- Joined
- Mar 19, 2003
- Messages
- 2,212
- Reaction score
- 30
And no, Ive never done plaintiffs work. Defense in the one case I've been involved in.
No, it is because you have no credibility if you only work defense. Pay is generally the same.
Hmm....
The maker quoted by the "expert" was Q3T3, not "S1Q3T3."S1Q3T3 has a specificity of 50%, maybe, but we need to look at positive predictive value not specificity. In this case you might argue he had a low pre-test probability so the PPV was low. If PPV was 50% I think you'd be hard pressed NOT to scan the kid or at least do a d-dimer.
S1Q3T3 has a specificity of 50%, maybe, but we need to look at positive predictive value not specificity. In this case you might argue he had a low pre-test probability so the PPV was low. If PPV was 50% I think you'd be hard pressed NOT to scan the kid or at least do a d-dimer.
I think your number is probably close.Birdstrike -- You never gave a price/hr for this sort of case. What's your guess? I've heard $500/hr, but a big name like him ought to bring in a lot more, I would think. How much?
?Breaking News...
Birdstrike likes bumping this post every so often so that it goes back to the front page. At this point, it's gradually becoming a little less about the absurdity of the case and a little more of the "I hate Peter Rosen" show.
Birdstrike likes bumping this post every so often so that it goes back to the front page. At this point, it's gradually becoming a little less about the absurdity of the case and a little more of the "I hate Peter Rosen" show.
OK, that's just weird, dude. You post cryptic **** in a drive by fashion, then don't follow up. Whatever is this "breaking news" (which doesn't seem to be), either put up, or shut up.
If it's "breaking news", then patience isn't what is needed. Spill it, man!Patience, my friend. Patience...