- Joined
- Feb 26, 2003
- Messages
- 8,860
- Reaction score
- 3,420
That is exactly right. You are spending your youth studying and working your butt off but at the end of the day, you still have nothing. You just have a ball of student loan debt.
That is exactly right. You are spending your youth studying and working your butt off but at the end of the day, you still have nothing. You just have a ball of student loan debt.
Did we discuss whether it's worth doing 10 years of study for a clinical position? How much do those jobs make anyway? In my opinion, if you're studious enough to do 10 years, you may as well go the MD route.In 2017:
(1) 2 years of residency for a "clinical" position
(2) 1 year of residency for a hospital position
(3) > 33% of the new graduates will be unemployed or underemployed
I will bump this thread up in 2017 to see if I am right.
Anyways, back on track. I don't see any way in which the over-saturation in the US Pharmacist market can't balance itself. Society has a way of self regulating due to circumstances. It's just a phase.
Well, I have to agree with you there. The education racket in the state is dispicable. Most higher education in Latin America and Europe is relatively cheap. In Germany they don't even pay tuition; what a novel idea. Here in Costa Rica Pharmacy school (Bsc Pharm 5 yr) is around $2250 a semester for a citizen; $5500 a semester for a foreigner. At 10 semesters it comes to a whopping $22,500 for a citizen and $55,000 for a foreigner. I fit into the latter category even though I'll have citizenship in two years. In order to use my GI Bill I have to attend as a foreigner.
Kind of sickening isn't it? The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Americans are slaves to debt.
-------
Anyways, back on track. I don't see any way in which the over-saturation in the US Pharmacist market can't balance itself. Society has a way of self regulating due to circumstances. It's just a phase.
The part I find ridiculous is the rest of the world requiring a Bsc Pharm and the US forcing every student into a Clinical degree that they don't necessarily need. I.E. taking more tuition from your pocket for no truly justifiable reason.
The only way for the market to rebalance itself is for pharmacy schools to be held accountable for the students they produce. Right now the schools get paid regardless if the graduating class is 100% employed or just 50% employed. It doesn't matter. It's just about tuition money. As long as there's money, pharmacy schools will continue to expand and new schools will open.
Even in this saturated job market, pharmacy schools are still expanding and more schools are planning to open. Just in California, four more schoools are planning to open. Not too long ago, there were just 4 schools. Now there are 8 schools and with these four schools, there will be 12 pharmacy schools in California.
That is scary! I was considering pharmacy, but these very reasons steered me away from pharmacy and made me consider medicine...Heh...33% unemployment? Even construction worker unemployment only hit 16%. I don't know of any validated methods to ascertain underemployment, though.
My prediction: eventually no more "hospital/dispensing" pharmacists, all tech check tech and decentralized clinical pharmacists + 1 centralized rph to handle high risk compounding.
Or robots...lots of robots.
Maybe not 2017 though.
That just confounds me. If they are truly producing pi$$ poor students, how are they passing the NAPLAX? Now, if they are producing halfway decent academics who can do their job; at the very least they can transition into research positions with a little more school.
There is a somewhat different system here in Costa Rica. They will generally admit anyone who can pass a psychometric test, or has previously graduated from college, but they REFUSE to dumb down the curriculum. Very few people who start will graduate from a program. I know that in my wife's initial classes for her 5 year bachelors in the teaching of English as a second language (very freaking difficult degree for someone who's native language is not English) there were hundreds of students. In the end about 8 graduated. Of those, maybe four moved on to the Licenciatura (a 1 year graduate degree that confers the right to teach in a government school or university setting.)
Has the American University system really diluted down to just a cash cow business? It disheartens me. Makes me want to do graduate work in Europe.
Alternatively, the market could balance by wages lowering and people leaving the profession.
That is scary! I was considering pharmacy, but these very reasons steered me away from pharmacy and made me consider medicine...
Working at a high volume retail store for $80,000/yr with $1500/month debt payments for 20 years sounds like hell. I can imagine the service levels in that scenario.
Psych or FM for me... I ain't going to spend that crazy amount of money to have problem finding work...Just stay away from radiology . . . Supposedly those residents are desperate for work.
@oldstock Here is what we can do to make changes in our field. Pharmacists in WA (where I'm from) are already providers. But under federal law, pharmacists are not recognized as providers.
Ive seen on multiple threads how you have been searching for a way to make changes in our field. Here it is buddy. Spread the word.
http://copy-apha-pharmacists.kickoffpages.com/?kid=4HWFS