- Joined
- Mar 4, 2010
- Messages
- 18
- Reaction score
- 9
Not every rotation needs to be at the NIH and not every attending needs to be on the cusp of curing cancer (or somatic dysfunction) but to argue against the need for elevated standards blows my mind. For most DO students, they don't get a chance to see what a real teaching institution is like until fourth year; by then, most of our minds are made up and we are focusing on our speciality and fluff electives rather than the fundamentals. IMHO, the best reason to address any "anti-DO" bias is by addressing some of the root cause issues.
I completely agree with this statement. At the end of my 3rd year, I did not know how to write SOAP notes or how to properly present a patient because 1) I was never given the opportunity to and 2) these old physicians do not even do these things properly themselves so I had no example to learn from. I feared for the worst as I started my 4th year away rotations at teaching hospitals but luckily I wasn't ******ed and was able to adapt quickly before being discovered. Like I said to one poster via PM, my 2 blocks of IM was done outpatient, one with a private nephrologist and the other with a general IM outpatient. I never saw ACS, PE, acute CHF, AKI, AMS, alcohol withdrawal, DVT, ARDS, etc....just some of the very basics of medicine. If it wasn't for my 4th year rotations, my residency program would have been surprised to have such a clueless intern.