While I agree with some of @Mad Jack to some extent, I disagree in the fact that you don't see these as UNE specific issues. I mentioned this in a previous post. Even schools with some of the most strict disciplinary and academic policies (see: LECOM) have pathways that cater to different learning styles. That is all we are asking the administration to recognize. Implementing a poorly organized policy after we have already committed to coming to a school under the pretense that attendance wasn't mandatory in second year is far more problematic, in my opinion.
I can't comment on the Deans at other schools, but it feels as if we are being silenced. I mentioned that we've exhausted all avenues of trying to voice concerns, but I feel that I need to be more specific. We have coordinated meetings with course directors and the deans, only to have them filter what items we can/cannot add to agendas. "Attendance" is an off-limits topic that they refuse to comment on. This is entirely ignorant: 120 students from our class show up to a meeting to express concerns only to find out that we'll be discussing furniture in the student lounge instead. So we arrange follow-up meetings, form committees, only to have these ideas completely dismissed as well. If you have suggestions for a better way to approach these issues, I am open ears.
In other news, this whole situation is very real and not being exaggerated. Lawyers are getting involved on both the University and student side of the spectrum. It is a shame that the University has let it come to this.
There's a point where going about things the "right way" just no longer works. This is why students are posting on these forums. The "right way" has not worked, and does not seem poised to change any time soon. People keep making comments about how we are "derailing" the purpose of this thread. In fact, as a prospective medical student weighing my options on which schools to attend, these are exactly the pieces of information I would want to know. Please stop giving folks a hard time for offering genuine feedback that is designed to be beneficial. I wish I had this information prior to applying here, I know it certainly would have impacted my decision on which school to attend.
The tone of this post compared to the tone of the others is vastly different. This one I'm sure prospective students are willing to take into consideration. It actually gives us very valuable information on the infrastructure of the school.
Yelling at students to never ever considering going to this school and telling them to run far away, however, is detrimental. I know this is an emotionally charged moment for many 2nd years at UNE, but the last couple of posts have in fact derailed. This thread is to give information, but it's also to guide and congratulate those that have worked hard and made it this far. Imagine it being the only option you have and being excited to start a new chapter in your life, then coming here and seeing this mess. Not every have the luxury of waiting it out another year.
You guys need to give your opinion maturely and soundly like you did here. Medical school is no different than the rest of the workforces in the world, and much like them many /real/ issues will be ignored by administration in favor of their own agenda.
We want to hear about the issues and decide on our own. What we don't want is people telling us we are buying a one way ticket to the purgatory. Believe it or not, some people have more things in their life to worry about than a mandatory lecture policy. For some it is not a deal breaker and that's okay. But putting those people under stress by saying the entire system is flawed and will go down in flames is neither mature nor helpful.