- Joined
- Jul 28, 2014
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
anyone heard from cleveland, john hopkins...??
Both are huge with wanting their fellows to go into academics following training. The program director from UW came from UCSF, so he tries to model the UW program after UCSF. If you interview, you must give every impression that you will be research heavy and want academics. Merely giving them the impression that you may want to do community private practice is a big red flag for either of those two. Between picking the two, choose which city you like better and who you thought was nice on interview day......other than that.....both huge on academic careers possibly more than anywhere else except for the Harvard program. They both have their share of snotty academic types, but that may be your thing. In addition both programs have academic research heavy tracks or a physician educator track, which is also academic in nature.
Good chances . Make sure you interview well at top 5 places of your choiceI applied early this week ( late )?. Img community hospital. h1b visa. Ok to change to j1.
Usmle triple 99. 245-258-240. 2 poster presentation. Resident and teacher of year twice. 4 strong lor's. Strong mspe from the dean .
I don't know what is my chance. Any answer.
With the applicant numbers decreasing below the number of positions in recent years, are more Nephrology programs offering pre-match positions these days? Anyone hear of this type of thing going on?
I understand the NRMP changed their rules to require residencies to be all-in, but as I understood it, fellowships are not bound by the all-in rule.
Hi all. Was wondering if I could get some input regarding your opinions on the Nephrology programs at University of Washington (Seattle) and UCSF. What are their strenghts and weaknesses? If you could have your pick, which would you choose?
Same here..IV from UC davis
Hi all. Was wondering if I could get some input regarding your opinions on the Nephrology programs at University of Washington (Seattle) and UCSF. What are their strenghts and weaknesses? If you could have your pick, which would you choose?
The only reason I joined is because I don't plan on working in USA . I have job lined up in south east Asia where nephrology still pays decent enough to live a good lifeOlden Days
Few nephrology Positions
Growing ESRD population
Physicians owned their own dialysis units(facility charges are far greater than physician visit charges)
they could visit dialysis patients as many times as needed clinically(of course open to abuse)
Hospitalists were rare and Primary care physicians needed help more often + they understood the need to have a nephrology support structure - more referrals
consult codes were different and paid higher
Office made some money on Epo Injections
Transition
Davita/Fresenius bought dialysis units - Old nephrologists made a killing by selling their units
Older guys now stay on as directors/part share in the unit
Current
False projections about increasing ESRD+ Totally false articles about a shortage of nephrologists (ASN has to say so to keep it's source of income)
No growth in ESRD population
Explosion in nephrology fellowship positions - even small community programs have fellowships
You can do no more than 4 visits per month
you only need one director for clinic and one person can be director at 2 places - most of them are occupied by nephrologists who see few patients but own big groups
Takes you ages to become a partner and top guy keeps hiring new slaves to keep the money flowing to him while he does little work.
Non compete clauses enforced by these guys who dont retire
No difference between consult codes and internal med codes - with no procedures or limited procedures to do - hardly any different billing than IM
Hospitalists took over - less likely to refer, as under pressure to get patients out to keep stay minimum+ Hospitalists have a tendency to resent specialists, some of whom can be jerks. With an oversupply of nephrologists now hospitalists have the say who they refer to - smooching matters not your patient skills. Makes one wonder if they refer because they believe that this physician provides good care or because they can go out to a fancy restaurant /have drinks funded by the consultant
Epo is restricted with indications
Primary care docs sold their practices to hospitals and are least bothered by what happens to their patients any more - they dont care where their patients end up.
Please read what I posted carefully - This speciality is on it's rapid course to bottom of the pit - Join at your own peril .
Noone gave me an honest input when i applied - I wish someone did.
I finished my fellowship a year ago. I liked my training , but would not do it now that I know the reality of nephrology in community .
Quit in middle only of u do not intend to apply again
Posting to spread info about the scam being perpetrated by nephrology programs and ASN.
There are no jobs
Even the jobs that are there will involve twice the work and half the pay of Hospitalist.
how many total number of interviews for everyone this season, so far ?!
Medscape compensation reflects data from yester years before the obamacare kick in and nephrology program massive expansion leading to oversupply. Every single fellow who joined from my program/all the new fellows in the area that I joined make 130-170 .
Which one would i believe - My paycheck/My freinds paychecks that they share or an old medscape report which is lagging behind reality
" nor as bad as it seems on this forum" - Let people learn the hard way.
There has been no justification to increase number of programs - ESRD growth was a flat line.
Just search number of jobs on NEJM and davita source - u can c the numbers.
Please do not mislead the residents
I am not suggesting that people stop doing nephrology. But do it after knowing the following
1. Nephrology you see in residency and what you practice are very different
2. You will be lucky if you find a job
3. You will put in twice the time and get half-2/3 pay of a Hospitalist
4. You will be panhandling for consults for the rest of your life
5. You will be a social worker for very sick group
6. Programs need bodies so that the attending a don't have to wake up or come in in the middle of the night.
7. Other than dialysis there is no single rx in bread and butter nephrology (GN too infrequent in clinical practice)
8. It does not matter where you train if you do private practice . Universities are worse than private practice for job opportunities or pay
After knowing the above If you still join Nephro - pay the price with your career for your love of nephrology.
