Ortho technical difficulty

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Dr mann212

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2016
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I over heard some people ( not sure who they were) arguing about orthopedic surgery vs other surgical fields in terms of technical difficulty/ability. One of them kept saying orthopods are not nearly as technically savvy as other surgical fields, saying ortho procedures are "easy" in comparison to other fields. Im sure he is misinformed or just an ass, but his words did bring some questions to mind.

1. How technically difficult is ortho in comparison to other surgical fields? More specifically, how difficult are
Achilles tendon repairs and acl reconstructions? Also muscle ruptures and tears?

2. I have heard of rural general surgeons doing acl reconstructions and other tendon/ligament repairs. Did they receive comprehensive training in these procedures, or are they just relatively easy procedures that dont require volume to become competent doing them?

3. If the previously stated procedures arent very difficult, why do general surgeons in more urban communities not get to do them at all? Is it because ortho just does them much better, or is it to give ortho more operative volume?

Forgive my ignorance, any and all replies are greatly appreciated!

Members don't see this ad.
 
Surgery, overall, is not that technically demanding - by which I mean, most people are capable of being a surgeon with appropriate training and dedication. Surgery, of all sorts, is at least 75% cognitive - who to operate on, what operation to do, how to deal with variations of anatomy and pathology, and how to deal with unforeseen troubles and complications. Within all the surgical specialties I know reasonably well (general surgery, orthopaedic surgery, plastic surgery, vascular surgery, urology, head and neck surgery, neurosurgery) there are straight-forward procedures and more technically challenging ones.

For your examples, Achilles tendon repairs are not very challenging (and, also, the nearly overwhelming evidence suggests that nonoperative treatment is equivalent to operative treatment), while an ACL reconstruction requires experience and expertise in tunnel creation and graft tensioning to maximize outcome. I wouldn't be surprised if some rural surgeons or surgeons with less fragmented medical systems do Achilles tendon repairs (again, I'm not saying these should be repaired). Most ACL reconstructions, however, are done using arthroscopy and require tendon harvesting and/or preparing as well as bone drilling and suspending that general surgeons are not exposed to during training. Also, in the US at least, a general surgeon would probably not be able to get hospital privileges to do an ACL reconstruction - it is outside the scope of their training and expertise. Simple ankle/wrist fractures are easy, acetabular fractures and busted tibial plateau/pilon fractures are hard. While straight forward primary knee and hip replacements are something most people can learn to do reasonably well, revision joint replacements with bone loss can be quite difficult.

Likewise for the other specialties - most appendectomies are straight-forward, and there are even programs where family medicine doctors learn to do these as well as simple hernias, in addition to c-sections. A big recurrent ventral hernia, or a gastric bypass operation, in contrast, are challenging technically. For plastic surgery (and for orthopaedic hand surgeons), microscopic free tissue transfers and finger replantations are technically challenging, while split thickness skin grafting is not. And so on. Good news for trainees - I'd say pick a field based on your passion for it, the patients, and the pathology. It is unlikely you can't operate - but you may decide you are better suited to get really good at a small number of straight-forward operations, or you may decide you prefer complex technically challenging operations... these exist in all surgical fields.

Whoever you overheard was making an over-generalization. Hard and easy surgeries exist for all, but overall surgery is something most people can learn to do if willing to spend the time and effort.

Part of your question was about specialty boundary formation - why do orthopaedists do Achilles tendon repairs and not general surgeons? Why is spine split between orthopaedics and neurosurgeons? It might surprise you that general surgeons used to take care of fractures in the United States, and that in some countries there are trauma specialists who care for fractures as well as ruptured spleens and traumatic bowel injuries. This is an interesting topic, and specialty boundaries are always in flux. 75 years ago there was no arthroscopy, no joint replacement, and a lot of trauma was done by general surgeons... orthopaedics has changed a lot. And it probably will in the future too. It isn't just as simple as "Well, knowledge has increased so people have to specialize more and more" - that explains specialization overall, but not how it happens, who ends up doing something instead of someone else, etc.

If you are really interested, there are several books on it. Here are a few:

- For physical medicine and rehabilitation, which has cut away a reasonably large part of what orthopaedists used to do, see:
Gritzer and Arluke, The making of rehabilitation
- For a medical specialization example there is Fye, American Cardiology
- For orthopaedics itself, there are two to consider.
1. a longer one, UK based: Cooter, Surgery and Society in Peace and War
2. a shorter one, US based: Gundle, Rearticulations of Orthopaedic Surgery
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Very insightful. Thank you so much for answering my questions!
 
Top