So I know that Derm and Plastics are hard to match into, but what really irked me recently was looking at the match list for Derm and Plastics in the last two years: it appears that two IMGs have matched in Derm and Plastics respectively, both after waiting for more than a decade doing research, churning out 1-3 mediocre publications in low-impact journals and then getting lucky by matching in plastics or derm. Both are graduates of a foreign (Asian) medical school. Non-US citizens.
I guess what I wanted to know is, how common is it for an IMG who graduated in 1998 to match into a competitive residency spot 15 years later? Even a monkey can be trained to do mediocre research and publish in a random journal. Its sad that they are being accepted over US grads with much more recent experience, better credentials and a better understanding of cultural mores and bedside manner.
Now that these 2 IMGs have matched, what are the chances that they will actually get to stay in the US permanently so that they can practice here? A quick look at the the IMG stats shows that we have 1,000 IMGs from one country alone - how many of these IMGs actually stay here permanently to practice? 100? 50? Even less? How many will get green cards upon completing their residency? Just curious. Thanks.
Are there residencies that don't accept any IMGs? Fields that have close to ~0 IMGs currently practicing in the US? I would love to practice in a field that is at least somewhat exclusive and not open to being outsourced anytime soon. Also, I don't particularly like the idea of a specialty being saturated with IMGs from other countries -- in fact, I am surprised others don't see how unpalatable that idea really is. It would be a horrible situation for all parties involved.
Also, is it fair to say that IMGs from non-Carib/non-European/Australian medical schools who graduate near or at the top of their class are equal to a US allopathic grad in competence? Or perhaps better?
I would tend to disagree vehemently; not just because of the poor infrastructure and dismal state of teaching in these schools (outdated teaching modalities, horrible professors, ancient books, no emphasis on contemporary learning tools) but because of the fairly low standards for admission- they base the admissions decision solely on the results on a single examination, disregarding every other objectively measurable metric available for the applicant, not to mention things like social skills, commitment for and passion for medicine, and demonstrated interest in the field. Plus these people take a couple years to prepare for this examination, and they still don't get anywhere near the perfect score (but still get in).
I wanted to get opinions from other people on the board: have you had experiences that would corroborate the aforementioned? Any dissenting opinions? Thanks!
I guess what I wanted to know is, how common is it for an IMG who graduated in 1998 to match into a competitive residency spot 15 years later? Even a monkey can be trained to do mediocre research and publish in a random journal. Its sad that they are being accepted over US grads with much more recent experience, better credentials and a better understanding of cultural mores and bedside manner.
Now that these 2 IMGs have matched, what are the chances that they will actually get to stay in the US permanently so that they can practice here? A quick look at the the IMG stats shows that we have 1,000 IMGs from one country alone - how many of these IMGs actually stay here permanently to practice? 100? 50? Even less? How many will get green cards upon completing their residency? Just curious. Thanks.
Are there residencies that don't accept any IMGs? Fields that have close to ~0 IMGs currently practicing in the US? I would love to practice in a field that is at least somewhat exclusive and not open to being outsourced anytime soon. Also, I don't particularly like the idea of a specialty being saturated with IMGs from other countries -- in fact, I am surprised others don't see how unpalatable that idea really is. It would be a horrible situation for all parties involved.
Also, is it fair to say that IMGs from non-Carib/non-European/Australian medical schools who graduate near or at the top of their class are equal to a US allopathic grad in competence? Or perhaps better?
I would tend to disagree vehemently; not just because of the poor infrastructure and dismal state of teaching in these schools (outdated teaching modalities, horrible professors, ancient books, no emphasis on contemporary learning tools) but because of the fairly low standards for admission- they base the admissions decision solely on the results on a single examination, disregarding every other objectively measurable metric available for the applicant, not to mention things like social skills, commitment for and passion for medicine, and demonstrated interest in the field. Plus these people take a couple years to prepare for this examination, and they still don't get anywhere near the perfect score (but still get in).
I wanted to get opinions from other people on the board: have you had experiences that would corroborate the aforementioned? Any dissenting opinions? Thanks!
Last edited: