I have heard quite of assumptions of the pros/cons of DO schools... I just wanted to know what you guys all thought
I have heard quite of assumptions of the pros/cons of DO schools... I just wanted to know what you guys all thought
There are cons?
Pros: Women will hump your junk.
Cons: Men might hump your junk.
If gay or a woman, switch those two.
If bisexual then for the love of christ get into a DO school STAT.
I have heard quite of assumptions of the pros/cons of DO schools... I just wanted to know what you guys all thought
I have heard quite of assumptions of the pros/cons of DO schools... I just wanted to know what you guys all thought
Pros: Women will hump your junk.
Cons: Men might hump your junk.
If gay or a woman, switch those two.
If bisexual then for the love of christ get into a DO school STAT.
i hate these threads theres a new one everyday
pros: you're a doctor
cons: some 18 year old, world of warcraft fan will tell you it's impossible to become a dermatologist over the interweb.
First off the biggest difference between DO and MD is that the DO's get trained in OMM. This leads to some differences in their boards. The USMLE puts more attention on biochemistry than the COMLEX does. Other than that there is little difference.
Jagger, you seem to forget that his uncle IS a radiologist, and thus a leading expert on professional perception of all DO's in the medical field.
5) If people are actually still reading this, realize that many pre-meds search these threads and find 100 other threads where everyone says its already been answered, is sarcastic, and does not give a real answer. Therefore I would encourage to give an answer, rather than contribute to this. I may be guilty of this as well, but its worth noting.
That is all.
Jagger, you seem to forget that his uncle IS a radiologist, and thus a leading expert on professional perception of all DO's in the medical field.
i agree with you. People are wayyy too sarcastic on this site.... Like they have nothing else to do but to kill time posting silly comments on this forum.
I agree with you. People are wayyy too sarcastic on this site.... like they have nothing else to do but to kill time posting silly comments on this forum. While it may be amusing and humorous at times, it is a huge time waste for those of us who are busy, and have to go through multiple cynical posts just to get a real answer to a question. Some of us do come to this site to find real answers (and gladly share our knowledge with others as well), not simply out of boredom. I don't want to be hypocritical, as I'm sure I may have a cynical post or two from the past, but I try to stay fairly helpful.
Pros: You're still a Doc, the field is not as discriminated against anymore (except for some that are pretty much ignorant on the topic), most DOs are more down to earth and friendly (but I think it's just the person many times), OMM (there's discussion on this as well with the current trends), seeing the patient as a whole person (discussions on this as well), accepts those that are non-traditional students more frequently it seems, get to take two licensing exams if you choose to do so, etc.
Cons: Might occasionally run into the individual who's still ignorant on DOs vs MDs, might run into issues with matching for residencies for some specialties (can be overcome by applying vastly with my understanding), can't really think of many others
DO allows you to manipulate and palpitate the goods, aka your classmates. Only if the butcher shop let you massage the rump roast before buying it.
Well, that settles it for me...
But seriously, the only major con I can think of is that DO school often costs more (not in all cases. But here TouroNV is about 33 K/yr and UNR is 13 K/yr for instate). Pros for me would be that there seems to be more nontrads, I would love to learn OMM, and being able to go for either a DO or MD residency.
One of the cons in going down the osteopathic route is the lack of recognition/acceptance of the degree outside the states. My understanding is that a DO would have significant hurdles to jump if he/she wished to practice abroad.
One of the cons in going down the osteopathic route is the lack of recognition/acceptance of the degree outside the states. My understanding is that a DO would have significant hurdles to jump if he/she wished to practice abroad.
One of the cons in going down the osteopathic route is the lack of recognition/acceptance of the degree outside the states. My understanding is that a DO would have significant hurdles to jump if he/she wished to practice abroad.
False. If there was trouble going abroad, schools such as DMU wouldnt have global health programs. Thats just one example.
If you are comparing to public MD schools for IS applicants, then yes DO is going to be more expensive, but you can also say that for private MDs or OOS public MDs. If you compare private MD with private DO, they are very similar.
One of the cons in going down the osteopathic route is the lack of recognition/acceptance of the degree outside the states. My understanding is that a DO would have significant hurdles to jump if he/she wished to practice abroad.
This is a confusing issue, though. If you mean practice abroad as in doing medical mission type work through an established organization such as Doctors without Borders, or the like, then you are going to be fine no matter which country you do the work in. You aren't going to be limited by degree for medical mission type work. However, if you want to live in another country and practice permanently there, then, yes, your ability to have your degree recognized can vary. It could be a significant consideration, depending on what country you are talking about. Nevertheless, the list of international practice rights for DO's, continues to grow.
Keep in mind, though, that it takes a bit a work to actually get licensed and to establish a practice in another country, no matter whether you are an MD or a DO. It is a misconception to think that you can just walk in with your MD or DO degree and start practicing permanently in another country. There are usually specific guidelines that must be followed and probably licensing exams that need to be taken, and other hoops that need to be jumped through, etc.
Average allopathic debt is 111k and average osteopathic debt is 155k.
One of the cons in going down the osteopathic route is the lack of recognition/acceptance of the degree outside the states. My understanding is that a DO would have significant hurdles to jump if he/she wished to practice abroad.
Well put, and does this really count as a justification, since the US is still one of the most highly respected countries in terms of our medical practices? I don't know about many others, but I have a feeling that by the time I really, truly care about moving to say Britain or Ireland things will already be resolved in terms of the DO route. For that which interests me the most, WHO and the like (Doctors without Boarders), both both respect the DO as being an equivalent to an MD. Personally, I'm starting to wonder if they are just grasping for straws in this debate and not finding much to grasp for in terms of disqualifying the DO route.Is it me or do a large number of people that compare the differences between MD/DO always bring up the ability to practice internationally. I don't know about you, but all the pre-meds at my school (including myself) don't care about international licensure. Besides mission work (which DO's are granted to do), how many of those people that cite this difference actually intend on living outside the US? Yes, it is a difference (which as someone posted is diminishing day by day), but is it really that much of problem? Are MDs/DOs graduating and moving abroad? If so, why are so many IMGs/FMGs coming into the US to practice?
To me is just seemed like another justification to not go the DO route.
Is it me or do a large number of people that compare the differences between MD/DO always bring up the ability to practice internationally. I don't know about you, but all the pre-meds at my school (including myself) don't care about international licensure. Besides mission work (which DO's are granted to do), how many of those people that cite this difference actually intend on living outside the US? Yes, it is a difference (which as someone posted is diminishing day by day), but is it really that much of problem? Are MDs/DOs graduating and moving abroad? If so, why are so many IMGs/FMGs coming into the US to practice?
To me is just seemed like another justification to not go the DO route.
I hate people touching me is ridiculous.
The ONLY reason premeds don't like it is because it is different letters and people don't like "different". If it is different then it MUST be inferior. duh
My biggest thing was that I really don't care about OMM. I am slightly intrigued in it but the level I hate people touching me is ridiculous.
Of course .01% of people who say they actually want to live/practice outside the US will ... it's just young dreaming. Kinda like how every 18 year old is worried about how to become a dermatologist who also lectures at an Ivy league University during some days of the week and does Neurosurgery on the side.Just big thoughts that will fade when reality kicks in ...
May be they saw Sanjay Gupta? I mean the guy does TV reporting and occasional neurosurgery on the side.