1. Download free Tapatalk for iPhone or Tapatalk for Android for your phone and follow the SDN forums with push notifications.
    Dismiss Notice

Academic Medicine

Discussion in 'Physician Scientists' started by Crazy Carl, May 24, 2002.

  1. Crazy Carl

    Crazy Carl Member
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2001
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm looking for career advice. I don't have every last aspect of my medical career planned out, but I do know that I want to enter academic medicine and be a professor at a med school somewhere. I was wondering if anyone had ANY feedback about how best to approach this goal. I've always thought I would go the traditional route and get an MD, but I'm now starting to consider getting an MD/PhD. I love research now, and expect it would (necessarily) be a big part of my career. Is it better to go MSTP and get an MD/PhD, or will "just" an MD be enough? I think I would be competitive as an MSTP applicant. I'm a rising senior, but am going to wait until next year to apply and take a year off.

    Also, any other thoughts on pursuing this career would be more than welcome. Thanks for your help!

    Carl
     
  2. Note: SDN Members do not see this ad.

  3. Spudster

    Spudster Member
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    It seems to me that choosing to pursue a joint degree is much more involved than simply asking oneself "do I love research or not?" For me, I love research, yes, but the reason I chose to do MSTP is that I felt that I would greatly benefit from the training in my chosen field and that that training could not otherwise have been obtained by just doing a research fellowship. For me, it seemed that since there is so much "overhead" in biophysics, that it makes sense to get the full preparation. Now, if your interests lie in a different field, it may or may not make sense for you to do MSTP. For instance, if your research leanings are clinical in nature, then you would be best served just getting an MD. Same goes if you intend to spend most of your time in clinic and only a small portion in the lab. MSTP is a big investment of the most creative years of your life. As yourself what you really see yourself doing as a Med School professor and if that would need the additional training a PhD would provide. I must say that if I had chosen to go into something along the lines of cell bio or the like, I probably would have just stuck with the MD... but that is just me.
     
  4. atsai3

    10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2002
    Messages:
    1,283
    Likes Received:
    9
    Status:
    Fellow [Any Field]
    Crazy Carl:

    The decisions you face with MD vs MSTP are similar, except that with MSTP you just have to be a little bit more sure about academic medicine. (You don't need to be 110% sure, because some MSTP programs allow you to drop out at any time.) It is certainly possible to hold your cards, matriculate "plain vanilla"-MD, and then decide later on a career in academic medicine. When this happens, you could easily just do a one- or two-year research fellowship post-residency. Many academic physicians go this route.

    Food for thought:

    <a href="http://www.nigms.nih.gov/news/reports/mstpstudy/mstpstudy.html" target="_blank">http://www.nigms.nih.gov/news/reports/mstpstudy/mstpstudy.html</a>

    Cheers
    -a.
     
  5. Crazy Carl

    Crazy Carl Member
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2001
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the link. That's interesting stuff. By the way, I'm most interested in neurology if that's relevant to the discussion
     

Share This Page