Please participate in the discussion. I value everyone's opinion. I truly do.
I have a hard time participating in discussions such as these because both sides are so charged. It's a passionate issue, and should be. I don't enjoy the mud slinging that comes from both sides though. I dunno, maybe I'm kind of a pacifist in that way.
As for the issue itself, I honestly consider myself to be in the center. I agree particularly with the point that was made of URMs going back to assist in URM Communities more than any other demographic. I feel like, being the average white male, I'm different in actually wanting to have that be part of my practice one day (gotta get into D-School first).
As for the argument. I think both sides will keep staying the same things over and over and few will have any real enlightenment occur as a result. The fact is, many URMs, ORMs, white people have socioeconomic disadvantages that make it difficult to make the grades and get the resources that help you succeed. Just someone's race or ethnicity should not give them an edge in admissions. The issue is not that cut and dry. I personally believe in rewarding hard work but unfortunately the only metric we have for that is GPA and DAT score. Which is sad because people should never be reduced to numbers, but in the way the current admissions system works, it must be so.
I disagree that being white automatically gives you a life made in the shade. Do I think there are still stereotypes for all races, yes, and unfortunately those are reinforced everyday by media and people's actions (i.e. you never hear about the black man who just saved a woman's life, you only hear about the one that tried to rape somebody. Meanwhile you hear loads about the white man who contributed to the red Cross and not as much about the one doing child prostitution).
I haven't lived a hard life, but nor was anything, especially college and education handed to me. I've gone into a lot of debt already because my parents won't/can't cover costs for me and will go into plenty more still. I've worked full time while going to school full time and pulled decent, but not great grades while doing so. I've gotten married and had a family while working and taking the occasional loan to cover costs. However, I don't ask for special consideration because of economic difficulties (yes difficulties) that I've had while going to school.
In the end I feel like the issue should be as others have stated, based off of socioeconomic status and not race/ethnicity. Then you would truly get a better sampling of all individuals who've struggled in the same way. I know that this method is not cut and dry either, but I feel like its a step in the better direction.
As for my opinion in general. I also hesitate to share it because we live in a country of scrutiny; no one can truly have an opinion anymore without being lambasted for stating it. An opinion is just that, an opinion. Gone are the days of "agreeing to disagree."
Hope this all made sense. If anything was unclear, happy to clarify.