Well, so perhaps the A+ thing isn't as big of a conspiracy as i originally thought
but the problem still remains with the +/- system in general. Lets just look at my original scenario and bump the grades down a bit. Lets say Student X gets half A's (all 95%) and half B's (all 80%) so his GPA would be 3.5. Now Student Y goes to a school where all the classes are +/- and gets half A's (95%) and half B's (82%) so unfortunately he gets a GPA of 3.33. Student Y now has to do a lot better on his DAT than Student X does just to have the same chances of admission to dental school, even though Student Y had the same or a better grade in every single class. Still seems pretty messed up to me, and I know TONS of people who have gotten B-s or B+s, thats usually just a set grading scale (80-82 = B- 83-86 = B and 87-89 = B+).
Also, its not like there is a discrepancy just between different schools. I went to a college where each teacher could choose their own grading system. No standard policy. So look at this scenario (which happens to be a real one that I took part in and hence part of my bitterness towards +/-)....
I take a class with one professor who uses +/- while my friend takes the SAME class with a professor who uses a straight scale. I get a 92% in the course and get an A- and my friend BARELY pulls an A with a 89.8%.
Result: My GPA = 3.67
His GPA = 4.0
Why should someone who took the same class, at the same school, with the same curriculum, get a better grade than someone who actually got a higher % in the class than him solely based on which grading scale the prof decided to use???
That same semester we both took another course, but the scenario is flipped, my prof was straight scale, and his used +/-. So I pull a 89% and get a B and he gets a 87% and gets a B+.
Result: My GPA = 3.0
His GPA = 3.33
I know of plenty of other circumstances where something similar has happend, and it just aint right. Just think if someone got all 89% in every class they ever took and they ended up with a 3.0 GPA overall. This means that they need a KILLER DAT to even get a shot at acceptance. Now someone else gets 87% in every class ever, but due to +/- grading they end up with a 3.33 GPA. This student now has a decent GPA and still needs to do well on the DAT, but his odds are WAY better than the 3.0 guy, and the 3.0 guy did better than him in EVERY class they ever took.
So yeah, anyone still think the +/- system shouldn't be banned? or at least make whatever grading system used universal.....thoughts?