I was wondering if anyone knew much about the Rosenberg School of Optometry in San Antonio Texas? If so if they knew what an interview day was like?
Thanks
Thanks
I was wondering if anyone knew much about the Rosenberg School of Optometry in San Antonio Texas? If so if they knew what an interview day was like?
Thanks
i got an interview to this school as well. does anyone know more about the school?
I just received my acceptance for RSO yesterday so if you want any information on the interview I'd be more than happy to help. Class size is small, about 60 and the main clinic is onsite with an additional clinic being built in an area of need. The equipment is about is new as it gets and you name it, they had it. I was very impressed by how the administrative staff seemed to know every current student by name. I do not feel like I will be just a number there or get lost in the shuffle. All of the classes are in the same building with parking right on site. Vast amounts of housing options with in walking distance of campus. They seemed to genuinely care about us as individuals and our success as future optometrists regardless of whether we attended their school or not. As you can see, I am quite sold on RSO, I fell in love with it after my visit and I felt like it had a very conducive environment for success.
Yes, I plan on attending there for sure! I have visited UHCO and have visits scheduled with Nova and Midwestern but I'm not sure I will be attending those since I really felt a connection with RSO and I'm from Texas (less than an hour from RSO) so it makes sense financially. I'm not worried about their accreditation status because they have many other successful professional programs already established and I am sure once they graduate their first class they will get accredited with no hiccups.that sounds great, does that mean you're sold on attending there? did you have any visit with other optom schools yet? my first is with Indiana, then RSO after.
Also, what kind of questions did they ask in the interview?
Yes, I plan on attending there for sure! I have visited UHCO and have visits scheduled with Nova and Midwestern but I'm not sure I will be attending those since I really felt a connection with RSO and I'm from Texas (less than an hour from RSO) so it makes sense financially. I'm not worried about their accreditation status because they have many other successful professional programs already established and I am sure once they graduate their first class they will get accredited with no hiccups.
The interview was with a faculty member and lasted about 30 minutes
My interviewer asked:
Tell me about yourself.
What is an accomplishment you are proud of?
What does it mean to being professional entail?
How do you think an undergraduate and professional program differ?
How did you get interested?
Why is RSO a good fit for you?
What did you learn during shadowing?
How do you manage stress?
How would your friends describe you?
What would you bring to a professional program?
My tip for you: The interview technically starts when you walk in the door, ask questions in the holding room, participate in discussion, be memorable because the people in the holding room are some of the ones that will be reviewing your file.
I'm not worried about their accreditation status because they have many other successful professional programs already established and I am sure once they graduate their first class they will get accredited with no hiccups.
I wouldn't be so sure on this point. The ACOE is under a lot of pressure from practicing ODs to increase standards for OD programs in an effort to reduce the flood of new graduates into the already super-saturated market. If that does happen soon, it will put all of these new "pop-up" OD programs at risk. Don't assume that because a program is enrolling students that all will go smoothly with accreditation; sometimes it doesn't and students are left with their pants down. When it does happen, schools are usually ordered to repay tuition, but wasted time is not returnable. I'm not saying the school won't eventually be awarded a good status, but don't assume it, it's not a given.
You guys need to keep in mind that these new OD programs are in existence for one reason and one reason only; to make a profit from your tuition dollars. They are not starting up for the purpose of adding to the profession or bettering it in any way. The absolute last thing optometry needs right now is another OD program so you have to ask yourselves, "Why is this program here?" Treat the school as if it's selling you something and ask yourself whether the product they are selling to you, the customer, is worth the asking price.
Also, keep in mind that, as other ODs have pointed out, graduating from one of these new unnecessary schools will not likely put you in the prime running for one of the rare private practice associateships after graduation. A lot of private practice ODs are very upset with these new programs and what they're doing to an already struggling profession. There is some animosity, well deserved, directed at these new programs. Unfortunately, it's the graduates of the new schools who will shoulder the burden of that animosity, not the schools themselves.
If I were hell-bent on entering optometry in its current state, I'd be looking at ways to spend as little as possible on my degree to minimize my debt load after graduation. It can be daunting, especially when combined with declining income for ODs. Paying for one of these private schools will likely cost you over 200K in loans which will translate to almost twice that amount once repaid with interest. You'll be starting out at between 70K and 80K IF you're lucky enough to find a FT job. There's no practical difference between a $100K OD and a $200K OD, just the amount you pay for it and the difficulty in doing so.
I think that is the only thing I've ever read by Jason I don't completely hate. Good job. =}
......I have decided against applying to any of the schools that are in the 'pre-accreditation' status for the very reason you stated.
Be careful what you say you hate - it's going to be your reality very soon. You can tell yourself that you're going to be different, you'll work harder, you'll be smarter, you'll somehow plan ahead and avoid what the masses will not. You'll somehow get out of optometry school with 1K in student loans while everyone else borrows 180K. You're all heading down the same path, a career with lower pay, lower quality of work, longer hours, and more weekend work, all in the exciting world of commercial optometry. You just don't know it yet. Did you hate hearing that? It's the truth.
I think this is a wise choice, no matter what profession we're talking about. Applying to a non-accredited school for any degree is asking for trouble. The only people who should be considering these schools are ones who have extremely poor grades and/or test scores and can't get into a reputable school.
