Weakest Derm Programs?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

wannaBderm

New Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hey all,
wondering if anyone can share their opinions of the "weakest" derm programs in the country...if there are such things as weak derm programs. And not that they are the same thing, but can anyone list a few programs that are considered more community-based?
I'm asking because I'm a fairly weak / non-traditional applicant and would be willing to go just about ANYwhere to get into this field. I'm trying to get a feel for programs that don't tend to be ranked highly by the most competitive applicants...
Thanks!

Members don't see this ad.
 
Considering the limited # of programs in general, I probably don't think there are any weak programs. Perhaps there are some that may be limited in the scope of skin they see (perhaps programs located in highly rural regions?) but I think even that's a stretch.
 
On the contrary, I think that there are unfortunately a lot of derm programs that aren't very strong, but despite this, are still able to have their pick of great applicants. There are some programs out there with limited faculty and no Mohs surgeons (I suppose residents would have to rotate for this experience). I'd consider those as weak programs.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
On the contrary, I think that there are unfortunately a lot of derm programs that aren't very strong, but despite this, are still able to have their pick of great applicants. There are some programs out there with limited faculty and no Mohs surgeons (I suppose residents would have to rotate for this experience). I'd consider those as weak programs.

Can programs be accredited without a MOHS surgeon on board? I interviewed at a few programs with limited faculty but everyone had a MOHS surgeon on board (along with a dermatopathologist, pediatric dermatologist, etc...)
 
yeah, they do exist... I interviewed at a couple of programs that didn't have a true "Mohs" surgeon... Also, I was under the impression that having a Pedi Derm on staff was not as common as programs would like being that there are so few of them out there.... so it would seem that neither would be a requirement (I guess as long as procedures are logged and pediatric patients are seen in clinic it is enough for certification?).
 
yeah, they do exist... I interviewed at a couple of programs that didn't have a true "Mohs" surgeon... Also, I was under the impression that having a Pedi Derm on staff was not as common as programs would like being that there are so few of them out there.... so it would seem that neither would be a requirement (I guess as long as procedures are logged and pediatric patients are seen in clinic it is enough for certification?).

My understanding is that something like 40% of programs do not have a full-time pedi dermatologist. From my experience interviewing that sure seems correct. I definitely saw a few places without a Mohs surgeon, and I saw other programs where the Mohs surgeons are so busy with the fellows that they have basically no interaction with residents. Places with Mohs surgeons but without Mohs fellows ended up being some of my favorites just because of all the experience.

As far as which programs are the weakest, I would say that generally the smaller programs tend to be weaker and the larger programs tend to be better. For someone looking to "just match" in derm, my advice is the same to my friends who want to go to a "top" program: apply everywhere and see what turns up. You will be surprised by where you get interviews and by what places ignore you.
 
For someone looking to "just match" in derm, my advice is the same to my friends who want to go to a "top" program: apply everywhere and see what turns up. You will be surprised by where you get interviews and by what places ignore you.

:thumbup: Strongly agree!
 
IMHO any program with 5+ residents/year, a dedicated pedi-derm, Mohs, and dermpath attending, is a GREAT clinical training program. You should hope for interviews at these programs. :thumbup:

If you're looking for research-oriented top tier programs ranked by NIH funding among other objective measures, read this article: http://dermatology.cdlib.org/133/original/academy/wu.html

Any program just running on volunteer faculty, 3 or fewer residents/year, and a history of funding problems...not so good.
 
Thanks guys, a few of those responses were super helpful. Off the top of your heads, anyone remember going to any interviews that made you think "wow, this program is hurting?" If so, would you mind sharing where you got that feeling (either b/c of funding probs, faculty shortage, etc)? I'd be curious to know.

Also - can someone explain to me what the deal is with the DO derm programs? So DO's are welcome to apply to allopathic derm residencies (though i'm sure match rate is probably ridiculously low), but MD's aren't able to do DO derm residencies? Or are we? I've never heard of an MD doing a DO derm residency, but am curious to know if those programs consider MD applicants.
 
IMHO any program with 5+ residents/year, a dedicated pedi-derm, Mohs, and dermpath attending, is a GREAT clinical training program. You should hope for interviews at these programs. :thumbup:

If you're looking for research-oriented top tier programs ranked by NIH funding among other objective measures, read this article: http://dermatology.cdlib.org/133/original/academy/wu.html

Any program just running on volunteer faculty, 3 or fewer residents/year, and a history of funding problems...not so good.

