- Joined
- Mar 6, 2005
- Messages
- 21,368
- Reaction score
- 17,873
1st block, at least 75% correct,
2nd block, at least 70% correct,
3rd block, at least 75% correct,
4th block, at least 70% correct.
i found blocks 2 and 4 more difficult. i think i passed the threshold. definately agree, mksap was not enough. this exam requires you to dig very deep. it requires a great understanding from multiple sources. you need to get information from multiple angles, and it has that many more ways of sticking in your head. i got some Qs right from mksap, some more from Uworld, some more from awesome review, some more from the other board review sources (Johns Hopkins board review, medstudy). every source of info adding a few more points to the final score. hopefully it was enough. i was the one who scored 142 (69.3% correct) last year and failed. the calculation was correct. not all questions are scored the same, and some questions give them "more information" than others.
notice over the last 5 years, consecutively the average pass rate for 1st time test takers has gone down. From 2007-2011, I believe it was 94%, 91%, 88%, 87%, 84%. Wonder what this year will bring. It seemed harder.
You bring up some interesting points here and I think it can all be put down to what has become an arms race between the test makers and the review companies, with the examinees stuck in the middle. You're definitely correct that MKSAP is not enough. Neither (probably, although I have no data to back up this assertion) is any other single review source. And that's because, as there are now so many review sources (you listed 6 in your post alone) that the test writers feel the need to make the exam more difficult to avoid rewarding people who are just really good at memorizing review materials and focus instead on people who are "good doctors."
To quote Pogo (from way before my time even), "we have met the enemy, and he is us."