Why don't payors push for more spine surgeries in ASC?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

101N

Membership Revoked
Removed
10+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
5,313
Reaction score
1,085
http://www.beckersasc.com/orthopedi...how-spine-surgery-reimbursement-compares.html

Assuming that the ASC is in panel -and there is no gouging or bait-and-switch to fusion when decompression alone would work - the ASC far and away a MUCH less expensive environment. Lowing cost is a part of the Triple Aim.

ASCs vs. Hospitals: How Spine Surgery Reimbursement Compares
Written by Laura Miller | June 17, 2012

Dr. Richard Wohns | reimbursement | spinal surgeon | spine surgery | surgery centerAt the 10th Annual Orthopedic, Spine and Pain Management Review Conference in Chicago on June 15, Richard W. Wohns, MD, JD, MBA, of South Sound Neurosurgery gave a presentation titled “Comparing the Reimbursement of Spine Procedures: ASCs vs. Hospitals.” He touched on several important points when comparing clinical and financial data in hospitals versus ambulatory surgery centers.

“The Milliman guidelines are out there but the only way to counter them is to perform quality studies that show it’s more cost-effective to perform spine surgery in appropriately indicated patients than perform additional conservative care,” he said. “These types of studies are the only way to counter Milliman guidelines that are preventing payors from authorizing surgeries we think are important. It has to be done in the literature showing what we are doing really adds to quality of life for a lower cost.”

Highlight cost savings in payor contracts. When dealing with payors for new contracts, it’s important to highlight the benefits of performing spine surgery in an ASC. “Here are the driving factors and numbers that are the compelling arguments that you have to do with payors: charges are $119,529 for the hospital and $37,967 in the outpatient surgery center for the Puget Sound area,” said Dr. Wohns. “When I started negotiating, I would sit down with medical directors and teach them what it meant to them and their subscribers to perform cases in the ASC. Now they are coming to us to see if we can bring their patients to our center. The cost numbers is the most compelling argument you can make if you take a two-level ADF with insurance payors.”

Negotiate down implant prices. Many implants have become commodities, making it easier to negotiate down implant prices with device companies. However, this may take some sacrifice from the physicians. “After surgeons give up their connections with device companies, you can aggressively negotiate with them,” said Dr. Wohns. “If the surgeon can give up that relationship and realize that a cage is a cage and a pedicle is a pedicle, they are going to see a significant cost difference.”

Surgeons are performing increasingly more complex procedures in the surgery center, including artificial disc replacement, anterior lumbar interbody fusions and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions through a minimally invasive procedure. Dr. Wohns also shared some of his comparative data:

For single level minimally invasive instrumented posterior lumbar fusion:
Total bill charges for inpatient: $75,663
Total bill charges for outpatient ASCs: $42,500
Average insurance payment for inpatient: $26,711
Average insurance payment for outpatient ASCs: $23,208

For single level minimally invasive TLIF:
Total billed charges for inpatient: $160,606
Total billed charges for outpatient ASCs: $45,499
Average insurance payment for inpatient: $59,251
Average insurance payment for outpatient ASCs: $25,000

Members don't see this ad.
 
The insurers probably have a bad taste in their mouth for ASCs because of the gouging done by out of network ASCs. Anyone know of any state laws passes which have prevented the gouging...I think Illinois was proposing one but don't know if it passed. Aetna sued a few ASCs in New Jersey and California but I don't know if there has been a verdict yet.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
All of our ASCs in the area are of the "bait and switch" variety, especially those that do pain procedures. It costs up to 2-3 times the total cost in a hospital and 10-20 times that of an office when the unsuspecting victims are pillaged by the unscupulous and the unethical ASC doctors.
 
All of our ASCs in the area are of the "bait and switch" variety, especially those that do pain procedures. It costs up to 2-3 times the total cost in a hospital and 10-20 times that of an office when the unsuspecting victims are pillaged by the unscupulous and the unethical ASC doctors.

We have the opposite situation in my area. Hospitals use obfuscation to conceal their charges from both payors and patients. One even build it's on ASC and advertises it as such, but bills HOPD rates.
 
We have the opposite situation in my area. Hospitals use obfuscation to conceal their charges from both payors and patients. One even build it's on ASC and advertises it as such, but bills HOPD rates.

I have heard of this happening with attached ASC to a hospital. Looks like an ASC, smells like an ASC, joint venture with docs and hospital, like an ASC. Bills hospital codes... until last year when they stopped this.
 
Medicare charges & reimbursements for the top inpatient dx by hospital.

https://data.cms.gov/Medicare/Inpatient-Prospective-Payment-System-IPPS-Provider/97k6-zzx3

460 Spinal Fusion except cervical: https://data.cms.gov/Medicare/Inpatient-Prospective-Payment-System-IPPS-Provider/97k6-zzx3

473 ACDF: https://data.cms.gov/Medicare/Inpatient-Prospective-Payment-System-IPPS-Provider/97k6-zzx3

491 Back and Neck Proc Exc Spinal Fusion: https://data.cms.gov/Medicare/Inpatient-Prospective-Payment-System-IPPS-Provider/97k6-zzx3

552 Medical Back Problems: https://data.cms.gov/Medicare/Inpatient-Prospective-Payment-System-IPPS-Provider/97k6-zzx3

Our two local hospitals billed charges:

For Profit Not-for-profit

460 62,599.29 64,688.87

473 47,581.07 36,938.84

491 23,110.13 17,205.28

552 N/A 13,924.32
 
Last edited:
http://www.beckersasc.com/asc-codin...-new-legislation-seeks-to-narrow-the-gap.html

The Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality and Access Act of 2013 was introduced in the US Senate by Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) and is expected to be introduced into the House of Representatives in the near future as well.

The Ambulatory Surgery Center Association supports the Act, which is intended to preserve patient access to care provided in ASCs. The bill would fix a flaw in current laws allowing Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to use different measures of inflation for ASCs and hospital outpatient departments when setting rates, according to an ASCA news release.

Fixing this disparity would prevent procedures from migrating into more expensive HOPDs from ASCs and encourages cost savings to Medicare and its beneficiaries. The legislation also requires implementing a value-based purchasing program to encourage ASC and government collaboration for additional savings.

Finally, the legislation would direct CMS to add a representative of the ASC community to the Advisory Panel on Hospital Outpatient Payment, as decisions made impact both HOPD and ASC facility fees and eligible procedures, and require CMS to disclose which six criteria would trigger excluding a procedure from the ASC-approved list.
 
I think it's political. Insurance companies negotiate with hospitals on a huge range of different issues, so they have plenty of leverage to keep procedure costs low in exchange for being more lenient on other issues. Since ASC's don't do anything but procedures, the insurance companies have significantly less leverage on them and can't get as good a deal. Generally in these situations the economic explanation is as far as you need to go in my opinion.
 
Top