I have pretty serious foot problems--not to the point where I cannot walk, but certainly to the point where I cannot walk long in heels without considerable foot pain. I wear orthotics and have to choose shoes based on which will accommodate those orthotics. Generally, I end up with Naot shoes--very expensive but "forgiving." During one of my interviews at a leading medical school, one of the faculty interviewers complimented me on my shoes, saying that they looked both cute and comfortable. I was embarrassed and confessed my shoe challenges and the interviewer asked me to send her a link to the Naot site, talking for a while about how hard it was to find supportive, "sensible" shoes that are not grandmotherly.
I defer to
@DokterMom and our other kind advisors on this thread, but I have to say that "shoe sins" seem to be venial rather than mortal shortcomings. While I have to acknowledge that dressing for interviews is dictated by the Rules of the Game, and that "haftas" include professional dress and footwear, I respectfully beg to differ from the stance that it is "wrong" to "deviate from [the midheel pump] ideal." I can't pretend to be a medical expert, but I don't remember reading any arguments that heels are good for feet--rather, the opposite seems to be true.
Again, I am not a doctor yet, and I understand the need to look professional, but I question the "wrongness" of foot-friendly shoes that are not casual or clunky.