It seems like many students in PhD programs want to eventually work at a VA. I am just curious to see what you think the appeal is? Aren't you paid the same at general hospitals?
I get to work at 8 (ok sometimes 10 after) and I leave at 430! I do not take any work home. Where else does this happen?!
Alt-ac, if you play your cards right.Not at an R1.
I definitely like the VA, but it has its positives and negatives. I have applied for a few VA postions, but being outside the VA currently has shown me a few negatives as well. Broadly, the VA runs on very different rules than the rest of healthcare. This can be a great thing in some ways. However, it also can limit opportunities outside of the VA if you ever have to leave. For example, try getting into an administrative position outside the VA without knowing the ins and outs of billing insurance.
... a bizarro world where the rules of the "real world" don't really apply.
I don't know, I've seen many people seamlessly transition out to AMC's and the like. I don't see this as that big of a barrier.
You can moonlight. I know some people who do some IME and forensic chart review on the side. I know of no "exclusivity" clause in the VA. As long as you are not guilty of dereliction of duty, what you do during your off-duty hours is your business. Just don't violate the Hatch Act.Heeeeyyy...we're talking about the Federal Government here. What you trying to say? (JK, of course.)
If you work in the VA system (say paid, full-time position), could you possibly "moonlight"
yep. I do utilization review on the side. I learn billing that way.
When I was training at a VA, there were numerous psychologists and psychiatrists who had part-time private practices on the side.
I don't know, I've seen many people seamlessly transition out to AMC's and the like. I don't see this as that big of a barrier.
I don't think it would hinder you from a n academic or fully clinical service position, but I can't imagine it would bode well for administrave or mixed clinical and admin positions where billing, utilization reviews, and the business aspects of psychology come into play. At least I have not seen it in the later career psychologists that have made or up the ladder. There is always going to be a premium for certain business skills, IMO.
I would disagree, with the caveat that the VA, within the past 2-3 years, has become extremely concerned with service utilization, "productivity", outcome/performance measurments, and general penetration of services. Its a slow process that has reached my VA, but I am sure not all VAs. My chief seems well versed in organizational development, clincial oversight and supervision, as well as general administration. This is my experience anyway.
I agree with erg, I think the VA deals with a lot more of that stuff than you think. Also, in many VA's (at least the ones I've worked in), psychologists are department heads and hold many high level admin posts.
It may be for some, but I personally haven't seen it. In general, several mentors that I've known have left to become division heads or directors of npsych services at AMC's. Others leave for the forensic world.You may be right, I am far from an expert on these matters. All I know is that for my niche area I see some differences. My work in certain areas was more highly valued on the private market than at the VA (vent pts) and most of the clinical directors I see at my job have more to do on the side of facility issues, medicare regs, billing, etc. I am just worried that taking a VA position in the future may hinder my ability to obtain an administrative position on the private market without a lot familiarity in these areas.
I am at a va/r1 academic medical center. I like this environment. My work week is diverse. I do research, program development, work with students on research and clinical training, and clinical work. The va system isn't really setup for my type of position. So, there a bit more administrative hurdles that have to be traversed than in a typical say, clinical position. I have responsibilities across both institutions and they have slightly different goals and metrics and I am independently evaluated by both sides. I think I am currently an active member of 5 departments spanning both institutions. Which, of course means I am not a fully functioning member of any department. This situation sort of grew organically. There are some advantages. I have a wide network. I am involved in a large number of projects and the research is quite interesting. Disadvantages include too many meetings, a lot of time demands, and have to shift thinking sets frequently. It will be interesting to see how long I can maintain this.
I am interested in observations on how the VA handles pregnancy, maternity/paternity leave, and other issues related to parenting. Do they offer part-time positions once a career is established?
I was recruited by the AMC by people that were dual appointed. Initially funding was mostly through a VA grant and things have evolved from there. I started as a research assistant prof and transitioned to tenure track w bigger grants.
The VA where I will intern is affiliated with an AMC. When I worked at this VA prior to graduate school, I was hired by the AMC but remained at the VA until the grant ended and the clinical research was transferred to the AMC.Yeah, I would figure if nothing else, HR at an AMC is infinitely easier to deal with than HR at a VA, even if the VA's the one paying most of the salary.
I am interested in observations on how the VA handles pregnancy, maternity/paternity leave, and other issues related to parenting. Do they offer part-time positions once a career is established?
Do you really work in Appalachia?I agree that the VA can be flexible, but there is no paid maternity/paternity leave specifically. You can accumulate sick time to cover it, so once you are at the VA for awhile (and if you can plan ahead for it, and if you don't need sick leave for anything else), you are fine. You can also ask for donated leave from others. But if you are recently hired (or if your position switches from the affiliated AMC due to funding, which is what I saw happen with coworkers when I was at a VA), good luck...
Not at a VA anymore, in grad school, but I am definitely in Appalachia...Do you really work in Appalachia?
This issue isn't so cut and dry. It depends on how many people are going to the conference. If it's over a certain number, they won't fund it. I'm not sure what the number is, but I was told there was a list of big conferences somewhere that they won't fund. There may also be a loophole if you are going somewhere for recruitment (i.e., INS for postdoc interviews.)As an aside, I hadn't been posting here for awhile (about a year) and I found this thread: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/just-wante
Germaine to the topic of "VA Appeal" - apparently the funded-conference gravy-train I've been enjoying at the VA for the past several years is now over. As another aside, I had spoken with a GS-15 who has supervisory responsibilities over my work area, and he said that ironically, the VA has "plenty of money" to cover funded travel to conferences, but politically, it's just something they can't do, at least currently. Austerity - or at least the appearance of it - is where it's at right now.
This issue isn't so cut and dry. It depends on how many people are going to the conference. If it's over a certain number, they won't fund it. I'm not sure what the number is, but I was told there was a list of big conferences somewhere that they won't fund. There may also be a loophole if you are going somewhere for recruitment (i.e., INS for postdoc interviews.)
Is it pretty doable to transfer to an AMC from a VA? I'm asking because my internship will be at a VA and I've been finding the idea of working at an AMC very appealing.
That's the way it was explained to me. I'll certainly make yet another formal push for full funding to attend APA in DC this year, but I'm less optimistic than ever.I could be wrong, but my understanding was that this was an issue specific to conferences in appealing vacation destinations - that it would look bad to congress for the government to be sending a bunch of employees to hang out in Hawaii...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think APA may be one on the "Do Not Fund" list. I heard there are just too many people system-wide who apply for funding for it. Doesn't bother me much because APA isn't a great place to network or do business, but it makes sense financially.That's the way it was explained to me. I'll certainly make yet another formal push for full funding to attend APA in DC this year, but I'm less optimistic than ever.
My brother lives about an hour from DC.I think APA may be one on the "Do Not Fund" list. I heard there are just too many people system-wide who apply for funding for it. Doesn't bother me much because APA isn't a great place to network or do business, but it makes sense financially.
My brother lives about 45 minutes from Detroit?
Yeah, not a huge deal for me personally. In the end, you have to find what works for you. Plus, all of the other perks make up for the downfalls for me. Although, if someone out there finds a job that has generous paid annual and sick leave, paid paternity/maternity leave, paid conference travel, a pension, excellent insurance benefits, matching retirement benefits, paid federal holidays, and protected research time, you let me know I'm happy with just most of those benefits if I can't get all of them.Didnt realize that the VA doesnt pay for conferences. I would think it more an annoyance than anything if I were a GS-13, given all the other perks, but as a fellow I'm certainly glad that my hospital is paying for the AACN conference in New York this year...holy crap is that hotel expensive even with the conference rate.