I'd agree with all that with the exception of the 3 or fewer residents/year programs. I certainly enjoy a larger class size myself but I was very pleasantly surprised by quite a few programs that took <3 residents/year. There was even a program that only took 1 resident/year that I ranked very highly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
3 or fewer residents/year...not so good.

Disagree completely.

I heard from several of the Mayo MN residents that the residents at the Mayo satellite programs know everything and come out completely prepared to handle any and every derm condition. While it is easy to fade into the background and not stretch yourself at bigger programs.

To me, it seems that in a small program, you would respond to more consults, make more presentations, do more procedures, and in general receive more breadth in training than in a 5+ program. This would make for outstanding clinical training.

I'm curious to know why you think it is only at programs that have 5+ residents per class one can receive top-notch clinical training? I can see having more research opportunities at a large program, but why so much better for clinical training?
 
Generally, bigger programs tend to have better funding and are more likely to have more dedicated faculty, and many more patients to see. I don't mean to insult smaller programs, so I apologize. I do agree that it would be easier to "shine" if you are one of two residents, for example.
 
Something to think about is whether or not a program is its own independent department or a division of the department of Medicine. I can see strengths in being independent. I am sure there are strengths being under the umbrella as well. Something to consider...

Regarding research opportunities, it is what you make of it. If you go after your own funding then who cares the size of the program. In fact, the smaller program will probably give you more breathing room to explore your own areas of research. This is one of the major reasons I went with my program in the end.

Also, the smaller program may be the one with the R01s. Ask and compare...
 
Members don't see this ad :)
IMHO any program with 5+ residents/year, a dedicated pedi-derm, Mohs, and dermpath attending, is a GREAT clinical training program. You should hope for interviews at these programs. :thumbup:

If you're looking for research-oriented top tier programs ranked by NIH funding among other objective measures, read this article: http://dermatology.cdlib.org/133/original/academy/wu.html

Any program just running on volunteer faculty, 3 or fewer residents/year, and a history of funding problems...not so good.

Thank you for sharing this article. There happens to be a smaller program (2-3) listed with over $500k of funding whereas a larger program (5) I ranked lower isn't even listed. To be fair, perhaps the larger program gets most of its money from NSF.
 
I agree that no generalization is perfect, but the 5+ programs tend to correlate with patient volume, which is one good predictor of clinical greatness. Then again there are 5+ programs who can't fill their clinics right now, so it all depends.

Overall I think programs where the residents are slightly annoyed at getting more work than they expected is probably optimal.

But back to the original question, these days even middling candidates should apply to every single program, so so should you. If you're trying to choose aways, I think the question should be (addressed elsewhere here) which places favor/take their away rotators, and how best to do an away.
 
Thank you for sharing this article. There happens to be a smaller program (2-3) listed with over $500k of funding whereas a larger program (5) I ranked lower isn't even listed. To be fair, perhaps the larger program gets most of its money from NSF.

Might be a division vs department thing. From the paper "Our study should be interpreted with a few caveats. We were not able to determine the total amount of NIH funding in dollars of the dermatology divisions."
 
Might be a division vs department thing. From the paper "Our study should be interpreted with a few caveats. We were not able to determine the total amount of NIH funding in dollars of the dermatology divisions."

Comparing divisions to departments is a major issue, but with that being said, conventional wisdom is that the only "strong" divisions are UCLA, Wash U, and Duke. I may be missing some. This issue came up on dermboard a few years ago:

http://dermatology.yuku.com/reply/2597/t/WOW-MCG-is-bad.html#reply-2597

Another issue is that this paper didn't do a peer assessment score, which I think matters a lot in small field like derm. It's great that they use objective measures, but there are also some issues with that -- their ranking system heavily favors programs with old school faculty who have been around the block. It's great to have some of these people at your program, but I think what's better is having a mix of old and new so that it's not a complete vacuum when a bunch of established faculty retire or depart at the same time.
 
