Was it a psychologist?
<br>
I know the topic is taboo and it is generally socially acceptable to say derogatory things about sex offenders. But I do find it odd that we can be selectively empathetic towards other populations of people that have caused harm.
<br>
If we lined up a pedophile, a murderer, an impaired physician, a therapist who has sex with their client, and a CEO of a car company that makes safety recall decisions based on statistical likelihood of a lawsuit, I wouldn't be surprised if most people still thought the pedophile was worse than the others.
They all get little empathy but sure, pedophilia stands apart. I don't know why but let me brainstorm. Well, first you got a story of older man sexually abusing/raping some younger boys. So you have the standard abuse relationship stuff there (helplessness, power difference, inability to emotionally process the trauma, lack of protection, deep shame, breach of trust, unexpectedness of it, etc). That in itself is enough to make this thing felt more at the gut level than a system or business or businessman valuing bottom line above that of safety and well being of the customers. That is not too personal nor is it too surprising to see this kind of thing in business or politics. It's awful, it's ugly, but not as unexpected as a coach at one time associated with respectable and presumably trustworthy college like Penn State raping children over period of many years. <br><br>
But there is more. Human potential movement usually plays a role in how I value things. I suspect for many others too. An older person getting abused is awful. But a younger person getting abused is not only an awful event, it can totally change the direction of their lives, their identity development, pretty much everything, for worse. That is why, similarly, killing a young person is worse, from that perspective, than killing an old person.
In addition, there is the issue of suffering, at the time and as the victims process all this and as they grow older. The trauma and especially the shame can cause intense suffering for years to come. Come to think of it, another issue here is that it was an older man, almost a father type figure who raped these kids. Perhaps it would have been "more excusable" if a young person had done it? Though this is not related to the abuse itself, and more about society's biases, I think that it was a same sex abuse may also make some people uncomfortable in terms of trying to process this, though personally I don't think I would feel differently if he had raped girls as opposed to boys.
<br><br>
Lastly, it's the fact that this abuse was sexual in nature; sex is taboo, it's very personal and private, invasive, it's special, sacred, involves so many strong emotions, is so central to our identity and development, and has many sociocultural, spiritual, and religious implications. <br><br>
Sorry for rambling on and on, it's very late but I wanted to share some speculations with you.