Perceived difference in caliber of student between top 20 and ranked 20-40 school?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Bulbasaur

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
82
Reaction score
52
Are the criteria for getting into a top 20 school THAT much harder than for getting into a rank 20-40 school?

Members don't see this ad.
 
You do need stronger EC's for higher ranked schools and median MCAT is maybe 1-3 points higher.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Woah woah woah. Legend of Dragoon avatar?

Haha, good catch. Absolutely love that game...

To answer the OP's question, if anything the "top 20" schools are more competitive simply as a result of a numbers game. There are likely many more people that add the "top 20" schools to their lists as reaches because... why not? There's no harm in doing so short of the cost to do so, and who knows, maybe it'll work out. It's also difficult as the strongest applicants will typically apply to most or all of these institutions while they likely won't apply to many of the lesser ranked schools.

I don't think there's anything in particular that you "have" to have to get into a top 20 vs. a non-top 20. The reality is, though, that those schools have the ability to be pickier about the students they accept because the applicant pool is that much stronger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Haha, good catch. Absolutely love that game....

Yeah! Possibly one of my favorite games ever. The 'battles' were pretty interesting due to the combo timer thing. Completely unlike any other RPG.

I'm hankering to get FF7 and an emulator for my PC and have at it during my ample free time... (hah!).
 
My perceived difference would be:
-more likely to have gone to a better undergrad
-more likely to have done research

....And that's it. I know a few people that went to top 20 schools vs. top 40 schools and there is no clear difference in terms of intelligence or work ethic.

Top 40 vs. non-top 40: you start to see a little difference but both student bodies still have ranges that overlap quite a bit so it's still a little silly to extrapolate that to one individual.

Top 20 vs. under top 40: yes, the difference is noticeable. But there's still decent overlap even here.
 
Last edited:
There are definitely a lot of very smart people in my class, but I'd say the most striking thing to me is just how enthralled everyone seems to be with research. Many won't ever end up in academia but it still seems to be a pretty "academic" leaning bunch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top