Hey all,
wondering if anyone can share their opinions of the "weakest" derm programs in the country...if there are such things as weak derm programs. And not that they are the same thing, but can anyone list a few programs that are considered more community-based?
I'm asking because I'm a fairly weak / non-traditional applicant and would be willing to go just about ANYwhere to get into this field. I'm trying to get a feel for programs that don't tend to be ranked highly by the most competitive applicants...
Thanks!

I couldn't name any in particular but I'd say a weaker program might not have a full time mohs surgeon, dermatopathologist, peds derm, or IM/derm double boarded person on faculty. I think if a program had all of these on board they could train you in all aspects of derm. Just my 2 cents.
 
Since someone posted a ranking of top programs here is an article from Medical Economics that came out Jan 23, 2009

http://www.modernmedicine.com/moder...atology/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/576055

If you don't have acces I'll cut and past the whole article below:

Quality medical care can be found in every specialty and in every corner of the country, in hospitals and free clinics, in solo practices, and in sprawling medical centers. Sometimes, though, a clinical center, through a combination of talent, hard work, resources, funding, and leadership, rises above the pack in certain areas.

While some centers are known throughout the medical community for their overall expertise, we saw a need for a physician's guide to the best in various specialties.In response to this, Medical Economics is proud to launch the first of what will be a regular series: Clinical Centers of Excellence. The purpose is to recognize those hospitals that bring a little something extra to a specialty, whether through research, patient care, or community outreach.

We've chosen the centers based on information from key opinion leaders in various specialties and through physician surveys. To help choose the Clinical Centers of Excellence in Dermatology, we surveyed readers of Dermatology Times and spoke with dermatology KOLs. We then asked the centers to report data and other information, which was verified whenever possible.

Geography is a factor as well. Doctors are more likely to recommend&#8212;and patients are more likely to visit&#8212;a center that is nearby rather than one across the country.The institutions profiled in this issue&#8212;the Mayo Clinic, University of Michigan Health System, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, and University of California, San Francisco Medical Center&#8212;have dermatology programs that are among the finest in the country.

Though we could not profile them all, we have included a list of other Centers of Excellence identified by our surveys and key opinion leaders. We do not rank any of the centers relative to each other, but explain what makes them unique.

Clinical Centers of Excellence for Dermatology

Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts

The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California

Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York

New York University Medical Center, New York, New York

University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, Texas

University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Advanstar Clinical Centers of Excellence
Institutions under consideration to be named Clinical Centers of Excellence are asked to self-report data, which is checked against publicly available information. Depending on the specialty, these criteria may include:

Quality-improvement initiatives under way

Community outreach

National awards and recognition

Participation in national therapeutic initiatives (e.g., the National Cancer Consortium, Children's Oncology Group, etc.)

Number of referrals for the particular specialty area

Number of international referrals

Number of patients treated/procedures performed per year

Number of research protocols engaged in annually

Number of medication/surgical errors

Systems in place to prevent errors

Outcomes data (e.g., mortality/morbidity rates, unnecessary readmission rates, etc.)

Level of technological equipment on site

EHR processes and level of development

Participation in regional systems integration initiatives

Follow-up care programs (e.g., enforcement of secondary prevention/medication compliance)

Patient education efforts

Patient satisfaction survey results

Infectious disease prevention efforts

Availability of comprehensive care programs (e.g., preventive cardiology)

Evidence of incorporating research and clinical care

High ranking by NCQA

KOL publishing records

Medical Nobel Laureates on faculty

JCAHO certification/accreditation



Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota

A dedicated inpatient service, an outpatient service seeing 60,000 patients per year, the 13,000 procedures performed annually, and the more than 430,000 laboratory and dermatopathology tests addressed each year provides ample support for the clinical and population-based research the Mayo Clinic dermatology department is known for.

While most of the patients entering dermatology inpatient treatment are referred for serious or recalcitrant skin diseases, the overwhelming number of referrals are to the Mayo Clinic's dermatopathology laboratory, says Randall K. Roenigk, MD, chair, department of dermatology.

Of the more than 430,000 blood and tissue samples processed in 2008, 70 to 80 percent of those requiring immunohistologic processing were sent in from outside the Mayo Clinic area. "I would estimate that for routine pathology 70 to 80 percent of specimens are from the Rochester area and only 30 percent come from other institutions. But for immunopathology, the ratio is reversed," Roenigk says.

