- Joined
- Dec 14, 2004
- Messages
- 3,904
- Reaction score
- 4
there was one for 30, so i figured i would start one for this. and would you mind telling your diagnostic progress? dont be shy, be proud...
I didn't mean to suggest that you shouldn't have lofty goals. Nor am I in a position to be criticizing anyone for wanting to aim for a 40 (with the possible exception of Shrike ) But I do believe that one's goals should be contextually reasonable based on the rest of his/her application. If you don't need the 40 to balance some other inadequacy on your application, why not spend your time doing other things, like volunteering, research, or shadowing, that will greatly strengthen your application and make you a more well-rounded applicant? Because the top medical schools care about those things, too. Applicants with high MCATs are a dime a dozen at top medical schools; you won't stand out that way. What makes you stand out are the nonacademic intangibles. Bottom line: if you are a traditional student with excellent grades, you will be fine with a score in the 30s or possibly even the high 20s, regardless of where you want to go. (Think about it: if 34 or 35 is the average at the most prestigious schools, and several people who go there have 40s, then some others must have scored in the high 20s and low 30s to average it out, right?)
Again, my best suggestion to you is still the same: stop hanging out at SDN for the next two months until you take the test, and study so that you can do the best you are capable of doing. You already know what you have to do to earn a high score. You need to go out now and do it.
Good luck to you, shredder, and everyone else taking in April.
*checks MCAT score*
*leaves thread*
Goodness, this thread is so old that you probably weren't even in college yet, and most of us (including the OP) will be graduating from med school in another year or two.*checks MCAT score*
*leaves thread*
Goodness, this thread is so old that you probably weren't even in college yet, and most of us (including the OP) will be graduating from med school in another year or two.
I still stand by my previous statements. A 40+ MCAT is definitely *not* necessary to get into med school, and it will *not* make up for an app that is subpar in other respects (GPA, ECs, etc.).
QofQuimica, if u dont mind sharing...was your success on the mcat repeated on the boards? Step 1 in paticular...what did you score if you dont mind me asking? which did you find to be more difficult to prepare for? and finally....which test was more mentally taxing..in terms of stress pressure anxiety...
I haven't taken Step 1 yet.QofQuimica, if u dont mind sharing...was your success on the mcat repeated on the boards? Step 1 in paticular...what did you score if you dont mind me asking? which did you find to be more difficult to prepare for? and finally....which test was more mentally taxing..in terms of stress pressure anxiety...
40+ requires everything that getting 35+ does, except MEMORIZATION OF MINUTE DETAILS. The number of questions between a 35 and a 40 is only a few, and those are likely detail oriented questions that you just need to memorize that most people don't. (I say likely detail oriented because if you are scoring 35+ then you have the reasoning/passages down)
Just a thought.
Dr. JD posted that more than a year ago. I doubt he will read this .I have to respectfully, but TOTALLY disagree. Details such as obscure facts, formulas and vocab have nothing to do with a 40. I happened to get a 40 and spent many, many months of my life working toward that and trying to figure out this dang exam. Details, in my opinion, is where most students go wrong. Getting to the 35 has everything to do with understanding things conceptually, dealing with complex/wierd/obscure passages without being intimidated, being able to quickly run thru possible relationships in your head until you get the "one" the question's author was isolating, etc. Going from a 35 to a 40 is nothing more than systematically removing errors. Most people in the mid 30s are making "several" mistakes or miscues on things they should have gotten right. If they can move that down to only a "couple" of mistakes or miscues they have a shot at a 40+.
I have to respectfully, but TOTALLY disagree. Details such as obscure facts, formulas and vocab have nothing to do with a 40. I happened to get a 40 and spent many, many months of my life working toward that and trying to figure out this dang exam. Details, in my opinion, is where most students go wrong. Getting to the 35 has everything to do with understanding things conceptually, dealing with complex/wierd/obscure passages without being intimidated, being able to quickly run thru possible relationships in your head until you get the "one" the question's author was isolating, etc. Going from a 35 to a 40 is nothing more than systematically removing errors. Most people in the mid 30s are making "several" mistakes or miscues on things they should have gotten right. If they can move that down to only a "couple" of mistakes or miscues they have a shot at a 40+.