SuperTech said:
I have a dilemma... would you go to a rx school that is accredited but it's located across the country or stay in your home state and go to a rx school that is non-accredited??? please help! I'm so confused.
Hello Supertech,
Well, congratulation on all the acceptance....Going on to your question...Well, you must be refered to TOURO & Midwestern (Chicago) right? I guess the best way to decide would be to sit down and list all the factors that are important to you during the next 4 years of your life. For example, how were the campuses compare one to the other (friendliness, easy accessible to grocery, restaurant...etc...). I mean you still need a life though. I think although TOURO is not accredited yet, I'm sure it's a good school becuz of other professional program that it already had (osteopathic...). And then in 3 years, it will definitely get accredited.
Hypothetically, lets say you got accepted to UCSD (NOT accredited yet), would you still worry? I wouldn't. Becuz it's a good school and already had other programs established there for a long time....You would probably pick UCSD among other accredited schools right.
Back to the question....So after listing all the factors/qualities, I would assign a point-system, which ever school has more points, I would go there. I wish I'm in your position now and have the same dilemma that you do. It must feel good knowing that all these schools WANT you right?
Well, if the dilemma happen to me, I would pick TOURO, not just because it's in state and I don't have to move far, but since both program require 4 years, I like TOURO 's 2 years of experiential program, which I think would allow me to learn more and better prepare myself to be a GREAT pharmacist. It's also important to attend school where the professor actually care about their students and from all the comments, it sounded that TOURO provided all that.
Good luck with your decision and keep us posted.