About the ads

  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

question about i-brite procedure

Discussion in 'Ophthalmology: Eye Physicians & Surgeons' started by daphilster78, Sep 18, 2012.

  1. This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors and sponsors. Thank you.
  1. daphilster78

    daphilster78 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    44
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    SDN 7+ Year Member

    SDN Members don't see this ad. (About Ads)
    Hey Guys,

    I'm asking for your advice, got an ophtho question (I'm a physician but in an unrelated field). So my right eye has always had a patch of large blood vessels and a small 'pinguecula' according to a couple opthalmologists I've seen, who basically told me to ignore the red appearance as its still 'healthy.' Nonetheless, it does bothers me and I've had some of my pts ask me if I have pink eye, esp since it can be bright red at the end of the day.

    Anyhow I looked into options and found only one or two ophthalmologists with websites describing surgeries to reduce the appearance of prominent blood vessels. One guy is Dr Brian Boxer-Wachler who invented the i-brite procedure.

    http://www.boxerwachler.com/whiteeyes/
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfRmCIpBXBA&feature=related


    My question is, how safe is this procedure? I know not many ophthalmologists do this. I had a consult with Dr Boxer-Wachler and he saws he removes the entire conjunctiva and then uses some mitomycin C for a few days. Is this safe? Is this a similar procedure as one would do for pterygium removal?

    Thanks for any input.
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2012
  2. Dusn

    Dusn

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    168
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    SDN 2+ Year Member
    Any ophthalmologists, and especially any anterior segment surgeon, should have the skill set needed to do this (because like you said it looks similar to pterygium removals); however, the vast majority believe that the risks for a cosmetic procedure like this outweigh the benefits. The risks with mitomycin c and removal of large areas of conjunctiva include limbal stem cell deficiency, corneal melt, scleral melt, recurrence or worsening of the same cosmetic problem, dry eye, vision loss... etc.
  3. daphilster78

    daphilster78 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    44
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    SDN 7+ Year Member
    Thanks for the info Dusn. I'm leaning against this, but you pointed me toward important questions to ask: whether he's had any of the complications you mentioned. Overall, I notice one thing he advertises is that a "brand new" conjunctiva layer will regenerate over time. Is this true? And I wonder why he doesn't use amniotic membrane transplant like they do for pterygium surgery.
  4. MR1

    MR1

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2006
    Messages:
    406
    Status:
    Fellow [Any Field]
    SDN 7+ Year Member
    My opinion. Do not have the I-brite. That is a lot of conj removed. It does not grow back. The bare sclera epithelializes over. There are significant long term risks to that whether anyone will admit it.

    If you want a ping removed go to a cornea surgeon and ask about local resection like we do with pterygium.
  5. daphilster78

    daphilster78 Junior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    44
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    SDN 7+ Year Member
    Thanks MR1, yes at this point it looks like there isn't enough info on long term outcomes. Also there aren't any peer reviewed publications of this procedure.

    If I do go for a focal removal of a pinguecula, any recs on a good cornea surgeon in Los Angeles/OC area? I'll PM you.
  6. bambi7

    bambi7

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    15
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    SDN 2+ Year Member
    I have seen a couple of I-brite patients who have had terrible complications. Don't do it.
  7. sven

    sven Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2004
    Messages:
    155
    SDN 7+ Year Member
    Some of the prominent corneal specialists at my institution have extreme reservations about the i-brite procedure and contacted Dr. Boxer-Wachler seeking clarification on a number of points. He never responded. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone in the mainstream of opthalmology who would call the risk/benefit ratio acceptable. Simple, non-irritated pingueculae are usually slightly elevated and discolored. Vascularity can be prominent, but before considering surgery you might want to be sure that you don't have an irritated pinguiculum or 'pinguiculitis.' This condition often responds well to a short course of mild steroid drops (e.g. FML) and/or aggressive lubrication. Also, is it exacerbated by CL wear, etc.? After surgery you'd need a prolonged course of topical steroids anyway...

Share This Page


About the ads