- Joined
- May 27, 2002
- Messages
- 172
- Reaction score
- 0
Alright,
So here's the situation. I'm applying this coming summer, but I have a question about my grades (I will be taking the April MCAT).
I am a 5th year senior, Biology and History double major. I decided to stay a 5th year because I wanted the History degree and because I wanted to improve my ugrad GPA.
After this semester, I have gotten my Science GPA up to a 3.50 and my Cum GPA at about 3.57...so I have gotten in the ballpark of admissions.
The prob is that I have had some trouble with cell bio/genetics and with chem.
In the past, I got a B- in an intro genetics course, C+ in O Chem I and a C+ in a middle-(200)level cell bio course, and then I got a C- in a middle-level (200) genetics course....yea, ouch...
So, this last semester, I took an advanced Physiology (300) level cell and membrane course and I got an "A", I took O-Chem II and got a B+, I took O-Chem lab 2 semesters ago and got an "A", I took a cells/tissues lab and got an "A", and I took a molecular evolution course (300) level with genetics as a background and got an "A".
My question--do you think this is "proficiency enough" for my past 4 bad grades?
Next semester, I plan on taking a different 200 level cells/tissues course, an advanced physio (300) level systems course, a 200 level cells/tissues lab course, and I want to take that 200-level C- genetics over again. Would all this be overkill? I really feel that I should take them because I need to prove I am capable of handling the work.
Then, next year, I am doing a Microbiology MS in which I will be taking Biochem lecture, labs, and upper division genetics courses. (so you see...this year is all "fixing" up the cell bio stuff, the summer and early next year is fixing biochem and genetics stuff).
...but schools won't have my grades until I am well into the admissions process for next year.
Anyway, sorry for the long message. I really do appreciate all of your responses and advice.

So here's the situation. I'm applying this coming summer, but I have a question about my grades (I will be taking the April MCAT).
I am a 5th year senior, Biology and History double major. I decided to stay a 5th year because I wanted the History degree and because I wanted to improve my ugrad GPA.
After this semester, I have gotten my Science GPA up to a 3.50 and my Cum GPA at about 3.57...so I have gotten in the ballpark of admissions.
The prob is that I have had some trouble with cell bio/genetics and with chem.
In the past, I got a B- in an intro genetics course, C+ in O Chem I and a C+ in a middle-(200)level cell bio course, and then I got a C- in a middle-level (200) genetics course....yea, ouch...
So, this last semester, I took an advanced Physiology (300) level cell and membrane course and I got an "A", I took O-Chem II and got a B+, I took O-Chem lab 2 semesters ago and got an "A", I took a cells/tissues lab and got an "A", and I took a molecular evolution course (300) level with genetics as a background and got an "A".
My question--do you think this is "proficiency enough" for my past 4 bad grades?
Next semester, I plan on taking a different 200 level cells/tissues course, an advanced physio (300) level systems course, a 200 level cells/tissues lab course, and I want to take that 200-level C- genetics over again. Would all this be overkill? I really feel that I should take them because I need to prove I am capable of handling the work.
Then, next year, I am doing a Microbiology MS in which I will be taking Biochem lecture, labs, and upper division genetics courses. (so you see...this year is all "fixing" up the cell bio stuff, the summer and early next year is fixing biochem and genetics stuff).
...but schools won't have my grades until I am well into the admissions process for next year.
Anyway, sorry for the long message. I really do appreciate all of your responses and advice.
