I thought the scores were supposed to be adjusted so that the mean was 70 and SD was 8?
I'm reporting it how my school reported it. School score was a 99, NBME score was a 96 with a mean of 76 and an SD of 8
I thought the scores were supposed to be adjusted so that the mean was 70 and SD was 8?
We got an email about the scaled score thing. The scaled score is worthless. As one progresses through the year, the scaled score increases. Evidently, the scaled of 70 being 50% was in the 1990s and they just never adjusted it. There is fight to stop the BS with scaled scores on NBME junk since it is misleading...kind of like that 2 digit step 1 score.
Agree. Let me make this concept more explicit:I would highly recommend "Pocket Medicine" and get the most recent edition. It literally has everything you need to know but it isn't something you can really study or memorize. However I did like to read through it when I had nothing going on or whenever I had a question about a patient. Likely all your residents have this.
You could also carry case files around but I would never go without pocket medicine.
It was ridiculous. I've never seen so many bs questions. Nothing high yield. I used step up & mksap4. I have no clue how I did which was basically the sentiment from my classmates as well.
Hey guys,
I am not familiar with UWorld.
Is there a special section on there for the IM shelf?
Or do you just do the Step 1 questions?
Yeah it was pretty rough. It seemed like there were always 2 or 3 things pushing one diagnosis and then a couple things pushing to a different answer choice. O pues, such is life.Same here...I walked in feeling confident having done most of MKSAP (averaged about 80% correct) and having multiple attendings and residents telling me "I would have no problem whatsoever" with the shelf based on their pimping. Looks like neither are a good predictor hehe.
In addition to tons of convoluted questions, the length and construction of many question stems were ludicrous and made things as confusing as possible...necessitating multiple read-throughs of the question. Thanks to this, I ran out of time--did 30 questions in 15 minutes at the end and had to bubble "d" for an additional 6 questions in the last minute. The four or five classmates I chatted with after also ran out of time and all had to randomly bubble in 3-5 questions at the end. Oy.
It was ridiculous. I've never seen so many bs questions. Nothing high yield. I used step up & mksap4. I have no clue how I did which was basically the sentiment from my classmates as well.
I just started my 8 week medicine rotation, and was thinking of taking a different approach. I am a VERY slow reader, and have trouble getting through lengthy texts. I don't see myself finishing Step Up to Medicine and UWorld in this 2 months, especially with my rotation hours.
From reading the thread, I can see that questions are crucial in doing well on the shelf. I was considering doing the following:
-Reading Step Up to Step 2 (parts that are pertinent to IM)
-Doing Uworld and annotating into SUS2
-Possibly MKSAP 4 If I get the time
I am also considering watching DIT videos for the pertinent parts of SUS2. Has anyone used SUS2 for this shelf? Any thoughts?
can someone please tell me which MKSAP to buy? people keep mentioning 3, 4, and 5. and what is the difference between them? should i buy more than one? please let me know asap! thanks!
where did you buy them? why are they like over a hundred dollars???
Question for folks that studied using USMLE World qbank...
did you do ALL the questions under the "internal medicine" section?
under "internal medicine", there are subsections on detailed things like "neurology" and "opthalmology" that I have been doing, they are admittedly pretty difficult. Some people in my class advocate not doing those more specialized questions.
what do you folks think? do I need to know the difference between and open angle glaucoma and narrow angle glaucoma for the internal medicine shelf?
many thanks.
For those debating about MKSAP, I would highly recommend UWorld questions instead. I did all of MKSAP 4 and several hundred UWorld questions when I was studying for this shelf and found that UWorld was by and far better. I think this is because MKSAP has random way too easy questions that waste time. Also, UWorld explanations are better (more thoroughly explained). MKSAP had less consistent quality in the question explanations.
I'm just doing them all, along with Kaplan step 2 question book and an internal med review book.
Then you have way more willpower than I do or have way more free time during your clerkship (or both), haha.
I have an ipad with the uworld app, kaplan step 2 qbook and then the mksap 5 page saved. Whenever I have downtime or am stuck in mandatory lectures, I just do questions. It is pretty easy to rip off 30-40 a day that way and then I may do another 300 over the weekend if I'm not rounding.
I'm a question learner/study person though. I look up stuff in step up once in a while, but I feel I get much more out of thinking through problems.
how many EKG's do you usually have to interpret on the IM shelf? I am asking because my EKG reading skills are not the best. I'm wondering if I should spend a few days brushing up on them.
And when and EKG is given, are all of the leads given? Or only the pertinent ones needed to make the Dx?
I had one EKG and it was a very obvious anterior wall STEMI. They're not gonna be ridiculously tough EKGs and yes all of the leads were given (though I can imagine for an EKG showing something like peaked T waves for hyperkalemia you don't need all the leads).