Which Would You Choose?

[subadoob]

I was hoping to get some advice from current students (the further in school the better) about which school I should pick. I know about the other threads; "Choose where you feel most comfortable" and "You can get a good education anywhere as long as you apply yourself," but I'm still stuck. It's between DMU and Scholl; DMU offers $5000 and Scholl offers the big $15000. The last podiatrist I asked said he sees good students from both universities but called it a "no brainer" for Scholl; coming out with less debt especially since podiatrists aren't necessarily making much right out of school. There is the cost-of-living difference but it seems splitting an apartment at the Woodlands Apartments next to Scholl is no more than $200 a month more than what I might get in Des Moines. Maybe could someone provide some numbers of how much debt they've picked up, what scholarships they have and if the budget provided by the schools (e.g ~$50000 a year for either school, which includes everything) is about right? Also, from what I've read on these forums, DMU may have a better managed schedule for the first two years; I guess some Scholl students feel more swamped before the first board exams than DMU students. Naturally, in order to maintain or receive any other scholarships and to get into good clerkships, you have to keep the GPA up and I figured I would have a better chance of doing so at DMU because of how the curriculum is set-up. Clinical experience is important but a podiatrist told me understanding the information, i.e. what you learn first few years, is most important and "once you've seen a few, you seen them all,". Going strictly by classroom/lab education, I'd say DMU because they have new facilities and (possibly) higher board pass rates. Thanks in advance for the advice and congrats on the acceptances Class of 2016.

---

Members don't see this ad.

 

[MaxillofacialMN]

are those scholarships per year or total?

 

[SuperFeisty]

I was hoping to get some advice from current students (the further in school the better) about which school I should pick. I know about the other threads; "Choose where you feel most comfortable" and "You can get a good education anywhere as long as you apply yourself," but I'm still stuck. It's between DMU and Scholl; DMU offers $5000 and Scholl offers the big $15000. The last podiatrist I asked said he sees good students from both universities but called it a "no brainer" for Scholl; coming out with less debt especially since podiatrists aren't necessarily making much right out of school. There is the cost-of-living difference but it seems splitting an apartment at the Woodlands Apartments next to Scholl is no more than $200 a month more than what I might get in Des Moines. Also, from what I've read on these forums, DMU may have a better managed schedule for the first two years; I guess some Scholl students feel more swamped before the first board exams than DMU students. Naturally, in order to maintain or receive any other scholarships and to get into good clerkships, you have to keep the GPA up and I figured I would have a better chance of doing so at DMU because of how the curriculum is set-up. Clinical experience is important but a podiatrist told me understanding the information, i.e. what you learn first few years, is most important and "once you've seen a few, you seen them all,". Going strictly by classroom/lab education, I'd say DMU because they have new facilities and (possibly) higher board pass rates. Thanks in advance for the advice and congrats on the acceptances Class of 2016.

Yes

 

[dtrack22]

...

 

[subadoob]

are those scholarships per year or total?

Thanks for the reply, they are per year for both schools. I was worried about what you have to do to keep the $15k from Scholl; from the website, it seems only 15 of those scholarships are available so I would guess I would have to be in the top 20-15% to maintain it. To those who are out of school, how big of a deal is an extra $30k (quick estimate of extra tuition for four years needed to go to DMU instead of Scholl, including interest) during your residency/early years of practice? Thanks again everyone (minus the one who answered, "yes").

 

[subadoob]

You need Ankle Breaker to clarify how many people keep the $15k scholarship after first year and how easy/difficult it is to be one of those people.

At DMU, depending on the conditions of your scholarship, it can be tough to finish in the top 25% (essentially top 13) to keep that scholarship. However, there are some students who only need to keep a 3.0 to keep their $4k per year, that isn't terribly difficult. There doesn't seem to be a whole lot of rhyme or reason (from a students perspective) on how scholarship amounts and conditions are given, but it's important to pay attention to because it can make a big difference on how much you are likely to get over 4 years.

That's a very important point, thank you. A $15k scholarship is nice but if I have a better chance (i.e. higher % of students who get the scholarships or lower GPA requirements) to maintain the $5k from DMU then that's +1 for DMU in my books

 

[amaprez]

From the scholl website:

http://www.rosalindfranklin.edu/sch...e/studentservices/scholarshipinformation.aspx

Sounds like you need a 3.4 GPA or higher to renew it.


From the DMU FAQ:

http://www.dmu.edu/pm/frequently-asked-questions/

"These awards are renewable for students maintaining class rank within the top 25% of their class for up to 4 years."

 

[subadoob]

I'll clarify on the scholarship situation.

So the moral of the story is nothing is guaranteed but there is plenty of opportunity to apply for the various scholarships Scholl offers to its students.

