- Joined
- Jul 12, 2007
- Messages
- 723
- Reaction score
- 22
-As an outpatient specialty, just curious as to what makes the derm residency harder/malignant at some places vs. other places. I feel like most people, having the option/interest/credentials, would take a "malignant" derm program over doing an internal medicine or gen surgery residency any day of the week.
-Additionally, I'm just trying to think of the intrinsic factors as to what motivates one person choose (or not choose) a more prestigious derm program over another. Matching into derm is hard in itself and certain factors are definitely pretty important in medicine/surgery (volume and types of cases, autonomy, hospital resources, didactics, better fellowship opportunities, academic career, etc...) but usually not discussed when applying to derm.
Hence my two questions really are:
1.) If you're not going into academia, what pushes someone to lean towards or rank higher, based solely on intrinsic qualities, a "more prestigious" program such as UCSF Penn Yale Michigan NYU Harvard? As a means to an end, does it translate to better opportunities in landing a better procedural fellowship or ultimately job prospects anywhere in the country? Because if not, all I can think about is just...well ego. I may be pessimistic but I just find it hard that harvard can churn out the better community dermatologist than the dermatologist from puerto rico...ok maybe that was extreme but I feel like you get the point.
2.) Just trying to dispel another myth or fact. Why are top tier-research heavy programs (UCSF Penn Yale Michigan NYU Harvard) reputed to have the toughest, most brutal hours (medicine-like) because I am having a tough time understanding this from a curriculum standpoint...Derm clinics (adults, procedural, peds, dermpath) by nature are 8-5/6. Having rotated at some decent mid-tier programs (n of 2), the resident's rotation hours seem relatively standard (8-5/6 at the latest; no weekends). The inpatient consult block, which can last from 8-8/9 mostly with seeing the consults starting in the afternoon, seem to be the busiest aspect of the derm residency.
Take Harvard for example...its curriculum (below) looks similar to the programs (and I am sure many programs elsewhere) that I have rotated at so far (the mix of outpatient services, inpatient, peds, dermpath, procedural, consult service for hospitals, and VA). Not to mention, it looks like harvard has half-day of resident didactics off per week, and some nice, seemingly cush research and teaching months thrown in there.
So really, the only possible reason why I can think of a derm program being "malignant" or "more difficult," correct me if I am naive, are possibly a.) working on weekends or b.) The consult service: having more consult months/longer consult days/consult services stacked on top of doing clinic. Harvard has about 11 required consult months over the span of 3 years but it seems like you strictly do solely just consult.
Schedule:
http://www.hms.harvard.edu/dermatology/training/residency/clinicalrotations/clinicalrotations.html
Didactics:
http://www.hms.harvard.edu/dermatol...onalcurriculum/didacticeducationschedule.html
-Additionally, I'm just trying to think of the intrinsic factors as to what motivates one person choose (or not choose) a more prestigious derm program over another. Matching into derm is hard in itself and certain factors are definitely pretty important in medicine/surgery (volume and types of cases, autonomy, hospital resources, didactics, better fellowship opportunities, academic career, etc...) but usually not discussed when applying to derm.
Hence my two questions really are:
1.) If you're not going into academia, what pushes someone to lean towards or rank higher, based solely on intrinsic qualities, a "more prestigious" program such as UCSF Penn Yale Michigan NYU Harvard? As a means to an end, does it translate to better opportunities in landing a better procedural fellowship or ultimately job prospects anywhere in the country? Because if not, all I can think about is just...well ego. I may be pessimistic but I just find it hard that harvard can churn out the better community dermatologist than the dermatologist from puerto rico...ok maybe that was extreme but I feel like you get the point.
2.) Just trying to dispel another myth or fact. Why are top tier-research heavy programs (UCSF Penn Yale Michigan NYU Harvard) reputed to have the toughest, most brutal hours (medicine-like) because I am having a tough time understanding this from a curriculum standpoint...Derm clinics (adults, procedural, peds, dermpath) by nature are 8-5/6. Having rotated at some decent mid-tier programs (n of 2), the resident's rotation hours seem relatively standard (8-5/6 at the latest; no weekends). The inpatient consult block, which can last from 8-8/9 mostly with seeing the consults starting in the afternoon, seem to be the busiest aspect of the derm residency.
Take Harvard for example...its curriculum (below) looks similar to the programs (and I am sure many programs elsewhere) that I have rotated at so far (the mix of outpatient services, inpatient, peds, dermpath, procedural, consult service for hospitals, and VA). Not to mention, it looks like harvard has half-day of resident didactics off per week, and some nice, seemingly cush research and teaching months thrown in there.
So really, the only possible reason why I can think of a derm program being "malignant" or "more difficult," correct me if I am naive, are possibly a.) working on weekends or b.) The consult service: having more consult months/longer consult days/consult services stacked on top of doing clinic. Harvard has about 11 required consult months over the span of 3 years but it seems like you strictly do solely just consult.
Schedule:
http://www.hms.harvard.edu/dermatology/training/residency/clinicalrotations/clinicalrotations.html
Didactics:
http://www.hms.harvard.edu/dermatol...onalcurriculum/didacticeducationschedule.html