In fact, the immunopathology department has grown substantially during the past few years to accommodate the referrals. "We have a large volume of specimens that are sent in relating to gastrointestinal disease because we developed some of the tests for GI disorders that have skin implications," Roenigk explains. For example, the antigliadin antibody test for celiac disease, which has both GI and dermatologic manifestations, is commonly ordered by dermatologists and GI specialists.

Enhancing Primary Care
The large volume of dermatology outpatient visits combined with the 3,000 Moh's procedures and 10,000 non-biopsy procedures for other skin cancer treatments, wide-excisions, grafts, flaps, and wound repairs has prompted Mayo Clinic dermatologists to actively engage and educate primary care practices. This helps primary care physicians diagnose and treat the more common dermatologic conditions that account for 70 percent of cases such as warts, dermatitis, psoriasis, eczema, and skin cancer. "If we took care of all of these people in our department it would make it difficult for more complicated patients to access care," Roenigk says.

The dermatology department has therefore initiated a program for wart treatment where primary care patients have warts evaluated and treated by a dermatologic nurse. Follow-up care is through their primary care physicians.

Mayo Clinic dermatologists also help primary care practices with skin cancer diagnoses. "Primary care physicians are pretty good at identifying skin cancer," says Roenigk. "We can train them how to do a biopsy and when there is a biopsy there is a pathology specimen. If you have a basal cell and have seen your family practitioner there is no reason for a separate dermatology consult before surgery."

The dermatology department is currently planning other ways to help primary care physicians bring more dermatology care into their practices, Roenigk says.

Clinical Care
In addition to a dedicated dermatology inpatient treatment program and the diverse dermatologic surgery program, the Mayo Clinic offers an intensive 3-week inpatient psoriasis treatment program and maintains a phototherapy treatment center.

The psoriasis programs emphasize patient education about the disease as well as the importance of follow-up care, says Marian T. McEvoy, vice chair of the dermatology department. "Within that 3-week period there are stress management classes and when released patients will have an ongoing plan for how they will manage their disease," she says. Since many of these patients are referrals, some will follow up with outside community dermatologists.

Clinical care is also provided by dermatologists specializing in research and treatment of atopic dermatitis, cutaneous lymphoma, connective tissue disease, transplant, bullous disease, and contact/occupational dermatitis. Some of the more difficult conditions treated include lupus erythematosus, nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy, pyoderma gangrenosum, scleroderma, calciphylaxis, dermatomyositis, erythema multiforme, porphyrias, and vascular abnormalities.

Academics and Research
Dermatology academics and research are structured to be intertwined with patient care at the Mayo Clinic. "We have a comprehensive academic program that has been highly successful over a long period of time," says Roenigk, who is also chair of the dermatology residency program. Established in 1916, the Mayo Clinic Rochester has 25 residents and seven fellowship slots annually. "We are probably the largest academic clinical practice in the country at a single site center," says Roenigk "This brings a large educational aspect to our practice."

We also engage our residents and fellows in research because our education program requires a research or scholarly component," he adds. "Our residents are not only learning from the clinical practice, our faculty is full-time in the department, they are not just sitting as faculty part-time. Faculty are with the residents all the time."

While electronic health records are a recent development, the dermatology department has long been able to use the Mayo Clinic's meticulously-kept records to foster retrospective disease state and population-based studies. "If a research idea develops in our practice we are able to go back and look at patient records," explains Roenigk. A large research staff also helps to put prospective study protocols in place that use data gathered from the ongoing high-volume procedural and office dermatology practice.

As a result of these efforts, Mayo Clinic dermatologists consistently publish 52 to 65 unique research papers annually in peer-reviewed journals.

The Mayo Clinic also has an active Melanoma Study Group that is currently engaged in nine basic science and clinical trials. The research includes a blood and tissue repository for evaluating potential inheritable factors in families with melanoma and pancreatic cancer and a study to evaluate outcomes of radiation therapy following surgery for desmoplastic melanoma. Metastatic melanoma clinical trials include a phase 1 study of a poly (ADR-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, a phase 2 trial of an intravenous acylsulfonamide, and a phase 3 trial of intralesional allovectin-7.

Researchers are also evaluating a heat-shock vaccine and peptide vaccines combined with other agents for melanoma treatment as well as an investigational antibody plasma therapy.




