1. Dismiss Notice
  2. Download free Tapatalk for iPhone or Tapatalk for Android for your phone and follow the SDN forums with push notifications.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Hey Texans—join us for a DFW meetup! Click here to learn more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice

Interview Feedback: Visit Interview Feedback to view and submit interview information.

Interviewing Masterclass: Free masterclass on interviewing from SDN and Medical College of Georgia

aamc fl #16 Chem and phys section

Discussion in 'MCAT Study Question Q&A' started by yjj8817, Aug 21, 2015.

  1. yjj8817

    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2010
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    2
    Status:
    Pre-Medical
    I am confused about this question can anyone help?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Note: SDN Members do not see this ad.

  3. BerkReviewTeach

    BerkReviewTeach Company Rep & Bad Singer
    Exhibitor 10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,842
    Likes Received:
    603
    From an organic chemistry perspective, you can consider protecting groups. If you recall from carbonyl chemistry, ketals (RO-C-OR) are the protected form of ketones. They are inert to many reactions. That can be applied to the sugar linkage. In choices A, B, and C, you'll notice that the right sugar (ß-D-glucopyranose in each case) is in its hemiacetal state (the right side of the right sugar is RO-C1-OH), which is not protected. It can undergo oxidation (converting Ag+ into Ag(s), forming the "silver mirror" in a Tollen's test), which is why they are referred to as reducing sugars.

    In sucrose (choice D), it is a linkage between the anomeric carbon (C1) of glucose and the anomeric carbon (C2) of fructose. This results in a ketal linkage (rather than hemi), so the sugar cannot be oxidized (is not a reducing sugar). In essence, it is protected.

    If you happen to have a BR organic book, then look at Book 2 pages 106 and 110.
     

Share This Page