple roots to the bowel and bladder is badness and conus medullaris mimics this but is technically cord)?
But simple "My back hurts and it shoots down to my big toe and tingles doc."
Doesn't need an emergent MRI. Outpatient work up. In fact, an MRI for acute sciatica often will get denied even outpatient until it's been going on > 6 weeks and until it's failed conservative treatment.