- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Messages
- 39,646
- Reaction score
- 29,705
I was going to correct my phone's mistype of interesting to ingesting, but I'm not going to because it is funny.
I think I died because MQ voted for me and she was the crocodile...so I only needed that one vote to die
If your science starts behaving and you play, you will very much enjoy the games I have in the works.I definitely appreciated that this game mirrored in part SOV and I's noob game in that revealing yourself as the first defense could lead to death as a consequence. Gotta learn to defend your play and not rely on role and ability as the reason not to lynch, and those doing the questioning have to learn to read those defenses instead of ignoring everything said until a reveal is forced.
Had fun posting silly gifs as always!
This comment was definitely necessary and contributed positively to the thread.Another prevet WW wolf win? Amazing!
I am curious as to why I was lynched that first time, though. Was it because Tinkerbell voted for me? Or because it was unanimous?
Faction games aren't much my thing. Never have liked them.
But good going wolves, I guess.... probably a couple too many for appropriate balance, but it is what it is.
Definitely some ingesting mechanics this game. I'm just glad people actually died.
Shouldn't be able to boost conversionHonest curiosity for the sake of future planning . . . by a couple too many wolves, do you mean originals or converts? The wolves could convert every 3 days (and only after an unaffiliated pirate had died), but they got really lucky with boosts on conversion nights. It started with three originals. Would it have been more balanced with only 2 originals, or did you mean 1 original?
I was so paranoid about having everything balanced. It's definitely a learning experience.
With 25 people, imo, 3 wolves + 2 converts or 4 wolves + 1 convert would be max.
As a vague general rule of thumb that I use is to make ending # of total wolves (originals + converts) no more than 20-25% of the players. So in a 25 person game, 5 wolves total. This will vary sometimes depending on mechanics, but that's a rough role for me.
This comment was definitely necessary and contributed positively to the thread.
No, seriously. Why? In what way did that post help PBC? In what way did that make the thread any better? Because from my couch it just looks like someone who didn't even play the game stopping by and being a bit of a dick.
No, seriously. Why? In what way did that post help PBC? In what way did that make the thread any better? Because from my couch it just looks like someone who didn't even play the game stopping by and being a bit of a dick.
Your follow up post was super helpful. That wasn't, and it surprised me from you.
Meh. I just dealt with a bunch of people constantly crapping on a game, and I found it very not-fun from the mod perspective. People pointing out specific flaws and discussing them is one thing, but someone swooping in at the end of the game for no reason other than to make a snarky comment about it would be unenjoyable to me, so I responded to it. That's all. I'm not saying every post on the forum needs to be helpful.Sarcasm, Trilt. Snark, Trilt. It's just being snarky. Calm yourself down. If you were here in MN, I would throw you a special little Chill Pill that Dyachei gave me when she visited. It wasn't intended as a "OMG THIS MOD SUX!" post, and I doubt PBC took it that way. Especially since it wasn't even aimed at PBC.
Not every post <has> to be helpful. Sometimes snark is just snark. I mean... was your follow-up post "super helpful"? No. So.... you going to attack yourself, too?
You going to go reply to WTF's most recent thread about pre-vet being all about medicine and point out that it's not helpful? Because it's not. (But it's snarky and funny.)
Relax.
Meh. I just dealt with a bunch of people constantly crapping on a game, and I found it very not-fun from the mod perspective. People pointing out specific flaws and discussing them is one thing, but someone swooping in at the end of the game for no reason other than to make a snarky comment about it would be unenjoyable to me, so I responded to it. That's all. I'm not saying every post on the forum needs to be helpful.
I take no credit for that game, lol, beyond getting fairly sleep deprived and grumpy running it.That's fair. But unless you're going to post an unhelpful attack in response to every post by everyone who isn't meeting your criteria for helpfulness (i.e. unless you're going to be consistent in responding to everyone else and not just me), I think you should just relax and let it go and take it as it was intended - a snarky comment aimed at all of us (including me).
Besides. I didn't crap on your game. So there.
I take no credit for that game, lol, beyond getting fairly sleep deprived and grumpy running it.
re: the rest, I will engage my inner let it go sloth as much as I can.
Is the Let It Go sloth 2-toed or 3-toed?
More importantly - can he fly?Is the Let It Go sloth 2-toed or 3-toed?
I actually was in wolf chat the whole time and knew who every wolf was. My only ability was to kill once for the wolves, but I did my best not to favor them and tried to balance my trolling to both sides.
I was messing with them behind the scenes, you don't even know
I thought we was friends.....I was messing with them behind the scenes, you don't even know
awww, don't make me feel bad. All's fair in love and WW!I thought we was friends.....
Sniffle sniff. SOBawww, don't make me feel bad. All's fair in love and WW!
I'll make it up to you next time we're playing the same game You were my mentor, after allSniffle sniff. SOB
I'm so heartbroken. Your words mean nothing, padawan.I'll make it up to you next time we're playing the same game You were my mentor, after all
Sorry, what were their role abilities, as it was never posted on the thread (yes I just read all 19 pages)*were