University of California, San Francisco Medical Centers
San Francisco, California

An in-depth look into the many endeavors of the dermatology departments of the University of California, San Francisco Medical Centers reveals that clinical care is anchored by an underlying foundation of research and education. "We are basically the last resort for complex dermatology problems in the region," says Bruce Wintroub, MD, professor and chair, dermatology departments. "The clinical program is of high quality in every area that we operate in."

The UCSF Medical Centers, include the affiliated San Francisco General Hospital and VA Medical Center, and are strong in general dermatology, dermatologic surgery, including the 1,500 skin cancer procedures performed annually, cutaneous oncology, and dermatopathology.

The dermatology hospitalist program typifies how successful integration of education and research can emerge through quality clinical care. The first of its kind in the country, UCSF employs two dedicated dermatology hospitalists. A typical patient may be the 65-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease referred by his primary care physician for admission due to a severe psoriasis flare upon systemic steroid withdrawal.

There are more dramatic cases, says Lindy P. Fox, director, hospital consultation service, and assistant professor of clinical dermatology. She describes a patient with 40 percent of his upper thigh and leg eaten away by what was misdiagnosed as cellulitis with thrombocytosis after elective surgery. Fox was consulted just before the patient was to have interventional surgery in an attempt to debride the wound. "It was classic pyoderma gangrenosum that feeds on trauma," she says. Additional surgery would have worsened the condition.

While UCSF dermatology hospitalists treat many challenging conditions, they also specialize in treating graft vs. host disease, soft tissue infections, fungal infections, and fever with rash.

UCSF is developing a program to expand the dermatology hospitalist service outside the UCSF Medical Centers, says Timothy G. Berger, MD, director of clinics and executive vice chair, department of dermatology, and associate director of the dermatology residency program.

Pediatric dermatology
"Our pediatric dermatology program is a resource for the entire San Francisco Bay area and the West Coast, especially for vascular malformations in children, and has pioneered the understanding of therapy in that area," says Wintroub.

The Birthmarks and Vascular Anomalies Center was founded in 1991 and its seven-member staff is led by pediatric dermatologist and Director Ilona Frieden, MD. While patients are referred for more common capillary malformations such as port wine stains and salmon patches, the majority of referrals are for more debilitating and potentially life-threatening vascular tumors and malformations.

In addition to hemangiomas, the staff treats a variety of venous, lymphatic, arteriovenous, and mixed malformations including lymphangioma, cavernous hemangioma, glomangioma, Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome,and Proteus syndrome. Because many of these are chronic malformative diseases rather than curable vascular anomalies, treatment focuses on alleviating the most debilitating aspects of the disease.

Through the pediatric fellowship program, UCSF has seeded and propagated other vascular anomaly treatment programs that are now available in many dermatology centers, Berger says.

UCSF operates several outpatient skin care centers and according to Wintroub, has the largest phototherapy center on the West Coast. "We take patients with very serious skin disease who would have been hospitalized 20 years ago as outpatients." The skin care centers and phototherapy center treat 10 to 12 patients daily with aggressive topical treatment, systemic care, and phototherapy for their sometimes intractable psoriasis and eczema. The most difficult psoriasis cases are often incorporated into UCSF research protocols.

Conjunctive Programs
The UCSF dermatology community outreach efforts and its dermatopathology department are notable complements to the institution's clinical care programs.

The three full-time and two part-time dermatopathologists review about 80,000 tissue specimens each year and, of these, about 10,000 are previously prepared slides making diagnosis more challenging. "This is a very high-powered service," notes Wintroub. The department's special research interests include the molecular cytogenetics of melanoma, cutaneous lymphoma, vascular neoplasms, and inflammatory skin disease.

While 90 percent of the tissue specimens examined are referred from California and throughout the United States, the department does receive international requests. The department accepts glass slides, immunofluorescence samples, wet tissue specimens, and frozen tissue specimens.

Members of the UCSF dermatology department have long been active in community melanoma education and outreach. In 2007 the department built a playground shade structure and offered free skin cancer screenings, but in 2008 developed a more pointed approach. "We decided to have a community-based skin cancer screening in each of the ethnic neighborhoods to specifically tailor screening to the issues that address that community," explains Berger.

