- Joined
- Jun 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,881
- Reaction score
- 1,849
Some of my friends from high school are teachers in east Texas and they both work for the same high school. One graduated from the University of North Texas and owes around $35k in student loans and the other graduated from Baylor with $190k in student loans. They were arguing on Facebook about how their student loans are going to take forever to pay off and UNT friend said "I'll get them done faster than you" jokingly. But why?
That's when I came up with this idea: student loan prior authoriziations. If the taxpayer is going to foot the bill for a student to go to a university then shouldn't they do it appropriately? I say set up a system where it's like this: want to major in math so you can be a high school teacher? We'll give you loans to attend UNT, UT-Dallas, UT-Austin, etc. Go to Baylor and you will not qualify for student loans. Go to Rice and you will not qualify for student loans. Want to go to law school? We'll give you loans to attend Harvard, Yale, Stanford, etc. Go to Harding University and you will not qualify for loans. Here's how I would respond to naysayers, specifically my Baylor friend...
Baylor is a better school than UNT and is ranked higher in US News and World Report.
If that is true then why are you at the same place of employment as someone who went to UNT? Shouldn't you have a better job if Baylor is a better school? If you're going to work where UNT grads work then go to UNT. We're not going to give you $150k more for the same outcome.
This crazy idea of mine would force these private schools to lower their tuition. How else are they going to react when the federal government says they won't issue loans to attend your school? Right now a student can get a loan for whatever school they select so universities have absolutely no incentive to keep tuition rates down when they have guaranteed money coming their way.
Alright. Eat me alive.
That's when I came up with this idea: student loan prior authoriziations. If the taxpayer is going to foot the bill for a student to go to a university then shouldn't they do it appropriately? I say set up a system where it's like this: want to major in math so you can be a high school teacher? We'll give you loans to attend UNT, UT-Dallas, UT-Austin, etc. Go to Baylor and you will not qualify for student loans. Go to Rice and you will not qualify for student loans. Want to go to law school? We'll give you loans to attend Harvard, Yale, Stanford, etc. Go to Harding University and you will not qualify for loans. Here's how I would respond to naysayers, specifically my Baylor friend...
Baylor is a better school than UNT and is ranked higher in US News and World Report.
If that is true then why are you at the same place of employment as someone who went to UNT? Shouldn't you have a better job if Baylor is a better school? If you're going to work where UNT grads work then go to UNT. We're not going to give you $150k more for the same outcome.
This crazy idea of mine would force these private schools to lower their tuition. How else are they going to react when the federal government says they won't issue loans to attend your school? Right now a student can get a loan for whatever school they select so universities have absolutely no incentive to keep tuition rates down when they have guaranteed money coming their way.
Alright. Eat me alive.