- Joined
- Jul 6, 2006
- Messages
- 182
- Reaction score
- 0
I just wanted to correct a few things, and make a comment or two.All of these comparisons are made by using the most relative, ambiguous, and vague terms ever.
What defines a school as being the "best" or "worst" is not the same to every person on here.
Use more specific details to back up why a school may be better or worse than another.
I don't know if this matters at all, but I've worked with a pharmacist who recently graduated from Incarnate Word. She strongly disliked their program because their learning style is very didactic and powerpoint-based. There wasn't enough experiential training and it "wasn't a challenge" for her.
UT may be the "best" according to the rankings, but going to the school doesn't make you a better, more-prepared/qualified pharmacist than if you were to go somewhere like Tech, or U of H...
UT is a good school to go to if you want to go into research or teaching. Most of the students end up doing retail or hospital pharmacy anyway, but UT doesn't provide nearly as much experiential training as Tech or U of H does. Also, UTCOP is in the middle of an undergraduate campus. There are a few hospitals around here (I'm at UT for undergrad...), but they're not close to the pharmacy school so you don't get that connection with other health care professionals like you would with Texas Tech - this is one of the long list of reasons why I am choosing Tech over UT.
U of H has a lot to offer, especially since the P3s and P4s go to school in the largest medical center in the world... You just can't beat that kind of exposure to different avenues of health care professions.
Only drawbacks I can see with U of H is the traffic and the hot/humid weather 300 days out of the year.
Everyone knows about U of H, so it won't be that difficult to get a job in Texas if you go to U of H as opposed to any of the other schools in Texas.
A few reasons why I feel like the pharmacy program at Texas Tech is better than that of UT:
* The curriculum is adjusted and tweaked every year in order to give the students the best, most current education in pharmacy. At UT, they haven't changed their curriculum in years, with the exception of a few programs outside of the classroom that you're required to do (HOMES during the 1st year, and MTM certification in 3rd year) - big deal. MTM certification isn't difficult to get. HOMES is something Tech could easily do, anyway. Besides, (and correct me if I'm wrong) Tech requires the students to do rotations in elderly care; Tech is just as aware of the need for pharmacists in geriatric care as UT's program is.
* The faculty/staff is friendly and they actually care about the student's opinions
* Faculty is more accessible and approachable at Tech, according to general consensus of the student body.
* Tech's pharm school is a health science center, and P1s and P2s are there starting from day one. UT, and U of H? You're on an undergrad campus for your first two years of pharm school. Lame! I don't care what anyone says; having a pharmacy school in the middle of an undergrad campus instead of a health science center is a stupid concept. I understand that money plays a role in this, but with health practice going in the direction that it is, there is no reason for pharmacy to be separated from the other avenues of health care professions, even at the P1 and P2 level.
* More experiential/hands-on training.
* Employers are starting to take a liking to hiring Tech graduates because the past few years have shown that the students are coming out of school more prepared to do any job that is given to us, while most other programs tailor the students for specific jobs in pharmacy.
* Tech's learning facilities are newer, better, and have the most current technology (simulation lab, classrooms, etc.)
* IV preparation - pretty sure no other school in Texas has required their students to take a class in this. IV prep is a huge deal, yet none of the schools have done anything to address this as thoroughly as Tech has.
There are so many more things I love about Tech (Amarillo), but those are the main ones. I see Tech becoming one of the nation's best pharmacy programs in the next decade to be sure, but for now, they're extremely underrated.
So there's that.
Hope I didn't offend anyone with what I wrote. It just got a little frustrating seeing all the chatter about schools with no supporting arguments for the opinions.
Feel free to correct me if I am totally wrong about something I said; these are just my opinions and I can only speak for myself and no one else on here.
Firstly, UT did just overhaul their entire curriculum 2 years ago, and with UT Austin building a new medical school on campus, the incoming class of 2017 is going to be training alongside first year medical students starting in their P3 year, in an effort to try and encourage interdisciplinary cooperation and collaboration starting in professional school.
Secondly UT does have a lecture class on IV admixtures and a lab following it. (Current curriculum lists these classes as being in fall of P3 year)
And also, you're only considered an UG student for financial aid purposes in your first two years and only if you have not completed a BS prior to entry. UT has a very large campus and the Pharmacy buildings are very centrally located. But McComb's School of business (Another graduate program, ranked #1 in the nation at that) is also in the main campus, as is the Cockrell School of engineering, and soon to be the aforementioned Medical School. I don't really see why putting a Pharmacy school in the 40 acre main campus is a bad thing. If anything it allows the university to make available more assets and benefits that come with having a large main campus. Like multiple libraries, eateries, gyms, activity centers, etc. Plus, UT PharmD students give immunizations to the UT athletes. Can't do that as easily if your campus is a 2 hour drive from your main campus.
And yeah, UT's Pharmacy buildings are old, very old. But the classrooms are all state of the art, remodeled and outfitted with every bell and whistle out there (Doc cams, projectors, HD TVs flanking the aisles, etc)