Thanks for the reply AMA: I knew about the 25% at DMU but I couldn't find anything regarding Scholl. I even called Scholl several times but I couldn't get a hold of Ms. Young at the Admissions Office, thanks for your time.
Ankle Breaker+Dtrack: Thanks for your input, I know you guys have a good hold on what goes on at Scholl and DMU, respectively, I really appreciate the help.
It seems like no matter where I go, I'll have to try my best if I want any scholarships. The whole 2nd-year finals/part-1 boards scheduling thing is something I'll just have to deal with although it seems DMU students are a little less stressed out around that time but I wouldn't know. I have to choose Monday morning, I'll let guys know the outcome, thanks again and any other input is much appreciated.

 

[bobdolerson]

It's tough to even imagine the competition you'll face for those scholarships.

Best bet would be to assume you won't get them past the first year, and go from there. Last thing you want to do is be specifically attending a school for the scholarship only to find out you won't get it.

I was pretty consistently a top performer in undergrad, and an equal amount of effort here would have likely put me in the bottom 5% of students. When I dominate an exam here (ie, grade of 95+), it generally has correlated to a period of time when I didn't get to ever see my wife or do anything but study.

Passing a class isn't hard, getting a B takes considerably more effort, but the effort required to absolutely know enough material to consistently be in the top 25% of the students can be pretty substantial. All it takes is that one stupid day before an exam where you get a migraine and can't study, and BAM...5 points below the class average.

You'll have to decide for yourself how much free time you want, but no matter what, there /will/ be a trade-off. There will not be a point at which you know every detail that can be tested over, and probably rarely a time where you can say "there's really nothing else to study, I'ma grab a beer". It's tougher because I'm married and I have to maintain a home life as well, so being single I thing would be quite an advantage, grade wise.

 

[amaprez]

Very true. Top 25% requirement is pretty much telling most recipients they won't be getting renewed. It's also very ingenious by the school.

 

[MaxillofacialMN]

Very true. Top 25% requirement is pretty much telling most recipients they won't be getting renewed. It's also very ingenious by the school.

It's better than law school that puts GPA requirements on it. Almost no students get their scholarships renewed.

 

[amaprez]

It's better than law school that puts GPA requirements on it. Almost no students get their scholarships renewed.

Law school scholarships are different, because even if they say 3.0+ gpa requirement, sometimes if law school happens to grade on a curve, you can get 80% on a test and still not get a B if class average was higher. There was actually a NY Times article about this situation.

As far as I'm aware, most pod schools don't curve their tests. A 3.0+ gpa requirement is a 3.0+ gpa requirement.

 

[MaxillofacialMN]

Law school scholarships are different, because even if they say 3.0+ gpa requirement, sometimes if law school happens to grade on a curve, you can get 80% on a test and still not get a B if class average was higher. There was actually a NY Times article about this situation.

As far as I'm aware, most pod schools don't curve their tests. A 3.0+ gpa requirement is a 3.0+ gpa requirement.

That's what I mean! Law schools tricks the heck out of their students!

 

[amaprez]

That's what I mean! Law schools tricks the heck out of their students!

Nah, that's just how they teach the students to be good lawyers

 

[bobdolerson]

That's what I mean! Law schools tricks the heck out of their students!

My dad used to tell me about that. He said he had a prof that, in a class of 150 students, gave out 15 As to the top grades, 45 Bs, and some other distribution for the rest. Doesn't matter if you get a 97.5 if 15 students get 100s...

What made it worse was he said the class was easier than other classes as far as scoring high on a test, but still ended up being most students worst grade that quarter. I don't really think that's a fair system, as it does little to describe how well a student performed in a class, and doesn't translate well to overall GPA unless every single class worked that way (and then it would actually be a pretty magnificent way to grade...the difference in professors and how hard they test would disappear, and your GPA would be a close representation of how you /compared/ to other students).

GPAs have always been a touchy subject for me, as i recall going to a class in undergrad that required a ridiculous amount of studying only to walk away with a B, and had a friend take the class with an easy prof, studied minimally, and got an A. I suppose that's why I always just kind of nod and say, "yeah, okay *wink*" when someone talks up their GPA. Too easy to manipulate, too hard to get a good reading of how much work they put into it.

It is a pretty good move by the schools. It's not unfair, though the difficulty in maintaining it sure seems that way. It's not really the school's fault or problem, it's just a problem in explaining to students how much more effort grad school is, and I don't think that's something someone can really understand till they get here.

It sucks. All it takes is one class (for me it was anatomy, 6.5 hours) that drops you out of scholarship range, and it's not easy to get back into it.

 

[Madura]

If you are really concerned about money and want to be the only pod student to leave school without spending or borrowing a dime, DMU is offering a new opportunity this year similar to what the federal government gives MD and DO students. This is complete loan forgiveness (they pay for your school) if you agree to work 4 years in an underserved Iowa city after residency. I personally don't want to be told where to work, but it is an unbelievable opportunity if you don't mind that. Many people leave school with big dreams of a big practice in a big city and end up finding those cities saturated and make bank in smaller midwest towns anyway ... something to think about.

