BlackFrost
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2022
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 1
Last edited:
I would like to explain the whole background behind my academic dishonesty charge. This occurred for an intro biology class where we still had online exams. For these online exams, when an interruption occurred we were told to explain it which I failed to do. Basically, I have a history of urine issues and a few months ago, I had actually peed blood which is why I'm apprehensive anytime I feel a random pressure around my genitals which happened during the test. Been meeting up with my nephrologist due to this issue but anyways, I thought that I explained why I was leaving to use the bathroom when I had left the room but I hadn't. I only realized this a month after the actual test when I was given a notice by my college's academic judiciary as my professor had submitted an academic misconduct form against me. I know that I should have double-checked whether or not I had actually explained why I was leaving the room but I hadn't which is completely my fault. I'm going to have a hearing with the judiciary since I do feel like this is appealable but given the fact that I only really have medical evidence and I can't prove 100% that I didn't leave for other nefarious reasons, I'm going to most likely fail. I'll get an F in the class which honestly isn't that bad since I thought that I was originally going to be expelled. My gpa will tank but I've completed most of my pre-requisites with high grades so after this F, my non-science gpa should still be a 4.0 and my science gpa should be around a 3.5. However, I will have to report this action when applying to medical schools which worries me. Are my chances for medical school ruined or would I be able to compensate with a high MCAT and extracurriculars? At this point, I just want to get into a medical school.
Fight to avoid being found guilty. However, all you can do after submitting your explanation, objective medical evidence, and a sincere statement of remorse for your unintentional oversight is to wait for the committee's response. As @GoSpursGo said, you do not know if you will be found guilty. Similarly, you do not know if the punishment will be a F for this course. While an academic IA will be detrimental to your application, you will have the opportunity to explain the circumstances as being one of unintentional oversight rather than an intentional attempt to cheat. With sufficient time and redemption (holding positions of trust, having recommenders speak of your integrity, etc.), I do not think that this will be a deal breaker at all schools, though it will certainly make your journey more difficult. Just my thoughts.I submitted medical documentation that showed that my urine tests revealed above high rbc in my urine a few months ago. I honestly don't know what I'm going to do if I lose this case. In all honesty. I've been beating myself up over this stupid lapse of judgement and if I do get an institutional action over this, I'm going to be lost over my future. I feel like I've ruined my entire 2 years of college grades due to this, how can the people at admissions trust that my grades weren't due to cheating over this. This has been the first time I've ever been accused of cheating so there's that at the very least even as pathetic as that sounds.
Again, wait to see how the hearing turns out before deciding when to apply. You may be found innocent. Good luck and I wish you the best.Thanks a lot for the words of reassurance. I'm going to start working as a cna soon and I hope that this position, alongside my responsibilities as leadership in my club and a research assistant for a lab can show redemption. How much would sufficient time be though? Obviously I won't be able to apply as a rising senior like a bunch of my friends but would 2 years after the incident be fine or would it have to be significantly longer.
I think you are misunderstanding the issue.Good luck with the conduct board review. May I suggest that you use the word "urgency" to describe your need to use the bathroom rather than "random pressure". Many (all most all) of us know that feeling of needing the bathroom with no time to stop and explain the interruption. I think that you may receive the empathy of the board members as almost everyone has been in a situation where they needed to get there as quickly as possible!
Depending on the school and process, this may either (a) not be allowed, or (b) make what would have been a pretty straightforward proceeding confrontational in a way that would not be in the OPs benefit.Talk to a lawyer. Even if you have no case, it always helps to bring one to any sort of conduct meeting. I learned this the hard way!
I think you are misunderstanding the issue.
As someone who also took proctored remote exams during the pandemic, the issue is not that OP had a "urgent" need to leave the room. The issue is that OP did not disclose at the end of the exam, as required, gambling that no one would review tape.
OP lost that bet, and now has a really "urgent" problem that explaining the need to use the rest room will not solve. OP faces the uphill battle of explaining why they did not disclose. It looks like they were hiding something. Possibly because they were.
"I forgot that I was alone in a room taking an exam and was supposed to explain any time I was out of camera range" is just going to be a very tough sell that has absolutely nothing to do with bladder issues. Most of us facing such an issue would be tripping over ourselves to explain well before being called into a disciplinary hearing.
I think I can help you with that!I certainly concur that if the OP made no attempt even after the exam to explain the problem, then the OP can be liable. Having an illness is not by itself a reason to not follow the expectations of the instructor. But I am not witness to how the OP was prompted or confirmed that there was nothing to report.