- Joined
- Aug 19, 2003
- Messages
- 7,745
- Reaction score
- 55
Hey guys!
I was going through some old posts today?s and decided to click on a fellow SDN members signature that was linked to his personal blog site. I have to admit, I was appalled with what I saw. We are compared to "Nazi's" in the way that we practice pharmacy. The funny part is that I had a profound respect for this person's posts cause I've always have found them interesting; good, bad, or indifferent.
For some reason, from what I get from this person's post is that pharmacist's want to take complete control over prescribing. This is just utterly wrong. The pharmacy profession is trying to create a better healthcare team by having pharmacists participate more in the selection of therapeutic agents. In no way, shape, or form are we trained to diagnosis a patient. It was noted in another post that this person has seen a patient that had shingles, get treated for poison ivy with hydrocortisone cream by a pharmacist. Well, a pharmacist is the most open health professional there is in the health care industry. You are right in the fact we do not have years of dermatology experience. Most pharmacists will not physically handle a patient either; more like just eyeball the problem for this instance. If it itches, go ahead and recommend an anti-itch cream. If it doesn't go away in a few days, go see a doctor. What, may I ask, is the problem with that? Keep in mind; it usually takes a few days in order to see a physician. What does the patient do in the mean time?
In the last part of this person's initial rant, he compares pharmacists to untrained non-medical professionals. I just find this statement being said by this person hard to believe. How can you honestly say that about a *Pharmacist*?? Part of patient health care is to work well with a team. In the hierarchy of things, the attending physician is always first. There is no doubt about it. Then comes everyone else from nurses to pharmacists. I am sorry if this person feels that the physician's main duty is to boss everyone around and let everyone else on the team play "Stooge".
Normally, stupid BS like this person's post wouldn't bother me cause usually people that talk this way, don't really have a clue. It bothers me when a person that usually writes very good, well thought out posts goes and pisses on our profession. Oh well, C'est la Vie
http://nontradmedjournals.blog-city.com/read/897131.htm
I was going through some old posts today?s and decided to click on a fellow SDN members signature that was linked to his personal blog site. I have to admit, I was appalled with what I saw. We are compared to "Nazi's" in the way that we practice pharmacy. The funny part is that I had a profound respect for this person's posts cause I've always have found them interesting; good, bad, or indifferent.
For some reason, from what I get from this person's post is that pharmacist's want to take complete control over prescribing. This is just utterly wrong. The pharmacy profession is trying to create a better healthcare team by having pharmacists participate more in the selection of therapeutic agents. In no way, shape, or form are we trained to diagnosis a patient. It was noted in another post that this person has seen a patient that had shingles, get treated for poison ivy with hydrocortisone cream by a pharmacist. Well, a pharmacist is the most open health professional there is in the health care industry. You are right in the fact we do not have years of dermatology experience. Most pharmacists will not physically handle a patient either; more like just eyeball the problem for this instance. If it itches, go ahead and recommend an anti-itch cream. If it doesn't go away in a few days, go see a doctor. What, may I ask, is the problem with that? Keep in mind; it usually takes a few days in order to see a physician. What does the patient do in the mean time?
In the last part of this person's initial rant, he compares pharmacists to untrained non-medical professionals. I just find this statement being said by this person hard to believe. How can you honestly say that about a *Pharmacist*?? Part of patient health care is to work well with a team. In the hierarchy of things, the attending physician is always first. There is no doubt about it. Then comes everyone else from nurses to pharmacists. I am sorry if this person feels that the physician's main duty is to boss everyone around and let everyone else on the team play "Stooge".
Normally, stupid BS like this person's post wouldn't bother me cause usually people that talk this way, don't really have a clue. It bothers me when a person that usually writes very good, well thought out posts goes and pisses on our profession. Oh well, C'est la Vie
MattMessas said:Well, due to my confrontation with the nazi pharmacists on the pharmacy forum at SDN, I have successfully been banned for a period of 2 weeks there. I just could not sit by and listen as these pharmacists sat back and tried to influence people to believe that a pharmacist is capable of prescribing. There is so much more to prescribing than simply understanding the medicine. You simply have to be able to make a diagnosis, which these people are not taught to do. I get so sick of groups like psychologists banning together for script rights, and now pharmacists. Who will it be next, medical office managers, those that answer the phone in medical offices, or hell, how about we just create a state of "Pharmacy Marshall Law" where you can get whatever you want over the counter without a physician. I swear I would vote for this before I would allow untrained non-medical professionals to prescribe. Take a look at this thread for a bit of comic relief.
http://nontradmedjournals.blog-city.com/read/897131.htm