- Joined
- Feb 14, 2010
- Messages
- 172
- Reaction score
- 1
Hey everyone,
I keep hearing about discrepancies between the level of difficulty of the actual Mcat and the AAMC FLs. It seems like the consensus is that the actual exam is harder than the AAMC exams...
For those who have taken the exam or are savvy with Mcat knowledge, I am wondering in what way was the actual Mcat more difficult?
I hear a lot of peaple talk about the increased length of the passages; however, are the contents also more difficult? If the AAMC exams are easier than the actual Mcat, then what FLs or practice passages (Kaplan, TPR, BR, EK ect.) best model the length and difficulty of the current Mcat?
Thanks!
I keep hearing about discrepancies between the level of difficulty of the actual Mcat and the AAMC FLs. It seems like the consensus is that the actual exam is harder than the AAMC exams...
For those who have taken the exam or are savvy with Mcat knowledge, I am wondering in what way was the actual Mcat more difficult?
I hear a lot of peaple talk about the increased length of the passages; however, are the contents also more difficult? If the AAMC exams are easier than the actual Mcat, then what FLs or practice passages (Kaplan, TPR, BR, EK ect.) best model the length and difficulty of the current Mcat?
Thanks!