In 2008 the community-based screening program began with the gay community and focused on risk factors specific to the community such as increased sun exposure. In 2009 the UCSF skin cancer screening will target the Chinese-American community. "It will address their issues -- thinking they can't get skin cancer when, in fact, they can," Berger says. The screening programs are conducted in association with the American Academy of Dermatology and the local health department.

Research and Education
Successful research programs ultimately lead to better patient care and the UCSF dermatology department has consistently ranked among the top five in terms of National Institutes of Health research funding for the past decade, says Wintroub. In 2007 the department received 20 research grants totaling $2.6 million and in 2004 it received $3.5 million.

Areas of research encompass basic, clinical, and translational science as well as clinical investigation and UCSF research protocols are often carried out in conjunction with the affiliated VA Medical Center and San Francisco General Hospital. Current research focuses on the following:

Cutaneous oncology

Skin disease genetics

Virology pathogenesis

Translational epidemiology

Biology of permeability and skin barrier function

Photosensitivity

Carcinogenesis

Melanoma

Drug resistance

Immunology

Environmental and occupational contact dermatitis

Health policy science

HIV/AIDS-associated dermatologic disease

Hair and nail disorders

In addition, research within the dermatopathology department includes clinicopathologic studies and immunoperoxidase, ultrastructural, and molecular biologic investigation of the aspects of skin disease.

"Our educational program is marked by being among the most competitive dermatology residency programs in the country," Wintroub says. Post-residency fellowships are offered in pediatric dermatology, Moh's surgery, and diagnostic dermatopathology including ancillary diagnostic training in immunoperoxidase techniques and molecular biology.

Several research fellowships are offered annually and current areas of focus are clinical hair research, HIV dermatology, psoriasis, melanoma, and cutaneous oncology.
 
Last edited:
University of Michigan Health System
Ann Arbor, Michigan

Patients who are referred to university-affiliated dermatology departments can expect to find the latest in research-based treatment for their skin diseases. But at the University of Michigan Health System Department of Dermatology they also find something more: A level of care, and attention to detail, similar to what they would receive in a Ritz-Carlton.

The similarity to the famed hotel chain is no coincidence. Doctors and staff in the department receive training in patient care from Ritz-Carlton employees. It is emblematic of the way the department strives for excellence in everything that it does, according to Charles Ellis, MD, the William D. Taylor professor of dermatology and associate chair of the department. "We pride ourselves on being one of the top departments in patient care, research, and education," he says.

Research Forms Strong Foundation
As is the case with most highly-regarded academic medical departments, the UMHS dermatology department's reputation rests on strong research, both basic scientific and clinical. Its faculty members routinely publish in the leading journals of dermatology as well as publications such as The New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, and Nature, and their papers are frequently cited in the research of other authors.

The National Institutes of Health awarded the department $3.6 million in research grants in 2008, the fifth-highest amount among the nation's dermatology departments. In 2007 the department ranked third, with $4.2 million in funding.

Patients Rank Care Highly
Every year UMHS asks patients to rate the quality of care they receive, and for the past eight years the dermatology department has been ranked number one. The department's innovative Michigan Access Plan has reduced the waiting time to see a specialist from four months to about two weeks. As for teaching, medical school students have ranked the course department faculty members teach number one in the school for the past five years.

"These things don't happen by accident," says Ellis. "We decided we wanted to understand what makes for positive perceptions among patients, students, and researchers, and work on constantly improving all these areas." For example, he said, as part of their service training, staff and faculty get wallet cards with reminders on points such as returning phone calls promptly. "A little bit of training goes a long way," he says.

Commitment to Excellence Begins at Top
Faculty members credit John Voorhees, MD, FRCP, department chair and Duncan and Ella Poth Distinguished Professor, with creating an atmosphere of mentorship and collegiality in which excellence can thrive. "Everything we accomplish here starts with him. He places a lot of emphasis on mentorship, which makes everyone feel valued," says Timothy M. Johnson, MD, the Lewis and Lillian Becker Professor of Dermatology. "If you work hard and want to be mentored, you will succeed."

Voorhees has invested in the department's research infrastructure, hiring statisticians, photographers, and liaisons to institutional review boards, says Associate Professor Jeffrey Orringer, MD. "The department has seen fit to support a whole team of people necessary to help us carry out the high level of research that we do here," says Orringer.

