Niiiice discussions went on in here!
I used to take stock in vet school rankings (my mom thought I should attempt to get into Cornell undergrad because of their reputation/SVM ranking. I was not at all interested in trying for an ivy but wanted to go to CSU partly because they were always ranked at #2), but I got that bit of "Cornell or Caribbean" advice from TheExoticVet's blog on tumblr, and I've seen it echoed elsewhere on the web by other practicing vets as well.
I don't think they meant to suggest that
"all schools are EQUAL" per se. There are obviously tons of factors that go into one's choice of school(s) and reasons for not applying indiscriminately--location and costs, different emphasis on particular areas/programs, etc...and I'm sure that in the case of Cornell and the like, you may indeed end up being viewed with a sort of prestige over others (warranted or not) just by the nature of those schools' reputations. Main point is, when it comes to the bottom line (your
education) it's not really going to change...that you're not somehow going to end up a crappy poorly-educated vet by attending a state/Caribbean/international school, any more than attending a prestigious school guarantees you'll be "better educated/prepared," because they all meet the same standards curriculum. In THAT sense there is no "superior/top ranked/best school," though there will obviously be superiors among different aspects, programs and quality of facilities. Cornell is just one of the examples he used,
to say that in the end a DVM degree is a DVM degree (assuming US accreditation) and there should be no inherent stigma against internationals on that basis.
And yeah, individual anecdotes of graduates from different schools being "better" could never be some kind of basis for this school being better than that one.