- Joined
- Mar 20, 2016
- Messages
- 44
- Reaction score
- 35
Interesting. I can’t tell if you’re being insightful or cynical. How do you know Ahlquist worked EM or changed career paths just for the money? We can all agree that infrastructure development in rapidly growing areas has its hiccups. I think we owe it to ourselves and those we serve to make it as seamless as possible and work effectively with what resources we’re given. Hopefully these developments are with good intentions.
It's possible that I'm being a little insightful and a little cynical. As I said, I think this medical center likely has a place, and I do hope that it does well, but I'm' not impressed with what I know of it so far. I've met Ahlquist a couple of times, but would NOT say that I know him personally. That's why I used the phrase "from what I understand." This is what I have heard about him from people that know him slightly better than I do. As far as infrastructure development in rapidly growing areas, you are correct that there are a lot of hiccups, and the Boise area has probably more than it's fair share. A new medical center focused on serving an area with major population growth is needed, but the opportunity to make yourself money is usually more motivating for a lot of people than purely good intentions.
I appreciate your views and I am actually enjoying the discussions in this thread. It is better for everyone to have an open forum, especially when it comes to a new school like ICOM. As someone from the area that goes to UW, what are your thoughts on ICOM in general? What is the general consensus in the state/area if you think there is one.
I agree with Dr. Rainbow that they community loves ICOM, and while I have always looked at ICOM with a skeptical eye, I do think that I personally have come around to the idea of it being pretty alright. They seem to have worked very hard to make sure that it is a good school that provides a quality education. I remain skeptical on how well it will serve Idaho and what it needs from providers (mostly numbers and an understanding especially of rural needs). Some people in the community truly seem to believe that every doctor that graduates from ICOM will return to the state (or at least a good portion), and I think everyone on this forum knows that is not true. They also appear to be pretty focused on the more urban areas of Idaho and the region, and those are not really the areas that need more providers (at least not as much as rural communities). I also have always had concerns about how they will fit so many students in to rotations in the area and how that will affect the quality of education. It appears that they may fix this problem by sending a majority of their student outside of Idaho, which doesn't exactly contribute to them falling in love with the state and eventually returning.