Is there ANY positive side to a career in optometry because you seem to not have anything but negative things to say? Every OD I've shadowed did nothing but encourage me to pursue this as my career choice. I've honestly wanted to be an optometrist since I was seven and everything I've worked for has been to achieve that goal. There's nothing else I could see myself doing, so I think it's a little too late to jump ship now and scramble to find a new career. I want to go to RSO because it's really close to my home and my family and they made me feel like more than a number, which is a lot more than I can say for the vast majority of the other schools I've been in contact with. You seem to be spending a great deal of time in the pre-optometry forum trying to convince anyone and everyone that optometry is not the way to go so why are other OD's so supportive of the profession?
ALL schools were once not accredited, even the most prestigious let's not forget that.
hi, could the people who received interviews at RSO-San Antonio list their stats, thanks!
Thanks, Jason, for this insight. As an applicant for the Fall of 2012 entering class, I have decided against applying to any of the schools that are in the 'pre-accreditation' status for the very reason you stated. I want to guarantee that my efforts will be rewarded with an accepted degree not only legally but amongst those already in the field. I used to work in retail as an optician, and those optometrists already working have been established for years, decades even and they have a very weighted say in who the company hires. The fact of the matter is whether it is fair or not doesn't seem to reflect in the decisions that are actually being implemented.
Blazen dont be afraid of a "Pre Accreditation" Label on a school, I am a class of 2014 student @ RSO and that kind of stuff never crosses our minds because its just a formality, these new schools have way too much money invested not to get accredited.
I think the school is great. The Profs are really nice and friendly especilly after you get past your 1st semester.
Jason from Chicago has been talking a lot of negativity, maybe our school didn't want him at one point or another.
Blazen dont be afraid of a "Pre Accreditation" Label on a school, I am a class of 2014 student @ RSO and that kind of stuff never crosses our minds because its just a formality, these new schools have way too much money invested not to get accredited.
I think the school is great. The Profs are really nice and friendly especilly after you get past your 1st semester.
Jason from Chicago has been talking a lot of negativity, maybe our school didn't want him at one point or another.
Jason from Chicago has been talking a lot of negativity, maybe our school didn't want him at one point or another.
Come for a site Visit Jason, I hope you are still around in 2 months after our 3rd years take their NBE's. Our curriculum is based on the top 5 programs in the country.
But you are correct, with the new programs starting up with all the latest technology, including the latest on diagnostics & treatments (like gene therapy), things that they never dreamed of when older ODs were in school I would be nervous if I was a dinasour in an exponentially advancing profession. Yea you have your CE classes but that's where u go in order to keep your license.
I do agree however that we should keep it at 20 schools, we don't want to over saturate the field like all the Law programs did. Although statistics show that older OD's are retiring at a healthy rate where we dont have to worry.
And I figured you were from Chicago because I was going to come visit your office and see it for myself.
Your post demonstrates an extreme disconnect with the real world.Come for a site Visit Jason, I hope you are still around in 2 months after our 3rd years take their NBE's. Our curriculum is based on the top 5 programs in the country.
But you are correct, with the new programs starting up with all the latest technology, including the latest on diagnostics & treatments (like gene therapy), things that they never dreamed of when older ODs were in school I would be nervous if I was a dinasour in an exponentially advancing profession. Yea you have your CE classes but that's where u go in order to keep your license. I do agree however that we should keep it at 20 schools, we don't want to over saturate the field like all the Law programs did. Although statistics show that older OD's are retiring at a healthy rate where we dont have to worry.
And I figured you were from Chicago because I was going to come visit your office and see it for myself.
Im flattered by all of your concern regarding job security for new grads once out of school. I personally have a private practice (not Americas Bestest, Peral, or Walmart) that I will be working for once Im done.
I just dont understand all the animosity & negativity, are all on you that scared for your future job security? So the plan is lets go onto "student" forums and try to bash as much as possible maybe turning one or two people away from that profession.
Guess what? It doesn't work fellas, so get out there refract, refract, refract, because that's your bread and butter.
Thank You & I approve this message
Correction 3rd year student, and this school does not hide the fact that its for-profit, after all this is a business, one would be dumb not to think it is.
Most of the Docs here preach against commercial optometry so I dont know where you get that from.
Furthermore, the clinical strength of any program lies mostly in the quality of its externship sites. Most students will agree that they "learned to be a doctor" at off-site rotations, not at the school's clinic. This has nothing to do with the technology or facility, but more to do with the fact that school clinics are not run like private offices, hospitals, or other real-world settings. They're run like schools. It takes a long time to develop quality over quantity in externship programs. Sorry, but your external sites leave much to be desired.
I was wondering if anyone could share some insight into the externship sites given by Pacific University and University of Waterloo (Canada).
I'm pretty sure this Jason guy is just a troll. I''ve seen him ****ting on optometry and RSO in other threads as well.
I just received my acceptance for RSO yesterday so if you want any information on the interview I'd be more than happy to help. Class size is small, about 60 and the main clinic is onsite with an additional clinic being built in an area of need. The equipment is about is new as it gets and you name it, they had it. I was very impressed by how the administrative staff seemed to know every current student by name. I do not feel like I will be just a number there or get lost in the shuffle. All of the classes are in the same building with parking right on site. Vast amounts of housing options with in walking distance of campus. They seemed to genuinely care about us as individuals and our success as future optometrists regardless of whether we attended their school or not. As you can see, I am quite sold on RSO, I fell in love with it after my visit and I felt like it had a very conducive environment for success.