Wow. After this response, I am thoroughly impressed you weren't eaten alive and excreted as waste out the back end of a 3rd level carnivore.
Friend, there's nothing inflated about WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY's MBA program, its nationally ranked and is no cake-walk either.
Regardless, it reveals
nothing about your science ability (but your Cs in chemistry tell
a lot). Also, the name dropping is just plain annoying. Drop it, please. WFU is a good school but west of the Appalachians. you'll get diminishing returns.
The 2.5 was my overall GPA. I got B's in Biology and Physics. A in Calculus, but my Achilles heel are the Chemistry classes I got C's in those. Not proud about it, but its where I am. Doing the MBA to get a good GPA and degree that would help show admission folks I can handle working plus school.
C is for Cooked. Those Bs in the other two prereqs aren't exactly pretty either. Calculus, frankly, doesn't matter. You'd be far better off with a C in Calc, Bs in Physics and Chem and As in Bio. Regardless, most successful applicants have all As in the prereqs (or maybe a B or two in Ochem with all As otherwise).
Achieving an MBA while working is, to be honest, not that impressive. It really proves nothing to an adcom, esp. since MBAs aren't exactly thought of as "academically rigorous." (No matter what you may believe about your program -- heck,
even if it is rigorous, how many adcoms are really going to know your program is that academically rigorous?)
I have been working the past 9+ years at DUKE UNIVERSITY assisting in cancer research. I gotta believe that will count for something. Meeting with Wake Forest Med School Admissions to discuss my options. If they same the same as you I will apologize, until then don't become a motivational speaker!
Honestly, it doesn't. What does "assisting" really mean? Are you a paid research assistant? Have you led any projects yourself? Are you basically a lab tech?
What have you done medically-related?
In 9 years, you had better have accomplished some serious projects.
Honestly, I see little reason in your post that I would want to interview you. What do you have to offer? If I were an adcom, why would I want to interview you over the thousands of 3.6/30+ applicants with excellent ECs, research at excellent universities, more time on their hands to practice medicine (i.e., younger), and no dubious academic past?