 

[subadoob]

If you are really concerned about money and want to be the only pod student to leave school without spending or borrowing a dime, DMU is offering a new opportunity this year similar to what the federal government gives MD and DO students. This is complete loan forgiveness (they pay for your school) if you agree to work 4 years in an underserved Iowa city after residency. I personally don't want to be told where to work, but it is an unbelievable opportunity if you don't mind that. Many people leave school with big dreams of a big practice in a big city and end up finding those cities saturated and make bank in smaller midwest towns anyway ... something to think about.

Yeah, I know about that scholarship; serve in an area in Iowa with less than 20k people. I like Iowa, just not that much. I'm expecting to accumulate debt like most students, I just hope to keep everything as far under $180k as possible (During an interview, one student told me some borrow as much as $220k).

 

[Madura]

Yeah, I know about that scholarship; serve in an area in Iowa with less than 20k people. I like Iowa, just not that much. I'm expecting to accumulate debt like most students, I just hope to keep everything as far under $180k as possible (During an interview, one student told me some borrow as much as $220k).

Did these posts help answer your question? It looks like you wanted info to help you decide where to go, but so far we only addressed the financial component. Was that your only concern or do you want more info about DMU such as the technology, the free laptop and ipad, cost of living, etc? It may be easier to just search some of my recent posts b/c I have talked a lot about it recently.

 

[bobdolerson]

As far as loan forgiveness programs go, be sure to find out all applicable information before you sign anything or agree to anything. I don't think there are unlimited positions available, and sometimes the fine print will get you good.

Going back to the OP, don't go to a school because you think the GPA will be easier to keep up. I don't think DMU will make it any easier for you to get a solid GPA, and the schools calculate them differently (ie, DMU is staggered, so a student may have an identical "out of 100" grade and a lower GPA by several tenths (ie, 92 at DMU is a 3.7, I believe, and a 4.0 at many other schools).

GPA isn't nearly as important as class rank, and as far as getting a residency goes, DMU has 100% placement and has for years. I like the school, though I won't tell you it's the best for /you/, it was just my best choice and I feel I made the right one.

They gave me the maximum scholarship ($4k), renewable each year by being in the top 25% (basically meaning it's a one year scholarship. I've got a wife at home, and the work required to be in the top 25% is /substantially/ different than it was in undergrad, and I would rather pay a few thousand more a year and have a home-life, so that's something to consider)

The cost of living here is pretty low, no problem living within the loans (my wife also works, so money isn't a huge issue for me, but i got along fine for a few months before she moved up, never went over my monthly allotment) and the city is very family-oriented. There are no beaches, there's a small downtown with 2-3 bars (that anyone seems to go to, anyway), but there's a lot in the way of parks, bike trails, etc.

Des Moines is a nice enough place to live, but after coming from San Antonio, and going to Texas A&M, the city is tiny and the night life is non-existent. It was a rude wake up call going out at 1am trying to find some place for some munchies, and even most of the gas stations were closed...that's just lame.

The school, though, is fantastic and I'll spout it's merits to anyone who will listen. The people are incredibly friendly, the interprofessional relationships between practices (ie, DO, DPM, DPT, etc) are solid and mutually respectful. There has only been one time when I was talked down to for being a DPM, but it wasn't really intentionally disrespectful as much as it was just kind of a dumb DO that didn't know what our education was.

I'm not sure if you wanted this, or what other info you were looking for, but if you have any more questions regarding DMU or any aspects of the school/city, please let me know here or in a PM and I'll be more than happy to answer them.

 

[dtrack22]

....

 

[bobdolerson]

oop, guess I wasn't so awesome

 

[amaprez]

Historically, does DMU and AZPOD have a really high first-time pass rate? Absolutely. Yes, they have the most MINIMALLY competent students attending their respective schools...congrats.

Oh boy. Here we go. Just when this thread was winding down too

 

[bobdolerson]

Hmm....the thing about GPA is, at least here, it's not staggered for each class, just overall.

So say you get 4 As, a 92 in each class.

At Scholl you walk out with a 4.0

At DMU you walk out with a 3.7

So no...it's not really comparable. I'm not saying one is better or worse than the other, I'm simply saying that this is why you can't really lend a whole lot of credence to a GPA, especially considering you aren't taking our exams, and neither are we taking yours, so you're comparing apples to bananas.

I don't really know where this came from, I wasn't trying to compare my school to any, I was just providing information about why I chose it, and why GPA isn't as important as class rank. It's a better comparison, I would think, to look at class rank, as a person in the top x% of a class is likely similar in knowledge and motivation as a person from another school with a similar rank, regardless of whether or not their GPAs match up.

 

[flyhi]

AB and Dtrack, do most students move closer to downtown when rotations start? If so, OP, the cost of living may be significantly different for your comparison of Scholl v DMU based on that alone.

 

[dtrack22]

...