Hey everyone! I just signed up for Sept. 10th! Looking forward to working with all of you this summer.
I'll be using a combination of 9th EK series, 2016 TBR (excluding verbal and psych), TPR psych/soc, and a TPRH verbal book.
Having said that, I'm a little conflicted as to how I should approach my content review because I've been out of school for 3 years. I was advised to use TBR as my main content review because of how detailed the books are and they're supposed to be great for people that haven't had any prereq exposure in quite some time. I started with TBR Gen. Chem CH1. and would read the examples and solutions without attempting to do the examples myself. I later went on SDN and other members advised that you should be attempting to do the examples first before looking at the solutions. My problem is that since I forgot most of the content I don't even know how to begin attempting the examples without looking at the solutions. I feel like I'm not getting much done just by reading the solutions to the examples and then trying to attempt the passages at the end of the chapter.
Then there's the EK series. I love how concise and straight to the point the chapters are. I also like the fact that they take into account the MCAT passage questions are now based on scientific research articles. It seems that TBR didn't address that part at all from what I've seen so far. So if one was to solely rely on TBR passages then they wouldn't be ready to dissect the research based passages on the real MCAT.
I feel like if I use TBR for my main content review then I'll be good with the material but then I won't know how to apply the knowledge to research based passages on the MCAT. Then if I use EK I'm worried that when test day arrives I'll run into topics I never covered. What's a guy supposed to do?!
Sorry for the lengthy post
EDIT:
@BerkReviewTeach If you can chime in, would be much appreciated!