Time to clear some thing's up again since we're getting a little SDN crazy again in here.
1) While there is some truth in that there are specialty programs that exist that don't look at P/F schools, the reality is dental education is trending towards P/F. The whole reason this thing is getting any publicity currently is because, with the exception of OMFS, specialty programs have yet to figure out a way to measure students or if they should institute a separate test since both boards and dental grading is trending towards P/F. This obviously affects Roseman being a P/F school. That said, your source in "administration" saying that nearly all of the inaugural classes residency acceptances are AEGD/GPRs is false. We have at least one student going into every recognized dental specialty with the exception of pathology cause no one applied. Of the 24 that applied to residencies, maybe half are doing an AEGD/GPR. That said, by all means, if you someone know as a predental you want to specialize (lulz), than it is prudent to attend a school with high specialization rates like Harvard of Penn. All the power to you. But you shouldn't be introducing false or erroneous information since "facts" on SDN are never taken with a grain of salt.
2) The idea that a school is "not reputable" or "risky" is a silly notion. Every school was new at some point. Looking at the crop of new dental schools, would you think less of Nova, ASDOH, UNLV, Western, or Midwestern? This idea of not being reputable or risky flies out the window once a school graduates their first class or two. Combine that with our fantastic board pass rates, and you should be comfortable as an applicant.
2.5) Another common point brought up by predents is clinical reputation or number of pts etc. In reality, even if you attended a dental school that did twice as much patient care than whoever is the current best clinical school, the reality is you will do more in your first month of practice than four years of dental school. You should be focused on acquiring the skills to be able to learn dentistry throughout your career. That's why it's called practicing dentistry. Rare is the student that graduates from d school with all the skills in his arsenal to just kick ass in private practice.
3) Applying to dental school is tricky. The prevailing SDN wisdom is go to the cheapest school. If that's what you buy into, than all the power to you. But everyone has different priorities e.g. cost, prestige of the school, location, work load, quality of life, future career paths, etc. Everyone should absolutely apply broadly and pick the best choice for them. That may inconvenience those of you on a waitlist, but oh well.
4) The idea that Roseman is easier than ugrad is a funny one as well. Just because students have ample free time doesn't mean a school is easy. How many medical schools out there are done with class by 12. Students have the time to do with as they pleasure. Does it mean they are easy? Of course not. What you see at Roseman is a byproduct of an attempt at instituting a new pedagogy that is more efficient and competent than the traditional model. If you would rather be miserable for four years or attend a dental school like NYU that banks on attrition and dropping dental students before clinic, than have at it champ.
5) The idea that there is such a thing as a "safety school" in dental application is also laughable. The ultimate truth with dental admissions is schools are seeking the best applicants that will fit best with their program. If you want to do research, go to Harvard. You'll be miserable at a clinically oriented school like UoP. Or vice versa.
Again, sorry for the high horse / soap box / wall of text. You guys are in a tough position with the waiting game and that can lead to a bit of "cabin fever" so to speak. Do your best to stay off SDN, improve your applications for the next cycle, live life, pick up a hobby, or anything that will distract you from jumping on SDN and reading / writing some crazyyyy stuff.