Pay may continue to decrease to ?? 100k
Let's is see how far these programs will push nephrology into the ditch by keeping current number of training programs
IMGs stay away from this trap called nephrology- it's not worth the effort you guys put in to make it here.
I am not suggesting that people stop doing nephrology. But do it after knowing the following
1. Nephrology you see in residency and what you practice are very different
2. You will be lucky if you find a job
3. You will put in twice the time and get half-2/3 pay of a Hospitalist
4. You will be panhandling for consults for the rest of your life
5. You will be a social worker for very sick group
6. Programs need bodies so that the attending a don't have to wake up or come in in the middle of the night.
7. Other than dialysis there is no single rx in bread and butter nephrology (GN too infrequent in clinical practice)
8. It does not matter where you train if you do private practice . Universities are worse than private practice for job opportunities or pay
After knowing the above If you still join Nephro - pay the price with your career for your love of nephrology.
Pay may continue to decrease to ?? 100k
Let's is see how far these programs will push nephrology into the ditch by keeping current number of training programs
IMGs stay away from this trap called nephrology- it's not worth the effort you guys put in to make it here.
If you still make it to interviews, atleast ask the program directors what happened to their prev fellows?
Not sure you will be told the truth.
I wish I visited sdn more often and listened to people like nephappl.
Paying the price right now with a career that is going nowhere - thx to my stupidity and irresponsible expansion of nephrology numbers by nephrology programs.
If you still make it to interviews, atleast ask the program directors what happened to their prev fellows?
Not sure you will be told the truth.
Funny people complaining when we have been warning this situation for several years. More frequent visits and in particular listening to what we say here @ SDN would have relieved some pain.
I agree with almost everything said so far.
I am lucky enough to work in a big practice with an established trajectory and reputation and a defined partnership track but jobs like this are very rare nowadays; that being said starting salary is well below hospital medicine or primary care but you see a light at the end of the tunnel. We hired our last MD a couple of years ago and we still do not know if we should have done it. No plans to hire in the medium term despite multiple requests every week.
Our competition hires quite often and is the trend I have seen in several places; he brings a couple of guys , uses them up for two or three years and then they give up as no partnership is seen in the horizon ; when they leave they can not stay in the area as they have non competition clauses so they have to start all over again; he then bring another couple of suckers for the next couple of years and so on. How he can get away with this??? Lots of supply so replacing a doctor is not difficult and you do not have to offer too much for people to take it.
In primary care or hospital medicine is harder to do so ; you have to offer something decent otherwise people will go somewhere else. Nephrology docs do not have that option.
Do not blame practices for hiring PAs or NPs; unfortunately workforce policy is dictated by academics that have no idea how a business is run. For us to survive we have to maximize productivity and use of resources. In academic medicine your main financial worry is to get a paycheck; we have to pay benefits, employees, generate payroll , pay taxes, comply with hundreds and hundreds of regulations with lower reimbursement.
It is funny; my program is a big advocate of the "nephrologist shortage theory" so they needed nephrologists and they replaced them with NPs however they do not take call or work on weekends. Solution? The hospital sponsored 2 more fellowship positions with its own money as fellows are cheaper than NPs or PAs with no limit on how much you can work them up.
Do you have to be crazy going into nephrology these days? Yes you have to but lack of common sense and being prone to make irrational decisions is a very common human behavior. Do whatever you want; at the end is your problem dealing with your own frustrations. Here @ SDN we told you so.
Funny people complaining when we have been warning this situation for several years. More frequent visits and in particular listening to what we say here @ SDN would have relieved some pain.
I agree with almost everything said so far.
I am lucky enough to work in a big practice with an established trajectory and reputation and a defined partnership track but jobs like this are very rare nowadays; that being said starting salary is well below hospital medicine or primary care but you see a light at the end of the tunnel. We hired our last MD a couple of years ago and we still do not know if we should have done it. No plans to hire in the medium term despite multiple requests every week.
Our competition hires quite often and is the trend I have seen in several places; he brings a couple of guys , uses them up for two or three years and then they give up as no partnership is seen in the horizon ; when they leave they can not stay in the area as they have non competition clauses so they have to start all over again; he then bring another couple of suckers for the next couple of years and so on. How he can get away with this??? Lots of supply so replacing a doctor is not difficult and you do not have to offer too much for people to take it.
In primary care or hospital medicine is harder to do so ; you have to offer something decent otherwise people will go somewhere else. Nephrology docs do not have that option.
Do not blame practices for hiring PAs or NPs; unfortunately workforce policy is dictated by academics that have no idea how a business is run. For us to survive we have to maximize productivity and use of resources. In academic medicine your main financial worry is to get a paycheck; we have to pay benefits, employees, generate payroll , pay taxes, comply with hundreds and hundreds of regulations with lower reimbursement.
It is funny; my program is a big advocate of the "nephrologist shortage theory" so they needed nephrologists and they replaced them with NPs however they do not take call or work on weekends. Solution? The hospital sponsored 2 more fellowship positions with its own money as fellows are cheaper than NPs or PAs with no limit on how much you can work them up.
Do you have to be crazy going into nephrology these days? Yes you have to but lack of common sense and being prone to make irrational decisions is a very common human behavior. Do whatever you want; at the end is your problem dealing with your own frustrations. Here @ SDN we told you so.