The topic from which the discussion arises (inappropriate use and abuse of Evidence Based Medicine in a command/control economy) is interesting, but the discussion of the nature of the health care system as a whole in this nation is more interesting perhaps.
What is our health care system then? Not socialist, (although partly it is). Certainly NOT free market (there is essentially no free market in medicine). Certainly NOT capitalist. Certainly NOT communist (we still have some property rights).
I fear there is confusion between Hitlerism and fascism being presented here. I am quite confident I know my terms and how I use them. And I am also confident that fascism as "hyper capitalist" is fallacious (I don't even know what "hypercapitalist" means--you mean like "hyper free"??) I have little doubt that the US educational system has no problem confusing the terminology to keep Americans all messed up in our thinking. There are so many wonderful definitions out there used against us. Our world is filled with Newspeak, and the Ministry of Truth is active. "Liberal" and "conservative" for example keep utterly reversing themselves, so that now (at least in an economic framework) "liberal" means the opposite of what Liberal really meant (it use to mean freedom, and now means control) . And the "Conservatives" (a word meaning 'slow to change') now want radical change.
One definition of fascism is "a government that thinks it has the authority to do anything that it decides needs to be done, without limitation by any law, nor paying any heed to the rights of individuals". It is not worth a battle over the various changing definitions of the words we use, because those definitions flip around all over the place. Our poor children are STILL taught in school that fascism and socialism are opposite sides of the political spectrum, when indeed they are actually very similar ("national socialism" was Hitlerism after all) with both being very much on the opposite side of the spectrum from "free-market capitalism". That's why Stalin and Hitler were the center of World War 2--they were the two bullies on the block, alike in most all ways, duking it out in their sociopathic maelstrom. Two command/control narcissistic sociopaths with nearly identical evil ideology were going to attack each other sooner or later.
How about another term for our medical system: "Crony-collectivism." Can you accept that one? That term is pretty accurate, and more appropriate than "crony-capitalism" (which is an internally contradictory phrase, as cronyism and capitalism are opposites. "Crony-corporatism" is a valid term for our medical system as well, except that so many people think "corporatism" means "Corporations", when actually is means "bodies or groups" and thus applies not only to formal corporations, but unions, associations (collectives), and other organizations.
None of the terms for our medical system are pleasant positive terms, like "free market", caring, patient centered, abundant, easy, etc....