- Joined
- May 31, 2003
- Messages
- 928
- Reaction score
- 7
Hello:
I am currently on a surgery rotation but I'm interested in doing EM when I "grow up". Anyway, I've been a little disspointed/disillusioned in regards to emergency medicine during my current surgical rotation. This is because of the consults that we get to the ER. Bascially, it seems as though the ER staff/residents/etc are unwilling or unable to work up even the simplest cases - stuff even a med student would try. Not too mention, missing out on the bigger cases that go to the trauma surgeons or someone else. Specific examples:
1. Surgical consult for inguinal hernia - we get down to the ER and find a man with a large inguinal hernia - however, we give him some local anesthetic and reduce it right there. Couldn't the ER have reduced an inguinal hernia without a surgical consult? Why wouldn't the ER wait and consult the surgery team in the case of a NON-reducable hernia?
2. A case of suspected appendicitis with no findings on PE or imaging. This one really annoyed me - a young woman in mild distress presents to the emergency room after dinner one night with diffuse abdominal pain that had incresaed throughout the day. Upon presenting, a transvaginal US was ordered to check for ovarian cysts. A CBC and BMP were also ordered along with a surgical consult. We get down there (10 hours later) and the pt reports that she is feeling a bit better. She has no WBC elevtion, negative PE, no temp, and her transvaginal U/S is negative.
Here's my question(s): (1) If the U/S machine was already out and runnin', why not stick it on the RLQ and look for changes consistent with appendicitis?? (2) If you know that a surigcal conslut for an 'acute abdomen' in a stable pt is going to result in a CT scan anyway, why not have it ordered already? I just think the workup was very incomplete - it seems as though a surgical consult could have been avoided - the pt could have been discharged with her suspected viral gastrenteritis the night she came in by following a few more steps.
3. A 30 yo female, 16 weeks pregnant, presents with RUQ pain and diffuse tenderness - at least that's what we are told on surgical consult for suspected cholecystitis. Upon arriving to the ER, we find that there is no UA ordered and a full workup for pyelonephritis/UTI has not been explored. I'm a lowly medical student, but the pts positive PE findings, including costovertebral tenderness and hx (pregnancy) seem to suggest UTI at least to the extent that a UA could have been ordered first, along with an U/S of the RUQ to check for cholecystitis/etc before calling surgery. UA came back positive and pt was discharged with antibiotics.
I constanty defend the field of EM to students/residents that tell me that I will become nothing more than a "triage nurse". I don't believe this is true, but these examples I have seen during surgery would kinda point that way. Are these just outlier examples from routine practice? Please help me clear up any misperceptions. Thanks.
I am currently on a surgery rotation but I'm interested in doing EM when I "grow up". Anyway, I've been a little disspointed/disillusioned in regards to emergency medicine during my current surgical rotation. This is because of the consults that we get to the ER. Bascially, it seems as though the ER staff/residents/etc are unwilling or unable to work up even the simplest cases - stuff even a med student would try. Not too mention, missing out on the bigger cases that go to the trauma surgeons or someone else. Specific examples:
1. Surgical consult for inguinal hernia - we get down to the ER and find a man with a large inguinal hernia - however, we give him some local anesthetic and reduce it right there. Couldn't the ER have reduced an inguinal hernia without a surgical consult? Why wouldn't the ER wait and consult the surgery team in the case of a NON-reducable hernia?
2. A case of suspected appendicitis with no findings on PE or imaging. This one really annoyed me - a young woman in mild distress presents to the emergency room after dinner one night with diffuse abdominal pain that had incresaed throughout the day. Upon presenting, a transvaginal US was ordered to check for ovarian cysts. A CBC and BMP were also ordered along with a surgical consult. We get down there (10 hours later) and the pt reports that she is feeling a bit better. She has no WBC elevtion, negative PE, no temp, and her transvaginal U/S is negative.
Here's my question(s): (1) If the U/S machine was already out and runnin', why not stick it on the RLQ and look for changes consistent with appendicitis?? (2) If you know that a surigcal conslut for an 'acute abdomen' in a stable pt is going to result in a CT scan anyway, why not have it ordered already? I just think the workup was very incomplete - it seems as though a surgical consult could have been avoided - the pt could have been discharged with her suspected viral gastrenteritis the night she came in by following a few more steps.
3. A 30 yo female, 16 weeks pregnant, presents with RUQ pain and diffuse tenderness - at least that's what we are told on surgical consult for suspected cholecystitis. Upon arriving to the ER, we find that there is no UA ordered and a full workup for pyelonephritis/UTI has not been explored. I'm a lowly medical student, but the pts positive PE findings, including costovertebral tenderness and hx (pregnancy) seem to suggest UTI at least to the extent that a UA could have been ordered first, along with an U/S of the RUQ to check for cholecystitis/etc before calling surgery. UA came back positive and pt was discharged with antibiotics.
I constanty defend the field of EM to students/residents that tell me that I will become nothing more than a "triage nurse". I don't believe this is true, but these examples I have seen during surgery would kinda point that way. Are these just outlier examples from routine practice? Please help me clear up any misperceptions. Thanks.