From Sabiston's Textbook of Surgery (please excuse the length):
There is general consensus that a localized appendiceal abscess from perforated appendicitis can be initially managed with CT-guided percutaneous drainage or limited surgical drainage. When the drainage is combined with adequate antibiotic and fluid administration, most patients will respond to this conservative management and can be discharged without fever or abdominal pain. Controversy exists, however, as to whether interval appendectomy (performing an elective appendectomy in the interval between bouts of appendicitis) is necessary to prevent recurrent bouts of appendicitis. In one study that compared early with delayed appendectomy after appendiceal mass formation, 15% of the patients in the delayed group had a recurrent acute episode during the waiting period. The authors concluded that despite a slightly higher incidence of wound infection in the early appendectomy group, it appeared safe and cost effective to remove the appendix early rather than waiting 6 to 10 weeks"
"In one long-term follow-up of patients with an appendiceal mass treated nonoperatively, only 1 of 10 patients required appendectomy. The rest remained asymptomatic with their appendix intact.[36] The risk of recurrent appendicitis must be balanced against the risk of interval appendectomy. In general, the younger the patient, the higher the lifetime risk of recurrent appendicitis and the lower the operative risk. Although many pediatric surgeons (including ourselves) perform interval appendectomy routinely at 8 to 12 weeks in children, the risk in patients older than 30 to 40 years of age probably would not support this policy."
****
Coincidentally, we had a patient recently with a similar scenario, i.e. symptomatic appendicial abscess. They operated. In conference this AM, however, they discussed whether nonoperative management could be done. It's still controversial (as the book suggests) and depends on the particulars of the scenario.