Trauma Surgery:Discipline in Crisis

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
D

deleted65604

One of the most interesting articles I have ever read from this month's issue of Annals of Emergency Medicine- Volume 53 Number 2 February 2009.

http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0196-0644(08)00615-X

Some quotes off of MDconsult link:

As articulated by a recent president of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma: "The specialty of trauma surgery is in trouble!"1 Potent economic, logistic, political, and workforce challenges increasingly confront this discipline. Trauma surgeons have characterized their field as "in the throes of an identity crisis that threatens its future"2,3 and that the status quo is "untenable."4 They have stated that "the discipline must change to remain viable and attractive to future candidates."5 Trauma surgeons are "clearly an endangered species,"6 "gasping for air,"7 and "in danger of becoming extinct."3,7,8 One contends that "the contemporary model of trauma care where dedicated trauma/critical care surgeons exclusively manage trauma patients has become progressively unsustainable."9

The life of a trauma surgeon was regarded as glamorous because its practitioners regularly whisked injured victims to the operating room to explore abdomens and remove spleens within the so-called golden hour.11,12 This essential heroism captured the imagination of other physicians and of the general public and provided the political clout that led to profound and enduring political achievements.

The practice of trauma surgery has transitioned from the invigoration of frequent "emergency" laparotomies to fairly routine and increasingly protocol-driven ward management.1,16,17,19,21-23 In retrospect, many or most of those "lifesaving" laparotomies from the early days of trauma were unnecessary.

At my busy American College of Surgeons Level I trauma center, the incidence of such intervention is just 3.0% of adult trauma team activations and just 0.35% of pediatric activations,24 numbers comparable to those reported elsewhere.9,25,26 Most of these emergency surgeries are for penetrating trauma. If one considers blunt mechanisms separately, the frequencies decrease to 1.2% of adults and 0.09% of children. For blunt injury at my trauma center, emergency operative intervention by a trauma surgeon averages once every 7 weeks for adults and less than once every 3 years for children.24 Ciesla et al25 report that at their urban Level I trauma center, "a trauma surgeon must evaluate 10 trauma patients, admit 9, and provide up to 65 days worth of inpatient care for every one that needs an acute care operation."

During this same quarter century of profound change within trauma care, the specialty of general surgery has experienced a recruiting crisis. In 1981 general surgery was the first specialty choice for 12.1% of senior medical students; however, in ensuing years it has eroded to less than half of this number (Figure).36-39 Approximately 70% of graduating surgical residents now go on to subspecialties rather than remain
in general surgery.40 The proportion of general surgeons as a fraction of the total physician workforce has decreased by half during the past 30 years (8% to 4%), and Fischer40 has predicted "the impending disappearance of the general surgeon." The reasons for this decline are clear. Graduating medical students increasingly balk at the total dedication of personal life traditionally deemed essential for general surgeons.13,19,38,41 The sacrifices have been likened to being called into the priesthood or a nunnery.42 Dissatisfaction prompts one fourth of surgery residents to resign and move on to other specialties.42 As one surgery resident recalled his training: "_ there must be some alternative to a system that chews up individuals and crushes families with such ruthless efficiency."43

Given this decrease in popularity, surgical residencies cannot be as selective as they once were. Surgeons worry about the quality of their new trainees.7,19,38,39,44-46 At one medical school, the majority of students pursuing careers in general surgery scored below the mean on standardized medical licensure examinations.44 Residencies are receiving fewer applicants from the top 10% of medical school classes and are going deeper into their rank lists to fill.45

The allure of trauma surgery has been particularly hard hit during this downturn in the popularity of general surgery.2,10 Given its rarity of operative intervention, residents and medical students often view trauma surgery rotations as a "baby-sitting service,"19 ie, watching patients while orthopedists, neurosurgeons, and other subspecialists perform nonemergency evaluations and interventions.1,2,10,17,19,21-23 Ciesla et al25 refer
to trauma surgeons as having become "house staff for the surgical subspecialist."


As a new attending, I have experienced a lot of the above first hand. I have never had a general surgeon at the bedside during a trauma in 9 months. If they are sick enough to need a surgeon, it has always been a subspecialty that the trauma surgeon consults when I send the patient to them.

Some new general surgery grads are a little scary as well.

A lot of med students on this forum that are attracted to the previously glorious field of trauma surgery should read this article.

Members don't see this ad.
 
I was a general surgery resident and I went into plastics after completing general surgery. I'm in the doctors lounge about to do surgery right now. Not 2 minutes ago a hospital administrator walked in and asked me if I would please do general surgery. Of course my reply was no. These requests come frequently. Trauma 'surgery' sucks. The 'Trauma Center' designation is just a way for hospitals to make money. If you are the trauma surgeon you give up your life to make someone else money. Where is the 1.3 million a year CEO at 3 in the morning when you are in the trauma bay doing an exam and admitting the patient for baby sitting?

Food for thought anyway.
 
Jarabacoa, thanks for posting that. I begin a Gen Surg residency hellbent on becoming a Trauma Surgeon. And while I mean no disrespect to the specialty that I loved for so long (while on the outside), I can tell ya that I'm now about to start an EM residency for many of the reasons cited in the article. Striking a balance in one's life is essential to most rational people. For some reason, that's an unacceptable "sign of weakness" within the world of Surgery, which I think is nothing short of rediculous and shameful.

I was also disenchanted by the amount of babysitting being done. Why does Ortho get to write "Afebrile, VSS, will take to OR when sugars ok" and I have to act like the Critical Care Medicine doc for this Ortho patient, simply b/c they came in as a trauma? They take him back, fix the fracture, then dump him back on me. That's no fun. It's bad enough there was no intervention from Trauma's standpoint, but now I have to manage your patient for you? No thank you.

Then to add injury to insult, the whole new paridigm of the "Acute Care Surgeon" is a sugarcoated way of saying "the hospital garbageman" IMO. Your job essentially becomes taking any and all unscheduled emergencies in the hospital to the OR, in addition to attending to your huge trauma babysitting list. And the vast majority of these cases (from my experience) are Gen Surg (colorectal) cases that the primary team doesn't feel like doing (butt abscess surgery, or 3 AM surgery), or small stuff they don't wanna get bogged down with (trach & peg). And for what? Sacricing everything you are and you want to do/become? Definitely no thank you.

Somewhere within the world of Surgery, someone's gotta wake up and say hey, it's no surprise we don't have a ton of people flocking toward Gen Surg. It's cuz they run it like the military, and most of us don't exactly wanna sign up for something like that. Gen Surg needs to evolve quickly, or who knows what the crisis will lead to.
 
Top