Voorhees has chaired the department since 1975, and is only the fourth chair since its beginning in 1913. As a result, "there is a strong sense of continuity and stability in the direction of the department," Ellis says. A spirit of collegiality also contributes to the department's achievements. For example, clinicians encountering an unusual dermatologic case will routinely send a tissue sample to researchers for further study.

"Why would a clinician who's being run ragged stop what they're doing to give tissue to the lab when they'll probably never hear about it again? That's the usual paradigm. The difference is that at Michigan people really like each other and are excited to help each other. So a clinician seeing a patient with a melanoma on his skin is willing to take the time to say, &#8216;You're eligible for a study and I'd like you to talk to my research associate.' There's really no sense of turf here, and you won't find that attitude at many places."

The spirit of cooperation extends beyond the department. For example, Johnson collaborated with researchers from the university's Life Sciences Institute, Center for Stem Cell Biology, and several other departments in the medical school to produce an article on the causes of melanoma and other forms of cancer featured on the cover of the December 2008 issue of Nature.

Skin Cancer Program is Destination Program Target
Because of its reputation for excellence, the university has made the department's skin cancer treatment program the first to be marketed as part of the university's "destination program," designed to attract patients from around the world.

In doing so the university recognizes what local physicians, such as Michael Goldfarb, MD, have known for a long time. A dermatologist in Dearborn, Michigan, Goldfarb frequently refers patients to the University, even though many of his patients are elderly and reluctant to make the 40-mile drive to Ann Arbor. "I work very hard to persuade them to go, because I know it's not just the best center in the state, but one of the best in the world," he says.

Goldfarb recalled the case of an elderly patient who was diagnosed four years ago with what was considered fatal melanoma, and who was successfully treated in the University's Multidisciplinary Melanoma Clinic with an immunotherapy protocol developed there. As a result, he says, "every time I see him now it pleases me to know we have the UM program so close by."




Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina

A "small town" community atmosphere that fosters collaborative research is the hallmark of the Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center Department of Dermatology, a Clinical Center of Excellence.

Wake Forest's program, in spite of its small size, is well represented at education and advisory meetings, making a large contribution to dermatology, says Steven R. Feldman, MD, Director, Center for Dermatology Research. The depth of its research team is exemplified by its participation in the research and development of many of the latest drugs for the treatment of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and acne.

"Our publication and presentation numbers compare very favorably with many of the larger programs, in spite of our smaller faculty. We have seven faculty with enormous innovative research productivity, national and international presence in speaking and clinical care," says Alan B. Fleischer, Jr., MD, Chairman of the Department of Dermatology.

In this "small-town" community, dermatologists collaborate with clinicians and researchers in other disciplines at Wake Forest University Medical School (WFUSM). For example, with the use of imaging technology, dermatologists and neuroscientists are working together to determine what happens in the brain when patients scratch, why it feels so good &#8211; and why it can be difficult to stop.

Strong collaboration with other specialties bolsters the dermatology program at Wake Forest. "Joint appointments are a testament to the interdisciplinary work we do," says Feldman. Most of dermatology's clinical collaborations are with plastic surgery and otolaryngology while researchers work with their colleagues in family medicine, neurosciences, physiology/pharmacology, and public health sciences, Fleischer says.

Many of these efforts focus on underserved patients. "We have a tremendously productive collaboration with the rural health researchers in our Department of Family and Community Medicine. We are also working together to address skin disease issues in migrant Latino farm workers and other underserved populations," says Feldman.

International Presence Forms and Referrals
Boosted by a vibrant foreign fellowship program, Wake Forest's dermatology program extends far beyond the borders of North Carolina, drawing trainees from Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan, China, and Romania. This foreign presence strengthens the center's training program. The residency program draws more than 450 applicants for three annual resident positions. As one of the smaller residency programs in the country, it is analogous to a first-tier liberal arts college, with a faculty/resident ratio of about 1:1.

The Wake Forest dermatology department is a destination for patients with common and complex conditions. A balance between patient care, research, and education makes it a referral center for western North Carolina and surrounding states. "As a referral center, it gives us a strong base for educating dermatology residents and other trainees," says Feldman. "Our research focuses on clinically relevant, common problems facing dermatologists and our patients that supports our education programs and strengthens the patient care we provide."

