Interesting data. The sharp drop-off in the # of anesthesiology graduates in the 1990s is clearly evident here, and it seems like we may be headed for another one of those in the future, unless IMGs/FMGs pick up the slack.
Also interesting is that the # of AAs has barely made a dent, while the # of CRNAs has seen a huge increase in the last decade or two.
Since 2010 several AA programs have started so that number is on the rise. It's still nowhere near the number of CRNA grads, but I'd guess around 400 a year?
Interesting data. The sharp drop-off in the # of anesthesiology graduates in the 1990s is clearly evident here, and it seems like we may be headed for another one of those in the future, unless IMGs/FMGs pick up the slack.
Also interesting is that the # of AAs has barely made a dent, while the # of CRNAs has seen a huge increase in the last decade or two.
Interesting data. The sharp drop-off in the # of anesthesiology graduates in the 1990s is clearly evident here, and it seems like we may be headed for another one of those in the future, unless IMGs/FMGs pick up the slack.
Also interesting is that the # of AAs has barely made a dent, while the # of CRNAs has seen a huge increase in the last decade or two.
The data is so dated. Also remember counting both pgy 1 and pgy2 categories with anesthesia. (1100 plus 500) it's really close to 1600 finishing these days.
Interesting data. The sharp drop-off in the # of anesthesiology graduates in the 1990s is clearly evident here, and it seems like we may be headed for another one of those in the future, unless IMGs/FMGs pick up the slack.
Also interesting is that the # of AAs has barely made a dent, while the # of CRNAs has seen a huge increase in the last decade or two.
In the US, 150K is not the lowest salary. Even with full benefits, etc., there are numbers lower than 150K.
Blade depends on if Crna does own billing. I have said before in Alabama Crna only group each makes over 400k with 10 weeks off. They do work hard 60 hours a week. In North Carolina Crna only rural its around 300k easy job 35 hours a week with maybe 40-50 TOTAL OR cases each week FOR ENTIRE hospital (excludes GI coverage). Key word being doing own billing or having no one shave money off the top.
And this points out the BS with the graphics you post. This only for fields where women are at least 40% of the workforce (small print). I know for a fact that there are many fields where women make serious bank, just by nature of being in those fields. Quick example, the multitude of engineering fields and related jobs.
It's equivalent to a click-bait article. Those listed are not the "best paying" jobs for women.
Please cite your source.
You're right, it does say it all. It says I'm able to read at more than a 5th grade comprehension level, can critically think, and can actually communicate information in an articulate manner without resorting to copy paste of random pictures or abstracts.
What does a commentary on gender pay gap have to do with the falsity of the graphic I keep calling out? Try and switch the narrative, but that doesn't change the discussion about that misleading graphic.
I don't think he's changing the subject. I think he's responding directly to your request of a source for women working less hours and seeking better work/life balance.
No, he added qualifiers that were in no way included in the graphic. Such as number of hours worked for given pay. It is for this reason I included a link to the most recent BLS data which demonstrates that there are other occupations with "better pay".
Seeing as you have no idea what a CRNA does or an anesthesiologist the thing to be done is take the opportunity to be quiet.
Seeing as I can read what's been posted on this thread and can formulate an opinion for myself, I think you should take this opportunity to take a phallic object and go to town with it.
Nope, just tired of Blade's BS posts.
I never voiced an opinion either way about the concept of income inequality. So ok, cool for you.
