- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Messages
- 610
- Reaction score
- 4
Anyone else think this whole UNDr process was a mess? Only a small portion of postdoc sites participated. Some APPIC sites participated, some didn't. Some non-APPIC postdoc sites participated, many didn't. One site originally told me they were following the UNDr policies, but then just changed their mind in March.
I personally did "place", if I can use that word, at a very strong site on Wednesday. However, there were 2 other sites I liked about as well as the position I accepted (and had a better location for me) at leading medical colleges that are still in the process of making decisions.
I sort of just think APPIC should use use a uniform date for all sites, perhaps in a format similar to the match (in some manners). Streamline the APPIC approval for postdoc sites, and bring in as many sites/placements as possible.
Anyone else have any problems-thoughts-dislikes/likes with the UNDr this year?
I personally did "place", if I can use that word, at a very strong site on Wednesday. However, there were 2 other sites I liked about as well as the position I accepted (and had a better location for me) at leading medical colleges that are still in the process of making decisions.
I sort of just think APPIC should use use a uniform date for all sites, perhaps in a format similar to the match (in some manners). Streamline the APPIC approval for postdoc sites, and bring in as many sites/placements as possible.
Anyone else have any problems-thoughts-dislikes/likes with the UNDr this year?