Center for Dermatology Research
Founded in 1998, the Center for Dermatology Research has participated in groundbreaking treatments and notable discoveries.

Feldman's research on the relationship between patient compliance with treatment and outcome is one example. "Perhaps our most recent groundbreaking discovery is our finding that patients with skin disease are poorly adherent to their topical treatment regimens," he says. "That work has profoundly changed how dermatologists view some of our most basic concepts of topical drug effects and is changing how many dermatologists approach treatment planning."

He cites as an example the case of 16-year-old girl with severe psoriasis of the scalp. She'd tried traditional treatments, which failed, and was referred to the department by a dermatologist in South Carolina as a candidate for a new expensive biological treatment.

"We saw her and managed to control her scalp psoriasis with an inexpensive topical medication in just one week," says Feldman. Based on his research on patients' adherence to topical therapy he managed her disease simply by monitoring how she used the medications. "We were able to get much better control of the disease with a treatment she had previously used, by simply changing how she used the medication," he explains.

In collaboration with the university's Public Health Sciences Division, Wake Forest's research efforts extend beyond the clinical. Feldman's research on the economic impact of gatekeeping measures that were restricting patients' access to dermatologists in the early 1990s helped remove barriers to care.

"In the 1990s, gatekeeping managed care systems were threatening to eliminate dermatology as a specialty. We provided much of the research demonstrating the quality and cost effectiveness of dermatologists in the management of skin diseases," says Feldman. "Today we continue to have a vibrant specialty."

WFSUM also developed cost-effective treatment algorithms for psoriasis. In a collaborative research effort, and with the assistance of a researcher in the WFUSM psychiatry department, researchers studied the impact of chronic diseases like psoriasis on a patient's mental health and quality of life.

Treatment of patents with autoimmune skin diseases is another area of concentration. "This was possible only because of the strength of our clinical program and its ability to attract patients with rare autoimmune skin diseases from hundreds of miles away," says Feldman. "They drive right by Duke and UNC to get here!"

The center also studied the addictive properties of indoor tanning. "This [research] has critical implications for efforts to reduce excessive UV exposure and was only possible because of the ability at WFUSM to collaborate with an outstanding addiction researcher in our Department of Physiology & Pharmacology," Feldman says.

New Promising Research
Patients with chronic pruritus may soon find relief, based on research by Wake Forest dermatologist Gil Yosipovitch, MD, a pruritus specialist. Patients occasionally report that intense scratching &#8211; to the point of drawing blood &#8211; is the only thing that relieves the chronic pruritus. Yosipovitch has found that certain areas of the brain are activated when a patient scratches; by understanding the brain relationship to scratching, new treatments can be developed for 30 million patients with eczema and kidney dialysis patients bothered by pruritus.

The department also is studying lymphoma. "Right now we are developing gene rearrangement studies for T-cell lymphomas of the skin," says Fleischer. "It allows earlier and more definite diagnosis. It's a molecular fingerprint of cancer."

Award and Recognitions
The number of published works by members of the dermatology department are too numerous to list, notes Feldman. The founding chair of the department, Joseph Jorizzo, MD, is one of the lead authors of the textbook, Dermatology, considered to be a standard reference book in the field. "Our faculty publish in the top clinical dermatology journals on a regular basis," says Feldman. "The editor of one of these journals quipped that he has a separate inbox just for papers from our department."

Feldman has received numerous awards. He is the recipient of the 2006 Clarence Livingood Lectureship, one of the most prestigious awards given by the American Academy of Dermatology. He received in 2005 a presidential citation from the AAD for his work in psoriasis education. This year, Feldman also received an Astellas Award honoring research that has improved public health in the field of dermatology.

Feldman recalls a compliment from a basic science researcher who told him, "I have been toiling away for 20 years in basic skin immunology and finally my work is about to make a difference in the clinic. I'm so jealous of the research you do, because every one of your papers is making an immediate impact on how patients with skin disease are being treated."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Does graduating from a lower ranked/regarded or community program (vs university affiliated) matter at all for future job prospects (both private practice and academia)?
 
Not really. Although if you want to land at a bigger academic center, a larger academic affiliated program may facilitate your preparation better than a small community program.

Getting into a Derm residency program is the hard part by far.
 
Top